1887
Volume 33, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1461-0213
  • E-ISSN: 1570-5595

Abstract

Abstract

Drawn from a larger project on reported speech in parliamentary interaction (Reber, forthcoming), this paper studies visuo-material performances of so-called “literalized” (Rumsey, 1992) quoting, i.e., verbatim reproductions of original utterances. Taking an interactional-linguistic perspective, I analyze how participants accomplish ‘literalized’ reported speech through vocal, verbal, and visual cues, recruiting their material documents. The data are culled from video recordings of Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs), a parliamentary session where the Prime Minister (PM) takes questions from the Leader of the Opposition (LO) and Members of Parliament (MPs) at the British House of Commons. I place my focus on cases where speakers use original documents as visual aids, a classic rhetoric device of persuasion, and show how paper documents are constituted, celebrated, and rhetorically enacted as (seemingly) original documents in embodied, situated ways. As a conclusion, I argue that the display of original documents allows the speaker to make claims of having not only evidential but also experiential access to their sources, a practice that underpins their evidential authority.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00036.reb
2020-10-07
2020-10-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aila.00036.reb.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00036.reb&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aikhenvald, A. Y.
    (2004) Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Antaki, Ch., & Leudar, I.
    2001 Recruiting the record: Using opponents’ exact words in parliamentary argumentation. Text, 21(4), 467–488. 10.1515/text.2001.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2001.008 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arendholz, J., Kirner, M., & Bublitz, W.
    (Eds.) (2015) Quoting now and then. Leiden: Brill. 10.1515/9783110427561
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561 [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkinson, M.
    (1984) Our Masters’ Voices: The language and body language of politics. London / New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2004) Lend me your ears. All you need to know about making speeches and presentations. London: Vermillion.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2017) If Mugabe goes, will Dr Sentamu get a new dog-collar?Max Atkinson’s Blog, 15November 2017 Retrieved from https://maxatkinson.blogspot.de/2017/11/if-mugabe-goes-will-dr-sentamu-get-new.html/ (12August 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blackwell, N. L., Perlman, M., & Fox Tree, Jean E.
    (2015) Quotation as a multimodal construction. Journal of Pragmatics, 81, 1–7. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bromley, C., Curtice, J., & Seyd, B.
    (2004) Is Britain facing a crisis of democracy?Technical Report. Constitution Unit, School of Public Policy, University College London.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Buchstaller, I.
    (2014) Quotatives: New trends and sociolinguistic implications. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Buchstaller, I., & van Alphen, I.
    (Eds.) (2012) Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bull, P., & Waddle, M.
    (2019) “Let me now answer, very directly, Marie’s question”: The impact of quoting members of the public in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7(1), 56–78. 10.1075/jlac.00019.bul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00019.bul [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheshire, J., & Fox, S.
    (2007) ‘Innovation in the quotative system of London adolescents: The emergence of this is me’. Paper presented atNWAV 36, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, November.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J.
    (1990) Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66, 764–805. 10.2307/414729
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
  14. Clayman, St. E., & Heritage, J.
    (2002) The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
  15. Clift, R.
    (2006) Indexing stance: reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(5), 569–595. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00296.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00296.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Coulmas, F.
    (1986) Reported speech: Some general issues. InF. Coulmas (Eds.), Direct and indirect speech (pp.1–28). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110871968.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871968.1 [Google Scholar]
  17. Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (2004) Prosody and sequence organisation: The case of new beginnings. InE. Couper-Kuhlen & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction (pp.335–376). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.62.17cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.62.17cou [Google Scholar]
  18. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Barth-Weingarten, D.
    (2011) A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. English translation and adaptation of Selting, Margret et al: Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2. Gesprächsforschung Online, 12, 1–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M.
    (1996) Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. InE. Couper-Kuhlen, & M. Selting (Eds), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (p.11–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.003 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2001) Introducing Interactional Linguistics. InM. Selting, & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics (pp.1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.10.02cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10.02cou [Google Scholar]
  21. (2018) Interactional Linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fetzer, A., & Bull, P.
    (2019) Quoting ordinary people in Prime Minister’s Questions. InA. Fetzer, & E. Weizman (Eds.), The construction of ‘ordinariness’ across media genres (pp.73–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.307.04ani
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.04ani [Google Scholar]
  23. Fetzer, A., & Weizman, E.
    (2018) ‘What I would say to John and everyone like John is …’: The construction of ordinariness through quotations in mediated political discourse. Discourse & Society, 29 (5), 495–513. 10.1177/0957926518770259
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518770259 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fleckner, U.
    (1997) Napoleons Hand in der Weste. Von der ethischen zur politischen Rhetorik einer Geste. Daidalos. Architektur – Kunst – Kultur, 64, 122–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fumagalli, A.
    (2016) Adrian Amstutz’ «Verfassung» war gar keine. Aargauer Zeitung, 5October 2016 Retrieved from https://www.aargauerzeitung.ch/schweiz/adrian-amstutz-verfassung-war-gar-keine-130620996/ (12August 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Good, J. S.
    (2015) Reported and enacted actions: Moving beyond reported speech and related concepts. Discourse Studies, 17, 663–681. 10.1177/1461445615602349
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615602349 [Google Scholar]
