1887
image of Learning vocabulary through listening

Abstract

Abstract

This study explored the strategy use of 12 high-school learners of English within a vocabulary teaching intervention which exposed three groups of learners to one of three types of oral vocabulary explanations: L2 explanations; codeswitched explanations (CS); and contrastive focus-on-form explanations (CFoF) giving cross-linguistic information. Unlike previous studies of vocabulary interventions, which have tended to focus solely on quantitative outcome measures and therefore give arguably limited insights into why different interventions have the impact that they do, the study implemented stimulated recall interviews to explore strategy use in order to better understand the learning outcomes from the intervention. A qualitative analysis was undertaken to explore how learners used strategies and whether patterns of use emerged by intervention group and proficiency level. Compared with the CS and L2 groups, learners from the CFoF group attended more specifically to the target words and engaged in more metacognitive reflection and evaluation of the explanations, leading potentially to deeper processing and hence greater vocabulary gains. Such strategy use also seemed, however, to explain their smaller gains in listening comprehension. Finally, strategic behaviour was found to be related to levels of vocabulary knowledge and listening proficiency. The value of exploring qualitative data on strategy use for evaluating the effects of an intervention is discussed, alongside the theoretical and pedagogical implications of these findings.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24019.gra
2024-11-18
2024-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/aila.24019.gra/aila.24019.gra.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24019.gra&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Clenton, J., & Booth, P.
    (2020) Vocabulary and the four skills: Pedagogy, practice, and implications for teaching vocabulary. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429285400
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429285400 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ellis, R.
    (1999) Factors in the incidental acquisition of second language vocabulary from oral input. InR. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.17.06ell
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.17.06ell [Google Scholar]
  3. Fung, D., & Lo, Y. Y.
    (2023) Listening strategies in the English Medium Instruction (EMI) classroom: How students comprehend the teacher input. System, , 10.1016/j.system.2023.103004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R.
    (2008) Listening comprehension and strategy use: A longitudinal exploration. System, (), –. 10.1016/j.system.2007.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2010) Strategy clusters and sources of knowledge in French L2 listening comprehension. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, (), –. 10.1080/17501220802385866
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501220802385866 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gu, Y.
    (2014) To code or not to code: Dilemmas in analysing think-aloud protocols in learning strategies research. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2013.12.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.011 [Google Scholar]
  7. Hennebry, M., Rogers, V., Macaro, E., & Murphy, V.
    (2013) Direct teaching of vocabulary after listening: Is it worth the effort and what method is best?Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2013.849751
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.849751 [Google Scholar]
  8. Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B.
    (2001) Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00164
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00164 [Google Scholar]
  9. Iacobucci, D., Posavac, S., Kardes, F. R., Schneider, M. J., & Popovich, D. L.
    (2015) Toward a more nuanced understanding of the statistical properties of a median split. Journal of Consumer Psychology, , –10.1016/j.jcps.2014.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  10. Laufer, B., & Girsai, N.
    (2008) Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1093/applin/amn018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn018 [Google Scholar]
  11. Macaro, E.
    (2017) Students’ strategies in response to teachers’ second language explanations of lexical items, Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2014.905971
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.905971 [Google Scholar]
  12. Nation, I. S. P.
    (2022) Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Nyikos, M., & Fan, M.
    (2007) A review of vocabulary learning strategies: Focus on language proficiency and learner voice. InA. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learning strategies: 30 years of research and practice (pp.–). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Schmidt, R. W.
    (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129 [Google Scholar]
  15. Schmitt, N.
    (1997) Vocabulary learning strategies. InN. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sharwood Smith, M.
    (1991) Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177%2F026765839100700204
    https://doi.org/10.1177%2F026765839100700204 [Google Scholar]
  17. Suárez, M. D. M., & Gesa, F.
    (2019) Learning vocabulary with the support of sustained exposure to captioned video: Do proficiency and aptitude make a difference?The Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2019.1617768
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1617768 [Google Scholar]
  18. Tian, L., & Macaro, E.
    (2012) Comparing the effect of teacher codeswitching with English-only explanations on the vocabulary acquisition of Chinese university students: A Lexical Focus-on-Form study. Language Teaching Research, , –. 10.1177/1362168812436909
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812436909 [Google Scholar]
  19. Vandergrift, L.
    (2003) Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00232
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00232 [Google Scholar]
  20. Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M.
    (2012) Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203843376
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203843376 [Google Scholar]
  21. Vidal, K.
    (2011) A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00593.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00593.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Webb, S.
    (2021) Research investigating lexical coverage and lexical profiling: What we know, what we don’t know, and what needs to be examined. Reading in a Foreign Language, , –. hdl.handle.net/10125/67407
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Yanagisawa, A., & Webb, S.
    (2022) To what extent does the Involvement Load Hypothesis predict incidental L2 vocabulary learning? A meta-analysis. Language Learning, , –. 10.1111/lang.12444
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12444 [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, P.
    (2018) Comparing different types of EFL vocabulary instruction for Chinese senior secondary school learners of English. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Reading.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, P., & Graham, S.
    (2020a) Vocabulary learning through listening: Comparing L2 explanations, teacher codeswitching, contrastive focus-on form and incidental learning. Language Teaching Research, , –. 10.1177/1362168819829022
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819829022 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2020b) Learning vocabulary through listening: The role of vocabulary knowledge and listening proficiency. Language Learning, , –. 10.1111/lang.12411
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12411 [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhou, S., Fung, D., & Thomas, N.
    (2023) Towards deeper learning in EMI lectures: The role of English proficiency and motivation in students’ deep processing of content knowledge. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, –. 10.1080/01434632.2023.2248078
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2248078 [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhou, S., & Thompson, G.
    (2023) Exploring the role of English proficiency, self-efficacy, and motivation in listening for learners transitioning to an English-medium transnational university in China. System, , 10.1016/j.system.2023.102998
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.102998 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24019.gra
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24019.gra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: vocabulary learning ; proficiency ; strategy use ; listening
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error