1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. AILA Review
  4. Volume 35, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 35 Number 2
  • ISSN 1461-0213
  • E-ISSN: 1570-5595
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Recent studies on CLIL have revealed contradictory results regarding its role in enhancing equal opportunities and social inclusion. This special issue draws on the theme of the CLIL ReN symposium at AILA 2021, “CLIL Pedagogy and Greater Fairness, Equity, and Inclusion”, and the papers in this volume address both opportunities and challenges of CLIL in contributing to equity and inclusion. The special issue seeks to question, explore, and understand how CLIL might have the potential or not to contribute to greater equity and access to quality educational provision, with attention to not only the learning of languages, but also of content. (In)equity in CLIL will be addressed through conceptual as well as empirical studies which focus on different contexts (Argentina, Australia, Japan, Spain, and The Netherlands) and different educational levels (primary, secondary, pre-vocational studies, and pre-service teacher education).

© 2022 AILA
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00054.edi
2023-06-30
2024-10-08

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aila.00054.edi
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allan, J., & Artiles, A. J.
    (Eds.) (2016) World yearbook of education 2017: Assessment inequalities. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315517377
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315517377 [Google Scholar]
  2. Apple, M. W.
    (1982) Education and power. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. (1979) Ideology and curriculum. Routledge & Kegan Paul. 10.4324/9780203241219
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203241219 [Google Scholar]
  4. Apple, M. W., & Weis, L.
    (1985) Ideology and schooling: The relationship between class and culture. Education and Society, 3(1), 45–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernstein, B. B.
    (1990) The structuring of pedagogic discourse. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. (1971) Class, codes, and control. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bower, K., Coyle, D., Cross, R., & Chambers, G. N.
    (Eds.) (2020) Curriculum integrated language teaching. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108687867
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108687867 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H.
    (1976) Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. (2002) Schooling in Capitalist America Revisited. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 1–18. 10.2307/3090251
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3090251 [Google Scholar]
  10. Broca, A.
    (2016) CLIL and non-CLIL: Differences from the outset. ELT Journal, 70(3), 320–331. 10.1093/elt/ccw011
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw011 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D.
    (2014) Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. 10.1093/applin/amt011
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011 [Google Scholar]
  12. Coyle, D.
    (2018) The place of CLIL in (bilingual) education. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 166–176. 10.1080/00405841.2018.1459096
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1459096 [Google Scholar]
  13. Coyle, D., & Meyer, O.
    (2021) Beyond CLIL. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108914505
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914505 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cross, R.
    (2013) Research and evaluation of the content and language integrated learning (CLIL) approach to teaching and learning languages in Victorian schools. Victorian Department of Education and Training.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. (2015) Defining content and language integrated learning for languages education in Australia. Babel, 49(2), 4–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2013) A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 216–253. 10.1515/eujal‑2013‑0011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2013-0011 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U.
    (2010) Charting promises premises and research on content and language integrated learning. InC. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit. (Eds.) Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp.1–19). John Benjamins. 10.1075/aals.7.01dal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7.01dal [Google Scholar]
  18. (2010) Language use and language learning in CLIL: Current findings and contentious issues. InC. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp.279–291). John Benjamins. 10.1075/aals.7.14dal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7.14dal [Google Scholar]
  19. Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T.
    (2014) “You can stand under my umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A response to Cenoz, Genesee, & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 213–218. 10.1093/applin/amu010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu010 [Google Scholar]
  20. Darling-Hammond, L.
    (1994) Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 5–31. 10.17763/haer.64.1.j57n353226536276
     https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.64.1.j57n353226536276 [Google Scholar]
  21. Douglas Fir Group
    Douglas Fir Group (2016) A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47. 10.1111/modl.12301
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fernández-Agüero, M., & Hidalgo-McCabe, E.
    (2020) CLIL Students’ affectivity in the transition between education levels: The effect of streaming at the beginning of secondary education. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 21(6), 363–377. 10.1080/15348458.2020.1795864
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1795864 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fielding, R., & Harbon, L.
