1887
Volume 31, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1461-0213
  • E-ISSN: 1570-5595
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Introduction, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/aila.00010.int-1.gif

This work is licensed under a license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00010.int
2019-03-12
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aila.00010.int.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00010.int&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bateson, G.
    (1979) Mind and nature. A necessary unity. London: Fontana.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein, J. H.
    (2015) Transdisciplinarity. A review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourdieu, P.
    (1985) The market of symbolic goods. Poetics, 14(1–2), 13–44. 10.1016/0304‑422X(85)90003‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(85)90003-8 [Google Scholar]
  4. Broschart, J.
    (Ed.) (2007) Über die Sprachwissenschaft hinaus. Sprache und Linguistik aus transdisziplinärer Sicht: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Byrd Clark, J.
    (2016) Transdisciplinary approaches to language learning and teaching in transnational times. Introduction to the Special Issue. L2 Journal, 8(4), 2–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Rampton, B., & Richardson, K.
    (1992) Researching language. Issues of power and method. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Canagarajah, S.
    (2013) Translingual practice. Global Englishess and cosmopolitan relations. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cook, V. J.
    (1991) The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multi-competence. Second Language Research, 7(2), 103–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. De Costa, P., & Norton, B.
    (2017) Introduction. Identity, transdisciplinarity, and the good language teacher. Modern Language Journal, 101(S1), 3–14. 10.1111/modl.12368
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12368 [Google Scholar]
  10. Douglas Fir Group
    Douglas Fir Group (2016) A transdisciplinary rramework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100, 19–47. 10.1111/modl.12301
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301 [Google Scholar]
  11. Filipovic, J.
    (2015) Transdisciplinary approach to language study: The complexity theory perspective. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/9781137538468
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137538468 [Google Scholar]
  12. García, O.
    (2009) Bilingual education in the 21st century,. A global perspective. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. García, O., Ibarra Johnson, S., & Seltzer, K.
    (2017) The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualism for learning. Philadelphia: Caslon.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. García, O., & Li, W.
    (2014) Translanguaging. Language, Bilingualism and Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (2001) New ways of meaning. The challenge to applied linguistics. InA. Fill & P. Muhlhausler (Eds.), The Ecolinguistics reader. Language, ecology and environment (pp.175–202). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hawkins, M. R., & Mori, J.
    (2018) Considering ‘trans-’ perspectives in language theories and practices Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 1–8. 10.1093/applin/amx056
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx056 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hult, F.
    (2010) Theme-based research in the transdisciplinary field of educational linguistics. InF. Hult (Ed.), Directions and prospects for educational linguistics. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9136‑9_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9136-9_2 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jantsch, E.
    (1970) Inter- and transdisciplinary university. Systems approach to education and innovation. Policy Sciences, 1(4), 403–428. 10.1007/BF00145222
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145222 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kern, R.
    (2014) Language, literacy, and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kramsch, C.
    (2008) Multilingual, like Franz Kafka. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5(4), 316–332.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2015) Applied linguistics. A theory of the practice. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 454–465. 10.1093/applin/amv039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv039 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kramsch, C., & Huffmaster, M.
    (2015) Multilingual practices in foreign language study. InJ. Cenoz & D. Gorter (Eds.), Multilingual education. Between language learning and translanguaging (pp.114–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, W.
    (2017) Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mahan, J. L.
    (1970) Toward transdisciplinary inquiry in the humane sciences. (PhD Doctoral dissertation), United States International University. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.
  25. Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A.
    (Eds.) (2007) Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. MLA, Ad hoc committee on foreign l
    MLA, Ad hoc committee on foreign l (2007) Foreign language and higher education. New structures for a changed world. Profession (12), 234–245. 10.1632/prof.2007.2007.1.234
    https://doi.org/10.1632/prof.2007.2007.1.234 [Google Scholar]
  27. Natsoulas, T.
    (1990) The pluralistic approach to the nature of feelings. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11(2), 173–217.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pennycook, A.
    (2018) Posthumanist applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 445–461.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Perrin, D.
    (2012) Transdisciplinary action research. Bringing together communication and media researchers and practitioners. Journal of Applied Journalism and Media Studies, 1(1), 3–23. 10.1386/ajms.1.1.3_1
    https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms.1.1.3_1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pohl, C., & Hirsch Hadorn, G.
    (Eds.) (2007) Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. München: Oekom.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sealey, A., & Carter, B.
    (2004) Applied linguistics as social science. London et al.: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Stokols, D.
    (2014) Training the next generation of transdisciplinarians. InM. O’Rourke, S. Crowley, S. D. Eigenbrode & J. D. Wulfhorst (Eds.), Enhancing communication and collaboration in interdisciplinary research. Los Angeles: Sage. 10.4135/9781483352947.n4
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483352947.n4 [Google Scholar]
  33. Van Lier, L.
    (1997) Apply within, apply without. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 95–105. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.1997.tb00108.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1997.tb00108.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Widdowson, H. G.
    (2005) Applied linguistics, interdisciplinarity, and disparate realities. InP. Bruthiaux, D. Atkinson, W. G. Eggington, W. Grabe & V. Ramanathan (Eds.), Directions in applied linguistics (pp.12–25). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853598500‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598500-003 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2006) Applied linguistics and interdisciplinarity. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 93–96. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2006.00108.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00108.x [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00010.int
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error