1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. AILA Review
  4. Volume 36, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 36, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1461-0213
  • E-ISSN: 1570-5595
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to evaluate gender differences in the language used in United Nations (UN) General Assembly debates by one male and one female representative each from India, China, the USA, and Indonesia. The critical discourse analysis (CDA) framework of van Dijk (2015) was used along with the 25 discursive devices in this framework. The data on frequencies of variables were analysed statistically. No significant differences were observed between positive comments about oneself, negative comments about others, length of speech (in words), and the various devices by the gender of the speaker at the 0.05 level of significance. However, gender differences in terms of higher levels for males than for females were observed for populism ((6) = 2.354,  = .057), norm expression ((6) = 2.171,  = 0.073), and positive comments about oneself ((6) = 2.224,  = .068). The correlation coefficients were significant between genders for positive-self, norm expression, and national self-glorification only. These results could be attributed to the small size of four male and four female speeches, leading to high values of standard error, which reflects the significance of differences. Also, there could be overlapping and mixing of gender characteristics in connection with different contexts and occasions due to emergent identities. These political identities were created in particular situations or contexts, and it was not clear how much they could be a result of female or male politicians’ styles. This explanation by Sivrić and Jurčić (2014) seems to be valid for this research as well. Small samples could be a limitation of this study. However, many other works used even smaller samples. The generalisability of these findings needs to be tested using other similar studies.

© 2023 AILA
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aila.23001.als
2024-02-15
2024-10-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aila.23001.als
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Almahasees, Z., & Mahmoud, S.
    (2022) Persuasive strategies utilized in the political speeches of King Abdullah II: A critical discourse analysis. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9(1), 2082016. 10.1080/23311983.2022.2082016
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2082016 [Google Scholar]
  2. Božić Lenard, D.
    (2016) Gender differences in the political speeches from the 113th United States Congress. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek. Retrieved24 November 2022fromhttps://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/197870034.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Cameron, D., & Shaw, S.
    (2016) A different voice. InD. Cameron & S. Shaw, Gender, power and political speech: Women and language in the 2015 UK General Election (pp.1–4). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑58752‑7_1
     https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58752-7_1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chris, D.
    (2022, October23). 21 Great examples of discourse analysis. Helpful Professor. Retrieved20 November 2022fromhttps://helpfulprofessor.com/discourse-analysis-examples/
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cummings, S., Regeer, B., De Haan, L., Zweekhorst, M., & Bunders, J.
    (2018) Critical discourse analysis of perspectives on knowledge and the knowledge society within the Sustainable Development Goals. Development Policy Review, 36(6), 727–742. 10.1111/dpr.12296
     https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12296 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dada, S., Ashworth, H. C., Bewa, M. J., & Dhatt, R.
    (2021) Words matter: Political and gender analysis of speeches made by heads of government during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Global Health, 6(1), e003910. 10.1136/bmjgh‑2020‑003910
     https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003910 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dai, S.-C., & Wang, N. C.-H.
    (2021) To be (different) or not to be: The role of gender in constructing diplomatic speeches. Women’s Studies International Forum, 881, 102506. Pergamon. 10.1016/j.wsif.2021.102506
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2021.102506 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dijk, V.
    (2005) Politics, ideology and discourse. InR. Wodak (Ed.), Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (Vol. Volume on Politics and Language, pp.728–740). Elsevier. RetrievedNovember 23, 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Fairclough, N.
    (2012) Critical Discourse Analysis. InJ. P. Gee, & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.9–20). Routledge. RetrievedJanuary 14, 2024, fromhttps://www.google.co.in/books/edition/The_Routledge_Handbook_of_Discourse_Anal/Q2T6-LHp8T8C?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PR3&printsec=frontcover
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Mandravickaitė, J., & Krilavičius, T.
    (2017) Stylometric analysis of parliamentary speeches: Gender dimension. Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Balto-Slavic Natural Language Processing, April 2017, Valencia, Spain (pp.102–107). Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/W17‑1416
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-1416 [Google Scholar]
  11. Najarzadegan, S., Dabaghi, A., & Eslami-Rasekh, A.
    (2017) A critical discourse analysis of Iran and US presidential speeches at the UN: The sociopragmatic functions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(9), 764–774. 10.17507/tpls.0709.08
     https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0709.08 [Google Scholar]
  12. Rababah, A. G., & Hamdan, J. M.
    (2019) A contrastive critical discourse analysis of Netanyahu’s and Abbas’s speeches on the Gaza war (2014). Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(1), 178–189. 10.17507/jltr.1001.20
     https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1001.20 [Google Scholar]
  13. Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R.