    (2022) Dispelling the monolingual myth: Exploring literacy outcomes in Australian bilingual programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(3), 997–1020. 10.1080/13670050.2020.1734531
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1734531 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hidalgo-McCabe, E.
    (2020) Streaming in CLIL and its effects on students’ socialisation in school. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. UAM Repository. https://repositorio.uam.es/bitstream/handle/10486/692813/hidalgo_mccabe_elisa.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  25. Hüttner, J.
    (2017) ELF and Content and Language Integrated Learning. InJenkins, J., Baker, W. & Dewey, M. (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of English as a lingua franca (pp.481–493). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315717173‑39
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717173-39 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., & Michelson, S.
    (1972) Inequality: A reassessment of the effects of family and schooling in America. Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lamb, S., Jackson, J., Walstab, A., & Huo, S.
    (2015) Educational opportunity in Australia 2015: Who succeeds and who misses out. Centre for International Research on Education Systems, Victoria University, for the Mitchell Institute.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lasagabaster, D.
    (2022) English-medium instruction in higher education. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108903493
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108903493 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lin, A. M.
    (2016) Language across the curriculum and CLIL in English as an additional language (EAL) contexts: Theory and practice. Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑1802‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1802-2 [Google Scholar]
  30. Llinares, A.
    (2015) Integration in CLIL: A proposal to inform research and successful pedagogy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 58–73. 10.1080/07908318.2014.1000925
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000925 [Google Scholar]
  31. Llinares, A., & Evnitskaya, N.
    (2021) Classroom interaction in CLIL programs: Offering opportunities or fostering inequalities?TESOL Quarterly, 55(2), 366–397. 10.1002/tesq.607
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.607 [Google Scholar]
  32. Llinares, A., & McCabe, A.
    (2020) Systemic functional linguistics: The perfect match for content and language integrated learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–6. 10.1080/13670050.2019.1635985
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1635985 [Google Scholar]
  33. Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R.
    (2012) The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lorenzo, F., Granados, A., & Rico, N.
    (2021) Equity in bilingual education: Socioeconomic status and Content and Language Integrated Learning in monolingual Southern Europe. Applied Linguistics, 42(3), 393–413. 10.1093/applin/amaa037
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa037 [Google Scholar]
  35. Martín Rojo, L.
    (2010) Educating in multilingual and multicultural schools in Madrid. InL. Martín Rojo (Ed.), Constructing inequality in multilingual classrooms (pp.15–50). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110226645.15
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226645.15 [Google Scholar]
  36. Morton, T.
    (2020) Cognitive discourse functions: A bridge between content, literacy and language for teaching and assessment in CLIL. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 3(1), 7–17. 10.5565/rev/clil.33
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.33 [Google Scholar]
  37. Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U.
    (Eds.) (2016) Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783096145
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096145 [Google Scholar]
  38. OECD
    OECD (2019) PISA 2018 results (Vol.II1). OECD Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Reilly, T. & Medrano, P.
    (2009) MEC/British Council Bilingual Project. Twelve years of education and a smooth transition into secondary. InE. Dafouz & M. Guerrini (Eds.), CLIL across educational levels London (pp.59–70). Richmond.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Smala, S., Paz, J. B., & Lingard, B.
    (2013) Languages, cultural capital, and school choice: Distinction and second-language immersion programmes. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(3), 373–391. 10.1080/01425692.2012.722278
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2012.722278 [Google Scholar]
  41. Somers, T.
    (2017) Content and language integrated learning and the inclusion of immigrant minority language students: A research review. International Review of Education, 63(4), 495–520. 10.1007/s11159‑017‑9651‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-017-9651-4 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tompkins, F. L.
    (2022) Socioeconomic status, English exposure, and CLIL motivation in high and low exposure CLIL groups. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 5(1), 41–52. 10.5565/rev/clil.67
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.67 [Google Scholar]
  43. Tsuchiya, K., & Pérez Murillo, M. D.
    (2019) Content and language integrated learning in Spanish and Japanese contexts. Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑27443‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27443-6 [Google Scholar]
  44. Watanabe, Y., Ikeda, M., & Izumi, S.
    (2011) CLIL – New challenges in foreign language education at Sophia University: Volume 1, principles and methodologies. Sophia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K.
    (2009) The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. Allen Lane.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.00054.edi
Loading
  • Article Type: Editorial

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error