  27. Goodwin, M.
    (1990) He-said-she-said: Talk as social organisation among black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Haapanen, L., & Perrin, D.
    (2017) Media and quoting. Understanding the purposes, roles, and processes of quoting in mass and social media. InD. Perrin, & C. Cotter (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and media (pp.424–441). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315673134‑31
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673134-31 [Google Scholar]
  29. Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D.
    (1986) Generating applause. A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 110–157. 10.1086/228465
    https://doi.org/10.1086/228465 [Google Scholar]
  30. Heritage, J., & Raymond, G.
    (2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
  31. HM Revenue & Customs
    HM Revenue & Customs 2019 P45 manual. 15February 2019 Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/511179/P45_Manual_12_15.pdf (12 August, 2019).
  32. Holt, E.
    (1996) Reporting on talk: the use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(3), 219–245. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2009) Reported speech. InS. D’hondt, J.-O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), The pragmatics of interaction (pp.190–205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.4.11hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.4.11hol [Google Scholar]
  34. Holt, E., & Clift, R.
    (Eds.) (2010) Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Horton, D., & R. R. Wohl
    (1956) Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229. 10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ilie, C.
    (2010) Strategic uses of parliamentary forms of address: The case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 885–911. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.017 [Google Scholar]
  37. Keevallik, L.
    (2010) Bodily quoting in dance correction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(4), 401–426. 10.1080/08351813.2010.518065
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2010.518065 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2013) The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(1), 1–21. 10.1080/08351813.2013.753710
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753710 [Google Scholar]
  39. Koch, P., & Oesterreicher, W.
    (2007) Schriftlichkeit und kommunikative Distanz. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 35(3), 346–375. 10.1515/zgl.2007.024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl.2007.024 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mathis, T., & Yule, G.
    (1994) Zero quotatives. Discourse Processes, 18(1), 63–76. 10.1080/01638539409544884
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539409544884 [Google Scholar]
  41. Mollin, S.
    (2007) The Hansard hazard. Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora, 2(2), 87–210. 10.3366/cor.2007.2.2.187
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2007.2.2.187 [Google Scholar]
  42. Mondada, L.
    (2019) Practices for showing, looking, and videorecording: The interactional establishment of a common focus of attention. InE. Reber, & C. Gerhardt (Eds.), Embodied activities in face-to-face and mediated settings – social encounters in time and space (pp.63–104). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑97325‑8_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97325-8_3 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2016Conventions for multimodal transcription. Version 3.0.6, July 2016 Retrieved from https://franzoesistik.philhist.unibas.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/franzoesistik/mondada_multimodal_conventions.pdf (12August 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Reber, E.
    (Forthcoming). Quoting in parliamentary question time. Exploring recent change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (2019) ‘Punch and Judy’ politics? Embodying challenging courses of action in parliament. InE. Reber, & C. Gerhardt (Eds.), Embodied activities in face-to-face and mediated settings: Social encounters in time and space (pp.255–297). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑97325‑8_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97325-8_8 [Google Scholar]
  47. Rumsey, A.
    (1992) Wording, meaning, and linguistic ideology. American Anthropologist, 92, 346–361. 10.1525/aa.1990.92.2.02a00060
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1990.92.2.02a00060 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sato, I. L.
    (2014) Social relations and institutional structures in modern American political campaigns (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Santa Barbara.
  49. Sealey, A. & Bates, St.
    (2016) Prime ministerial self-reported actions in Prime Minister’s Questions 1979–2010: A corpus-assisted analysis. Journal of Pragmatics104: 18–31. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.010 [Google Scholar]
  50. Slembrouck, St.
    (1992) The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature, 1(2), 101–119. 10.1177/096394709200100202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709200100202 [Google Scholar]
  51. Stec, K., Huiskes, M., & Redeker, G.
    (2016) Multimodal quotation: Role shift practices in spoken narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 104, 1–17. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  52. Streeck, J.
    (2008) Gesture in political communication: A case study of the Democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 154–186. 10.1080/08351810802028662
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028662 [Google Scholar]
  53. Stukenbrock, A.
    (2018) Forward-looking: Where do we go with multimodal projections?InA. Deppermann, & J. Streeck (Eds.), Modalities and temporalities: Convergences and divergences of bodily resources in interaction (pp.31–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tannen, D.
    (22007) Talking voices: repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
  55. van Dijk, T. A.
    (2014) Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107775404
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107775404 [Google Scholar]
  56. Vincze, L., Bongelli, R., Riccioni, I., & Zuczkowski, A.
    (2016) Ignorance-unmasking questions in the Royal-Sarkozy presidential debate: A resource to claim epistemic authority. Discourse Studies, 18(4), 430–453. 10.1177/1461445616646924
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616646924 [Google Scholar]
  57. Willey, David
    2017 EU summit: My part in the Treaty of Rome signing. BBC News, 25March 2017 Retrieved from www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39365281 (12 August 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Wooffitt, R., & Alistone, S.
    (2008) Participation, procedure and accountability: ‘You said’ speech markers in negotiating reports of ambiguous phenomena. Discourse Studies, 10(3): 407–427. 10.1177/1461445608090225
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608090225 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00036.reb
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00036.reb
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): evidentiality , PMQs , quotation , rhetorical device and visuo-material performance
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error