1887
Volume 38, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1461-0213
  • E-ISSN: 1570-5595
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper reports on a study exploring students’ engagement with the project Virtual Exchange for English Language Teaching (VEELT). With the aim to provide insights into how we can better engage students, ensuring that future virtual exchanges are more inclusive, this paper focuses on the behavioural, cognitive, and affective engagement dimensions in an exchange utilising English as an International Language (EIL). VEELT involved 53 undergraduate and postgraduate students on English education courses in the UK, Mexico and Spain whose mother tongue was not English and who interacted both synchronously and asynchronously on topics relating to their ELT syllabus in their respective higher education (HE) institutions. The three distinctive features of this paper are: its focus on the three above mentioned engagement dimensions; the discussion relating to English as an International Language (EIL) in VEs and the involvement of students who were trained as e-mediators in Zoom breakout rooms in facilitating the VE task completion. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected to analyse the impact of the VE on the students’ ELT learning journey and their levels of engagement with the VE. While the students’ evaluation of their VEELT experience was positive on the whole, a number of engagement and inclusion challenges were identified. Findings indicate that affective engagement is central to successful participation in VEs, and that strategies such as multilingual introductions, peer mediation, and co-created content can foster more inclusive and equitable learning experiences.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24042.che
2025-12-11
2026-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alharbi, A. S., & Meccawy, Z.
    (2020) Introducing Socrative as a tool for formative assessment in Saudi EFL classrooms. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 372–384. 10.24093/awej/vol11no3.23
    https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.23 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beelen, J., & Jones, E.
    (2015) Redefining internationalization at home. InA. Curai, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi, & P. Scott (Eds.), The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies (pp. 59–72). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑20877‑0_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_5 [Google Scholar]
  3. Belz, J. A.
    (2003) Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2), 68–99. 10.64152/10125/25201
    https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/25201 [Google Scholar]
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V.
    (2012) Thematic analysis. InH. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. 10.1037/13620‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Clouet, R.
    (2023) Multicultural encounters and intercultural dialogue: Interactional experiences of international students on a short-term online language program. InS. Di Sarno-García, S. Montaner-Villalba, & A. Gimeno-Sanz (Eds.), Telecollaboration applications in foreign language classrooms (pp. 161–181). IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑6684‑7080‑0.ch008
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7080-0.ch008 [Google Scholar]
  6. Colpaert, J.
    (2020) Editorial position paper: How virtual is your research?Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(7), 653–664. 10.1080/09588221.2020.1824059
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1824059 [Google Scholar]
  7. Crystal, D.
    (2018) The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108528931
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108528931 [Google Scholar]
  8. Desoutter, C., & Martin, J.
    (2018) Engagement et degré de satisfaction d’étudiants de FLE dans une activité d’écriture télécollaborative italo-espagnole. Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur, 34(2). 10.4000/ripes.1386
    https://doi.org/10.4000/ripes.1386 [Google Scholar]
  9. Di Sarno-García, S.
    (2021) Helping aerospace engineering students develop their intercultural communicative competence. InN. Zoghlami, C. Brudermann, C. Sarré, M. Grosbois, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL and professionalisation: short papers from EUROCALL 2021 (pp. 94–99). Research-publishing.net. 10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1315
    https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1315 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2023) The development of foreign language students’ intercultural communicative competence through telecollaboration. The EuroCALL Review, 30(1), 35–51. 10.4995/eurocall.2023.16693
    https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2023.16693 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2024) Language learners’ expectations and satisfaction level in a telecollaboration project. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Languages & Literature, 17(3). 10.5565/rev/jtl3.1232
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.1232 [Google Scholar]
  12. (forthcoming). Acquiring pragmatic and intercultural communicative competences in the digital era: A telecollaboration study. Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2007) Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H.
    (2004) School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. 10.3102/00346543074001059
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gimeno, A.
    (2018) Learner expectations and satisfaction in a US-Spain intercultural telecollaboration. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 11(3), 5–38. 10.5565/rev/jtl3.776
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.776 [Google Scholar]
  16. Graddol, D.
  17. [Google Scholar]
  18. Griggio, L., & Pittarello, S.
    (2020) How a multilingual project can foster and enhance international mobility. InF. Helm & A. Beaven (Eds.), Designing and implementing virtual exchange — a collection of case studies (pp. 127–139). Research-publishing.net. 10.14705/rpnet.2020.45.1121
    https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2020.45.1121 [Google Scholar]
  19. Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R.
