1887
image of Problematizing and reexamining the notion of taking another introductory-level language class at
college
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Existing literature shows that discrepancies between the expectations of students and language instructors might discourage high school students from progressing in their language learning at college. This study aims to address such discrepancies by examining students who studied Chinese in high school but were still taking an introductory-level language course at college, with the intention of declaring a minor or major in Chinese Studies at a Midwestern university in the United States. Drawing on the concept of identity and investment, a qualitative research method was employed to address the time- and context-sensitive nature of identity and investment. Data were collected from interviews and reflection journals to reveal their investment in Chinese language learning and how they coalesced their identities as Chinese language learners in high school and college. Findings show that they firmly fought against the stereotypical assumption that taking another introductory-level class at college was for an easy A, as current world language education policy and implementation rendered them voiceless in the top-down implementation process. This present study provides new insights into the connections between investment and articulation in world language education, and invites stakeholders to reevaluate the predominant emphasis placed on language proficiency in foreign language research and education.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24009.liu
2024-11-21
2024-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. American Council on Teaching Foreign Languages (ACTFL)
    American Council on Teaching Foreign Languages (ACTFL) (2015 a) Foreign language enrollments in K-12 public schools: Are students ready for a global society?Retrieved fromhttps://www.ced.org/pdf/actfl-k12-foreign-language-for-global-society.pdf
  2. American Council on Teaching Foreign Languages (ACTFL)
    American Council on Teaching Foreign Languages (ACTFL) (2015 b) Oral Proficiency Levels in the Workplace. Retrieved fromhttps://www.actfl.org/uploads/files/general/OralProficiencyWorkplacePoster.pdf
  3. American Council on Teaching Foreign Languages (ACTFL)
    American Council on Teaching Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (n.d.). The World-Readiness Standards for Learning Languages. Retrieved fromwww.actfl.org/publications/all/world-readiness-standards-learning-languages
  4. American Councils
    American Councils (2017) The national K-16 foreign language enrollment survey report. Retrieved fromhttps://www.americancouncils.org/sites/default/files/FLE-report.pdf
  5. Block, D.
    (2007) The rise of identity in SLA research, post Firth and Wagner (1997). Modern Language Journal, , –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00674.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00674.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Busse, V., & Walter, C.
    (2013) Foreign language learning motivation in higher education: A longitudinal study of motivational changes and their causes. The modern language journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12004.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12004.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Byrnes, H.
    (1990) Foreign language program articulation from high school to the university [online]. Eric Digest, ERIC Identifier: ED321586. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics: Washington, DC. Retrieved fromhttps://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED321586.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Creswell, J. W.
    (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Darvin, R., & Norton, B.
    (2023) Investment and motivation in language learning: What’s the difference?. Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1017/S0261444821000057
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000057 [Google Scholar]
  10. Diao, W. & Liu, H. Y.
    (2021) Starting college, quitting foreign language: The case of learners of Chinese language during secondary-postsecondary transition. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, (), –. 10.1080/15348458.2020.1726753
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1726753 [Google Scholar]
  11. Duff, P.
    (2008) Case study research in applied linguistics. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Everson
    Everson (2016) InUrlaub, P., Watzinger-Tharp, J., & Bourns, S. K. (eds.). AAUSC 2016 volume-issues in language program direction: The interconnected language curriculum: Critical transitions and interfaces in articulated K-16 contexts (pp.–). Cengage Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Frei, C., Allen, H. W., Swanson, B., & Levine, G. S.
    (2016) Implications of advanced placement world languages and cultures tenets for university foreign language programs. InUrlaub, P., Watzinger-Tharp, J., & Bourns, S. K. (eds.). AAUSC 2016 volume-issues in language program direction: The interconnected language curriculum: Critical transitions and interfaces in articulated K-16 contexts (pp.–). Cengage Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hacking, J. & Rubio, F.
    (2016) A proficiency-based articulation project between postsecondary institutions. InUrlaub, P., Watzinger-Tharp, J., & Bourns, S. K. (eds.). AAUSC 2016 volume-issues in language program direction: The interconnected language curriculum: Critical transitions and interfaces in articulated K-16 contexts (pp.–). Cengage Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hajar, A.
    (2017) Identity, investment and language learning strategies of two Syrian students in Syria and Britain. Language, Culture and Curriculum, (), –. 10.1080/07908318.2017.1317266
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2017.1317266 [Google Scholar]
  16. Harklau, L.
    (2000) From the “good kids” to the “worst”: Representations of English language learners across educational settings. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3588096
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588096 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jahner, D.
    (2012) Beyond requirements: Why do students continue with language study. The Language Educator, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ke, C., Wen, X. & Kotenbeutel, C.
    (2001) Report on the 2000 CLTA articulation project. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, E. J. E.
    (2014) Motivation, investment, and identity in English language development: A longitudinal case study. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2014.01.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.013 [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, C., & Li, W.
    (2020) Learner Identity in Chinese as a Foreign/Second Language Education: A Critical Review. Frontiers of Education in China, (), –. 10.1007/s11516‑020‑0004‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-020-0004-x [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Y., & Zhang, Z. S.
    (2016) CFL education at the college level. InJ. Ruan, J. Zhang, & C. B. Leung (Eds.), Chinese language education in the United States (pp.–). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑21308‑8_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21308-8_8 [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, H. Y.
    (2016) Coming of age learning Mandarin: Chinese L2 learners’ investment during their transition from high school to university. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona.
  23. (2021) Toward a new normal in foreign language classrooms: Attitudes and perceptions of committed learners of Chinese towards CALL. Chinese as a Second Language, (), –. 10.1075/csl.21014.liu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/csl.21014.liu [Google Scholar]
  24. Looney, D., & Lusin, N.
    (2018) Enrollments in languages other than English in United States institutions of higher education, Summer 2016 and Fall 2016: Preliminary report. Modern Language Association. Retrieved fromhttps://www.mla.org/Resources/Research/Surveys-Reports-and-Other-Documents/Teaching-Enrollments-and-Programs/Enrollments-in-Languages-Other-Than-English-in-United-States-Institutions-of-Higher-Education
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Maxwell, J.
    (2012) Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Norton, B.
    (1995) Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3587803
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587803 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2000) Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Essex, UK: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Papa, E. L., & Berka, S.
    (2016) The roadmap to mainstreaming dual language immersion in Rhode Island. InUrlaub, P., Watzinger-Tharp, J., & Bourns, S. K. (eds.). AAUSC 2016 volume-issues in language program direction: The interconnected language curriculum: Critical transitions and interfaces in articulated K-16 contexts (pp.–). Cengage Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Saldaña’s
    Saldaña’s (2016) The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Stott, C., & Fielding, R.
    (2014) Lost in transition?: Perspectives on the transition to university language learning. Babel, (), –. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.471679164845806
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Urlaub, P.
    (2014) On language and content: The stakes of curricular transformation in collegiate foreign language education. InSwaffar, J. and Urlaub, P. (eds.). Transformation postsecondary foreign language teaching in the United States (pp.–). Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑9159‑5_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9159-5_1 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24009.liu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24009.liu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error