1887
Volume 32, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1461-0213
  • E-ISSN: 1570-5595

Abstract

Abstract

There has been a rapid global expansion of English instruction in the early grades in public school curricula. Particularly in so-called developing countries, the increase of and its shift from exclusively private to public education is linked to the idea that acquiring English promotes personal, social, and economic development. The author takes one case of a recent early English program, the national program in Mexico, and argues that it is a representative case of a language education programme and policy organized around neoliberal principles. The policy’s stated goal is to address issues of access and equity for public school students; however, findings indicate that the actual processes of teaching and learning at the classroom level remain highly stratified across social class lines. An analysis of English lessons in schools at different points on the socioeconomic spectrum illustrates that instruction is preparing children with certain types of skills and dispositions congruent to their class position and revealing the hidden curriculum of work in early English education.

This work is licensed under a license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00020.say
2020-04-07
2020-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aila.00020.say.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00020.say&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Anyon, J.
    (1981) Social class and social knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11, 235–246. 10.1080/03626784.1981.11075261
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1981.11075261 [Google Scholar]
  2. (1980) Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. The Journal of Education, 162(1), 67–92. 10.1177/002205748016200106
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748016200106 [Google Scholar]
  3. Au, W., & Apple, M.
    (2009) Rethinking reproduction: Neo-Marxism in critical education theory. InM. Apple, W. Au, & L. A. Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp.83–95). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F.
    (2017) Rethinking case study research: A comparative approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Becker, G. S.
    (1994) Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Billings, S.
    (2014) Language, globalization and the making of a Tanzanian beauty queen. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Block, D.
    (2014) Social class in applied linguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M.
    (2012) Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H.
    (1976) Schooling in capitalist America: Education reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bruthiaux, P.
    (2002) Hold your courses: Language education, language choice, and economic development. TESOL Quarterly, 36(3), 275–296. 10.2307/3588414
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588414 [Google Scholar]
  11. Clayton, T.
    (2006) Language choice in a nation under transition: English language spread in Cambodia. New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/0‑387‑31194‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-31194-7 [Google Scholar]
  12. de Mejía, A.-M.
    (2009) Teaching English to young learners in Colombia: Policy, practice and challenges. Mextesol Journal, 33(1), 103–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2002) Power, prestige, and bilingualism: International perspectives on elite bilingual education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853595929
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595929 [Google Scholar]
  14. Enever, J.
    (2012) Current policy issues in early foreign language learning. CEPS Journal, 2(3), 9–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Erling, E. J., & Seargeant, P.
    (Eds.) (2013) English and development: Policy, pedagogy and globalization. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847699473
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847699473 [Google Scholar]
  16. Flores, N.
    (2013) The unexamined relationship between neoliberalism and plurilingualism: A cautionary tale. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 500–520. 10.1002/tesq.114
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.114 [Google Scholar]
  17. Forbes
    Forbes (2014) ¿A cuál clase social pertences? [What social class do you belong to?]. Forbes México. May17 2014 Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com.mx/a-cual-clase-social-perteneces-segun-la-se/ (28September 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamid, M. O.
    (2010) Globalisation, English for everyone and English teacher capacity: Language policy discourses and realities in Bangladesh. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(4), 289–310. 10.1080/14664208.2011.532621
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2011.532621 [Google Scholar]
  19. Heller, M.
    (2010) The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 101–114. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hopkins, D., Ahtaridou, E., Matthews, P., & Posner, C.
    (2007) An analysis of the Mexican school system in light of PISA 2006. London: London Centre for Leadership in Learning, University of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía [National Census Bureau of Mexico])
    INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía [National Census Bureau of Mexico]) (2016) Encuesta Nacional de Ingresos y Gastos de los Hogares 2016. Retrieved from: www.beta.inegi.org.mx/temas/hogares/ (30April 2018).
  22. Jones, S., & Vagle, M. D.
    (2013) Living contradictions and working for change: Toward a theory of social class-sensitive pedagogy. Educational Researcher, 42(3), 129–141. 10.3102/0013189X13481381