    (2019) Learner engagement in blended learning environments: a conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145–178. 10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481
    https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hauck, M.
    (2023) From virtual exchange to critical virtual exchange and critical internationalization at home. The Global Impact Exchange, 9–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Helm, F.
    (2020) EMI, internationalisation, and the digital. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 314–325. 10.1080/13670050.2019.1643823
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1643823 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hildeblando Júnior, C. A.
    (2023) Virtual exchange as a third space to decolonise ELT (VETSDELT) project: Report on its first action-research cycle. InM. Orsini-Jones, C. A. Hildeblando Júnior, A. Cerveró-Carrascosa, S. Di Sarno-García, & A. Aşik (Eds.), Proceedings of the symposium on discussing global citizenship in language learning and teaching. (pp. 42–49). Coventry University. Retrieved from: https://pure.coventry.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/78493516/Hildeblando_Junior.pdf. 10.18552/GLEA/2023/0006
    https://doi.org/10.18552/GLEA/2023/0006 [Google Scholar]
  23. Holliday, A.
    (2006) Native-speakerism. ELT Journal, 60(4), 385–387. 10.1093/elt/ccl030
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl030 [Google Scholar]
  24. Information Commissioner’s Office
    Information Commissioner’s Office (n.d.). The UK GDPR. RetrievedJanuary 30, 2024, fromhttps://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/data-protection-and-the-eu/data-protection-and-the-eu-in-detail/the-uk-gdpr/
  25. Jenkins, J.
    (2015) English as a Lingua Franca: A Course in Classroom Communication and Practice. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Madish, F. R., Abdullah, A. A., & Sobhanifar, H.
    (2022) Integration of Mentimeter in the classroom: A scoping review. Research Square. 10.21203/rs.3rs‑1339397/v1
    https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3rs-1339397/v1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Marlina, R.
    (2018) Revisiting the pedagogy of English as an international language. RELC Journal, 49(1), 3–8. 10.1177/0033688218765831
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218765831 [Google Scholar]
  28. Moorhouse, B. L., Walsh, S., Li, Y., & Wong, L. L. C.
    (2022) Assisting and mediating interaction during synchronous online language lessons: Teachers’ professional practices. TESOL Quarterly, 56(3), 934–960. 10.1002/tesq.3144
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3144 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nishio, T., & Nakatsugawa, M.
    (2020) ‘Successful’ participation in intercultural exchange: Tensions in American-Japanese telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 154–168. 10.64152/10125/44714
    https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44714 [Google Scholar]
  30. O’Dowd, R.
    (2023) Internationalising higher education and the role of virtual exchange. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Orsini-Jones, M., & Lee, F.
    (2018) Intercultural communicative competence for global citizenship: Identifying cyberpragmatic rules of engagement in telecollaboration. Springer. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑58103‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58103-7 [Google Scholar]
  32. Orsini-Jones, M., Thi Ngoc Thuy, B., Nguyen, A. D., Phi, M. T., Nguyen Thi, T. T., Borthwick, K., Butt, F., Wells, J., & Dew, R.
    (2022) The Vietnam Virtual EXchange for English Language Teaching (ViVEXELT) Project. https://vivexelt.com/
  33. Orsini-Jones, M.
    (2023) Virtual exchange as a transformational third space for English language teacher education: Discussing project ViVEXELT. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 13(1), 1–20. 10.4018/IJCALLT.334712
    https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.334712 [Google Scholar]
  34. Orsini-Jones, M., Thi Ngoc Thuy, B., Wells, J., Preshous, A., Nguyen Thi, T. T., & Butt, F.
    (2023) Action-research and role-reversal-informed creation of a Zoom breakout room guide for e-CIIC mediators. InM. Orsini-Jones, C. A. Hildeblando Júnior, A. Cerveró-Carrascosa, S. Di Sarno-García, & A. Aşik. (Eds.), Proceedings of the symposium on discussing global citizenship in language learning and teaching (pp. 61–72). Coventry University. Retrieved from: https://pure.coventry.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/78493516/Hildeblando_Junior.pdf. 10.18552/GLEA/2023/0008