    (2005) Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9780203993712
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203993712 [Google Scholar]
  14. Shakoury, K.
    (2018) Critical discourse analysis of Iranian presidents’ addresses to the United Nations General Assembly (2007–2016). Department of Linguistics and Religious Studies. University of Saskatchewan. Retrieved20 November 2022fromhttps://harvest.usask.ca/bitstream/handle/10388/8577/SHAKOURY-THESIS-2018.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Shakoury, K., & Makarova, V.
    (2021) Critical discourse analysis of micro and macro structures in talks by two Iranian presidents at the United Nations General Assembly: A socio-cognitive perspective. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 13(1), 109–130. 10.22111/IJALS.2021.6150
     https://doi.org/10.22111/IJALS.2021.6150 [Google Scholar]
  16. Sharififar, M., & Rahimi, E.
    (2015) Critical discourse analysis of political speeches: A case study of Obama’s and Rouhani’s speeches at UN. Theory and Practice in Language studies, 5(2), 343–349. 10.17507/tpls.0502.14
     https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0502.14 [Google Scholar]
  17. Sivrić, M., & Jurčić, D.
    (2014) Gender differences in political discourse. InA. Akbarov (Ed.), Linguistics, culture and identity in foreign language education (pp.1231–1240). International Burch University. Retrieved24 November 2022fromhttps://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/61715450/Burch_University_-_Proceedings_book_201420200108​-21284​-gjkkjn​.pdf​?1578481067=&response​-content​-disposition​=inline​%3B​+filename​%3D​LINGUISTICS​_CULTURE​_AND​_IDENTITY​_IN​_FORE​.pdf&Expires​=1669277794&Signature​=cqzrXC
     [Google Scholar]
  18. UN
    UN (2022) High-level meetings of the 77th session. General Assembly of the United Nations. Retrieved1 May 2023fromhttps://www.un.org/en/ga/77/meetings/
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Van Dijk, T. A.
    (2005) Politics, ideology and discourse. InR. Wodak (Ed.), Elsevier encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Vol.Politics and Language, pp.728–740). Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. (2015) Critical discourse analysis. InD. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., Vol.I1, pp.466–485). Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch22
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22 [Google Scholar]
  21. Wall, J. D., & Stahl, B. C.
    (2015) Critical discourse analysis as a review methodology: An empirical example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1), 257 – 285. 10.17705/1CAIS.03711
     https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03711 [Google Scholar]
  22. Wodak, R.
    (2009) Discursive construction of national identity. InR. Wodak, R. de Cillia, M. Reisigl, & K. Liebhart (Eds.), Discursive construction of national identity (2nd ed., pp.7–48). Edinburgh University Press. RetrievedJanuary 14, 2024, fromhttps://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Discursive_Construction_of_National_Iden/tA2rBgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1
     [Google Scholar]
  23. (2009) The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Springer. RetrievedJanuary 14, 2024, fromhttps://www.google.co.in/books/edition/The_Discourse_of_Politics_in_Action/c71sCwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1
     [Google Scholar]
  24. (2015) Critical discourse analysis, discourse-historical approach. InK. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (pp.1–14). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118611463/wbielsi116
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463/wbielsi116 [Google Scholar]
  25. Wodak, R., & Chilton, P.
    (Eds.) (2005) A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity (Vol.131). John Benjamins Publishing. RetrievedJanuary 14, 2024, fromhttps://www.google.co.in/books/edition/A_New_Agenda_in_Critical_Discourse_Analy/-BwtKtxHoEcC?hl=en&gbpv=1
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M.
    (2009) Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. InMethods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., Vol.21, pp.1–33). Sage, London. RetrievedJanuary 14, 2024, fromhttps://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/34102595/E1-libre.pdf?1404351797=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DCritical_Discourse_Analysis_History_Agen.pdf&Expires=1705202012&Signature=JKZ3~A2Bh6TIpa9TxntJhlEkOCv4me9Olkx5fVcxSDbYqUwNPy4pWEi-c2s
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Wodak, R., & van Dijk, T. A.
    (Eds.) (2000) Racism at the top: Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K.
    (1999) The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse and Society, 10(2), 149–173. RetrievedJanuary 14, 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Žagar, I.
    (2010) Topoi in critical discourse analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 6(1), 3–27. 10.2478/v10016‑010‑0002‑1
     https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-010-0002-1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Zeng, H., Tay, D., & Ahrens, K.
    (2020) A multifactorial analysis of metaphors in political discourse: Gendered influence in Hong Kong political speeches. Metaphor and the Social World, 10(1), 141–168. 10.1075/msw.19016.zen
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.19016.zen [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.23001.als
Loading
Discourse analysis of male and female representatives of selected countries at the United Nations general debates
AILA Review 36, 163 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23001.als
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.23001.als
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.23001.als
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): CDA; discourse analysis; gender differences; language differences; public speeches

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error