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13481381 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuchah, K.
    (2018) Early English medium instruction in Francophone Cameroon: The injustice of equal opportunity. System, 73(2), 37–47. 10.1016/j.system.2017.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  24. López-Gopar, M.
    (2016) Decolonizing primary English language teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783095773
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095773 [Google Scholar]
  25. López-Gopar, M., & Sughrua, W.
    (2014) Social class and English language education in Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 13(2), 104–110. 10.1080/15348458.2014.901822
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2014.901822 [Google Scholar]
  26. Matear, A.
    (2008) English language learning and education policy in Chile: Can English really open doors for all?Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(2), 131–147. 10.1080/02188790802036679
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790802036679 [Google Scholar]
  27. McGroarty, M.
    (1996) Language attitudes, motivation, and standards. InS. L. McKay & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp.3–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nguyen, H. T. M.
    (2011) Primary English language education policy in Vietnam: Insights from implementation. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 225–249. 10.1080/14664208.2011.597048
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2011.597048 [Google Scholar]
  29. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development)
    OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2018) Agenda: 1st Joint IMF-OECD-World Bank Conference on Structural Reforms. Conference Program. Paris, France: June 2018 Retrieved from: www.oecd.org/eco/reform/joint-imf-wb-oecd-conf-structural-reform-2018/ (28September 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Park, J. S., & Wee, L.
    (2012) Markets of English: Linguistic capital and language policy in a globalizing world. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Pennycook, A.
    (2007) The myth of English as an international language. InS. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp.90–115). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ramírez Romero, J. L., Sayer, P., & Pamplón Irigoyen, E. N.
    (2014) English language teaching in public primary schools in Mexico: The practices and challenges of implementing a national language education program. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(8), 1020–1043. 10.1080/09518398.2014.924638
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.924638 [Google Scholar]
  33. Reyes Cruz, M., Murrieta Loyo, G., & Hernández Méndez, E.
    (2011) Políticas lingüísticas nacionales e internacionales sobre la enseñanza del inglés en escuelas primarias. Revista Pueblos y Fronteras Digital, 6(12), 167–197. 10.22201/cimsur.18704115e.2011.12.126
    https://doi.org/10.22201/cimsur.18704115e.2011.12.126 [Google Scholar]
  34. Sayer, P.
    (2018) Does English really open doors? Social class and English teaching in public primary schools in Mexico. System, 73(2), 58–70. 10.1016/j.system.2017.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2015) “More & earlier”: Neoliberalism and primary English education in Mexican public schools. L2 Journal, 7(3), 40–56. 10.5070/L27323602
    https://doi.org/10.5070/L27323602 [Google Scholar]
  36. Sayer, P., & López-Gopar, M.
    (2015) Language education in Mexico: Access, equity, and ideology. InW. Wright, O. García, & S. Boun (Eds.), The handbook of bilingual and multilingual education, (pp.576–589). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Seargeant, P.
    (2013) Introduction: English and development. InE. J. Erling & P. Seargeant (Eds.), English and development: Policy, pedagogy and globalization (pp.1–20). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847699473‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847699473-004 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tyack, D. & Tobin, W.
    (1994) The ‘grammar’ of schooling: why has it been so hard to change?American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453-479. 10.3102/00028312031003453
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031003453 [Google Scholar]
  39. Vavrus, F.
    (2002) Postcoloniality and English: Exploring language policy and the politics of development in Tanzania. TESOL Quarterly, 36(3), 373–397. 10.2307/3588418
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588418 [Google Scholar]
  40. Wedell, M.
    (2013) Proficiency in English as a key to development? Helping teachers to help learners succeed. InE. J. Erling & P. Seargeant (Eds.), English and development: Policy, pedagogy and globalization (pp.141–162). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847699473‑010
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847699473-010 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2008) Developing a capacity to make ‘English for Everyone’ worthwhile: Reconsidering outcomes and how to start achieving them. International Journal of Education Development, 28(6), 628–639. 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  42. Zentz, L.
    (2016) English on the rise: Access and resources in internationalization. InM. Gazzola & B.-A. Wickström (Eds.), The economics of language policy (pp.433–468). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034708.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034708.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00020.say
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00020.say
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error