    https://doi.org/10.18552/GLEA/2023/0008
  35. Orsini-Jones, M., & Finardi, K.
    (2024) Out of the comfort zone: The trouble with virtual exchange. InJ. P. Davies, J. Rattray, A. Tierney, S. McGowan, E. Gironacci, A. Nyamapfene, & A. Webb (Eds.), Threshold concepts in the moment (pp. 307–325). Brill. 10.1163/9789004680661_020
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004680661_020 [Google Scholar]
  36. Orsini-Jones, M.
    (2024) BAAL-Cambridge University Press Seminar: Virtual exchange as an equality, diversity and inclusion compliant approach to language education: A global south-north research-informed seminar. BAAL Newsletter, Summer Edition (pp.5–6). https://www.baal.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/124_Summer_Edition_2024.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Orsini-Jones, M., Jacobs, L., Finardi, K., & Wimpenny, K.
    (2025) Collaborative online international learning as a postdigital connected, embodied, relational & (socio)material Third Space: Female voices. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(1), 237–252. 10.1080/07294360.2024.2429438
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2429438 [Google Scholar]
  38. Oskoz, A., Gimeno-Sanz, A., & Sevilla-Pavón, A.
    (2018) Examining L2 learners’ use of engagement strategies in telecollaborative written interactions. InB. Mousten, S. Vandepitte, E. Arnó, & B. Maylath. (Eds.), Multilingual writing and pedagogical cooperation in virtual learning environments (pp. 200–220). IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑5225‑4154‑7.ch008
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-4154-7.ch008 [Google Scholar]
  39. Patel, M., Solly, M., & Copeland, S.
    (2023) The future of English: Global perspectives. British Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Rubin, J.
    (2022) Preface to an evolving international educational landscape. InJ. Rubin, & S. Guth (Eds.), The guide to COIL virtual exchange: Implementing, growing, and sustaining collaborative online international learning. (pp. 3–18). Stylus Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Satar, H. M., & Akcan, S.
    (2018) Pre-service EFL teachers’ online participation, interaction, and social presence. Language Learning and Technology, 22(1), 157–183. 10.64152/10125/44586
    https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44586 [Google Scholar]
  42. Satar, M.
    (2021) Introducing virtual exchange: towards digital equity in internationalisation. InM. Satar (Ed.), Virtual exchange: Towards digital equity in internationalisation (pp. 1–13). Research-publishing.net. 10.14705/rpnet.2021.53.1285
    https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.53.1285 [Google Scholar]
  43. Selvi, A. F., Galloway, N., & Rose, H.
    (2023) Teaching English as an international language. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sevilla-Pavón, A.
    (2016) Affordances of telecollaboration tools for English for Specific Purposes online learning. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues. 8(3), 218–223. 10.18844/wjet.v8i3.696
    https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v8i3.696 [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith, L. E.
    (1976) English as an international auxiliary language. RELC Journal, 7(2), 38–42. 10.1177/003368827600700205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368827600700205 [Google Scholar]
  46. Swedberg, R.
    (2020) Exploratory research. InC. Elmon, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds), The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science. (pp. 17–41). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108762519.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.002 [Google Scholar]
  47. UNESCO
    UNESCO (2024) Global citizenship education: Fostering peace, inclusion and sustainable futures. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.unesco.org/en/global-citizenship-peace-education
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Ware, P.
    (2005) “Missed” communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 64–89. 10.64152/10125/44020
    https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44020 [Google Scholar]
  49. Weaver, G. C., McDonald, P. L., Louie, G. S., & Woodman, T. C.
    (2024) Future potentials for international virtual exchange in higher education post COVID-19: A scoping review. Educ. Sci. 141, 232. 10.3390/educsci14030232
    https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030232 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wells, J., Butt, F., Orsini-Jones, M., Borthwick, K., Preshous, A., Chen, Y. H., Thi Ngoc, T. B., Nguyen, H., Nguyen, T. T. & Duc Nguyen, A.
    (2022) A ViVEXELT (Viet Nam Virtual EXchange for English Language Teaching) guide for E-CIIC1 mediators in synchronous online Zoom breakout rooms. https://vivexelt.com/breakout-room-guide/
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu, Z.
    (2018) Exploring English as an international language — Curriculum, materials and pedagogical strategies. RELC Journal, 49(1), 102–118. 10.1177/0033688217753848
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217753848 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24042.che
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24042.che
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error