Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1461-0213
  • E-ISSN: 1570-5595



This issue of the focuses on transdisciplinarity as the key to developing shared languages in and across domains and professional settings. The relationship and collaboration between researchers and practitioners have long been discussed within and across applied sciences and theoretical disciplines, mainly in the framework of transdisciplinarity (see 31, 2018, for a recent overview). However, research approaches that claim to combine theoretical and practical needs and expectations often lack either solid grounding in empirical data or thorough reflection from theoretical perspectives. This special issue aims to take the discussion further by rethinking transdisciplinarity systematically from theoretical and practical angles. In so doing, we focus on developing shared languages that facilitate communication and mutual learning in multistakeholder discourses – with the ultimate goal of sustainably solving socially relevant problems. In the introduction, we present working definitions of our topic’s key terms (Part 1). We then go through the topics, results, and main interconnections of the six approaches examined in the papers included in this issue (Part 2). Based on the insights from the discussion so far, we set up a framework to systematically analyse three dimensions of developing shared languages: negotiation process, interplay of key drivers, and seizing opportunities (Part 3).


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Buchs, A., Petit, O. & P. Roman
    (2020) Can social ecological economics of water reinforce the “big tent”?. Ecological Economics, 169. doi:  10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106553
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106553 [Google Scholar]
  2. Cameron, Deborah, Frazer, Elizabeth, Rampton, Ben, & Richardson, Kay
    (1992) Researching language. Issues of power and method. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Clarke, A.
    (2003) On being an object of research: reflections from a professional perspective. Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 374–385. 10.1093/applin/24.3.374
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.3.374 [Google Scholar]
  4. Dressen-Hammouda, D.
    (2013) Ethnographic approaches to ESP research. InB. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Ed.), The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell, 501–517.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Garrett, P.
    (2010) Language awareness. InM. Berns (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, (pp.293–295).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R.
    (1990) Hidden differences. Doing business with the Japanese. New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R.
    (1989) Language, context, and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. (2. ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1999) The notion of “context” in language educationIn: Ghadessy, M. (Ed.) (1999) Text and context in functional linguistics. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.169.04hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.169.04hal [Google Scholar]
  9. Handford, M., Garrett, P., & Cots, J. M.
    (2019) Introduction to language awareness in professional communication contexts. Language Awareness, 28(3), 163–165. Retrieved fromhttps://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rmla20
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Holmes, J. & M. Marra
    (2014) The complexities of communication in professional workplaces. InV. Bhatia & S. Bremner (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Professional Communication. Abingdon & New-York: Routledge, 112–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. International Plain Language Federation
    International Plain Language Federation (2020) What is plain language? International Plain Language Federation. Retrieved fromhttps://www.iplfederation.org
  12. Isani, S.
    (2014) Ethnography as a research-support discipline in ESP teaching, learning and research in the French academic context. ASp, 66, 27–39. 10.4000/asp.4531
    https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.4531 [Google Scholar]
  13. Keckses, I.
    (2015) Language, culture, and context. In: Sharifian, F. (Ed.) (2015) The Routledge Handbook of language and culture. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledgep.113–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kemman, M.
    (2019) Knowledge asymmetry in interdisciplinary collaborations and how to reduce it. https://i2insights.org/2019/02/26/knowledge-asymmetry/
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Paris, A., Deygas, B., Cornu, C., Thalamas, C., Maison, P., Duale, C., Kane, M., Hodaj, E., & Cracowski, J.-L.
    (2015) Improved informed consent documents for biomedical research do not increase patients’ understanding but reduce enrolment: A study in real settings. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 80(5), 1010–1020. 10.1111/bcp.12716
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12716 [Google Scholar]
  16. Pennycook, A.
    (2018) Applied linguistics as epistemic assemblage. AILA Review, 31, 113–134. 10.1075/aila.00015.pen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00015.pen [Google Scholar]
  17. Perrin, D.
    (2013) The linguistics of newswriting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aals.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.11 [Google Scholar]
  18. Perrin, D. & C. Kramsch
    (2018) Transdisciplinarity in applied linguistics. AILA Review, 31, 1–13. 10.1075/aila.00010.int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00010.int [Google Scholar]
  19. Rahm, H., Sandell, N. & Svensson, P.
    (2020) Corporate dreams – Approprirate aspirations and the building of trust in annual reports. Studies in Communication Sciences, 20 (1), 77–91. 10.24434/j.scoms.2020.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2020.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  20. Rankin, T., & Stegu, M.
    (2018) Language for life: educational, professional and social contexts. Language Awareness, 27(1–2). doi:  10.1080/09658416.2018.1433492
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2018.1433492 [Google Scholar]
  21. Resche, C.
    (2013) Economic Terms and Beyond: Capitalising on the Wealth of Notions. Bern: Peter Lang, “Linguistic Insights” Series. 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0589‑6
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0589-6 [Google Scholar]
  22. Rigotti, E., & Rocci, A.
    (2006) Towards a definition of communication context. Foundations of an interdisciplinary approach to communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 6(2), 155–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sarangi, S., Clarke, A., Bennert, K., & Howell, L.
    (2003) Categorisation practices across professional boundaries: some analytic insights from genetic counselling. InS. Sarangi & T. van Leeuwen (Eds.), Applied Linguistics and communities of practice. London: Continuum (pp.150–168).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schön, D. A.
    (1983) The reflective practitioner: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Svalberg, A. M.-L.
    (2007) State of the art. Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching, 40(4), 287–308. 10.1017/S0261444807004491
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004491 [Google Scholar]
  26. van Dijk, T. A.
    (2009) Society and Discourse [Electronic resource] How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511575273
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575273 [Google Scholar]
  27. Wenger, Etienne
    (1998) Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932 [Google Scholar]
  28. Whitehouse, M.
    (in prep.). Writing in finance: (mis)communication and its impact on society at large.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wozniak, S.
    (2019) Approche ethnographique des langues spécialisées professionnelles. Bern: Peter Lang, “Aspects linguistiques et culturels des discours spécialisés” Series. 10.3726/b15912
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b15912 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ződi, Z.
    (2019) The limits of plain legal language: understanding the comprehensible style in law. International Journal of Law in Context, 15, 246–262. 10.1017/S1744552319000260
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552319000260 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error