1887
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1461-0213
  • E-ISSN: 1570-5595
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Transdisciplinary collaboration has become one of the most important agendas in the field of Applied Linguistics and professional communication. Investigation into transdisciplinary collaboration has been conducted at the interface of both fields through knowledge transformation and multimethod action research. In Japan, however, investigation into transdisciplinary collaboration or transdisciplinarity still holds great potential for development. As the first step to investigate transdisciplinary collaboration, the author conducted in-depth interviews with eight Japanese business professionals who are also engaged in academic collaboration. The purpose of this study is to understand the challenges and opportunities they are currently facing in transdisciplinary collaboration and to identify shared goals that both applied linguists (academics) and business professionals can explore by focusing on shared language and knowledge transformation in business practice. The whole interview data were analysed using the Modified Grounded Theory Approach (M-GTA) (Kinoshita, 2003), in which nine basic concepts were obtained in the Open Coding Stage. These were then categorised into four larger groups in the Selective Coding Stage: (1) the current barriers for transdisciplinarity, (2) integration of theory and practice, (3) sensitivity to common ground, and (4) contribution to Japanese society. After presenting these concepts, the construction of shared language as a theme of collaboration is highlighted in the Discussion section.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aila.20009.fuj
2021-09-09
2022-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alessi, G. M., & Jacobs, G.
    (2016) Reflections on the Ins and Outs of business and professional discourse research. InAlessi, G. M., & Jacobs, G. (Eds.) Ins and Outs of business and professional discourse research. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137507686_1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137507686_1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, J.
    (2020) Stakeholder. Retrieved on21 May 2021fromhttps://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stakeholder.asp
  3. Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A.
    (2008) Qualitative methods in business research. Sage. 10.4135/9780857028044
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028044 [Google Scholar]
  4. Fujio, M.
    (2011) Communication strategies in action: The negotiation, establishment, and confirmation of common ground. Seibido.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L.
    (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kinoshita, Y.
    (2003) Guraundeddo Seori Apurouchi no Jissen [Modified grounded theory approach]. Kobundo.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kramsch, C.
    (2015) Applied linguistics: A theory of the practice. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 454–465. 10.1093/applin/amv039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv039 [Google Scholar]
  8. METI (The Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry)
    METI (The Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry) (2016) Guideline for enhancing industry-academia-government collaboration activities formulated. Retrieved on21 May 2021fromhttps://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2016/1130_001.html
  9. Millar, S. L., & Jensen, A.
    (2009) Language choice and management in Danish multinational companies: The role of common sense. Sociolinguistica, 23, 86–103. 10.1515/9783484605879.86
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484605879.86 [Google Scholar]
  10. Morgan, D. L.
    (1997) Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage. 10.4135/9781412984287
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984287 [Google Scholar]
  11. Murakami, A.
    (2018) Soshikiteki na sankangakurenkei wo okonau uedeno mondaiten to sono haikei youin [Problems and underlying factors preventing systematical industry-government-academia collaborations]. STI Horizon, 4(4), 38–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Perrin, D.
    (2018) On, for, and with practitioners: A transdisciplinary approach to text production in real-life settings. AILA Review, 31, 53–80. 10.1075/aila.00013.per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00013.per [Google Scholar]
  13. Perrin, D., & Kramsch, C.
    (2018) Transdisciplinarity in applied linguistics. AILA Review, 32, 1–13. 10.1075/aila.00010.int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00010.int [Google Scholar]
  14. Svalberg, A. M.-L.
    (2007) Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching, 40(4), 287–308. 10.1017/S0261444807004491
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004491 [Google Scholar]
  15. Tanaka, H.
    (2008) Communication strategies and cultural assumptions: An analysis of French-Japanese business meetings. InS. Tietze (Ed.), International management and language (pp.154–170). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C.
    (2004) Managing people across cultures. Capstone.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Whitehouse, M.
    (2018) The language of numbers: Transdisciplinary action research and financial communication. AILA Review, 31, 81–112. 10.1075/aila.00014.whi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00014.whi [Google Scholar]
  18. Wilkes-Gibbs, D.
    (1997) Studying language use as collaboration. InG. Kasper & E. Kellerman (Eds.), Communication strategies: Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Yamada, H., Kelm, O. R., & Victor, D. A.
    (2017) The seven keys to communicating in Japan: An Intercultural approach. Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aila.20009.fuj
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.20009.fuj
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error