1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. AILA Review
  4. Volume 38, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 38, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1461-0213
  • E-ISSN: 1570-5595
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

(VE) refers to structured online collaborative learning between geographically and/or culturally diverse groups of students, aimed at fostering intercultural dialogue through digitally mediated project work. VE is a research-informed practice and serves as a valuable tool in advancing Internationalisation at Home (IaH) in Higher Education (HE), integrating intercultural dimensions into curricula, and expanding opportunities for global learning beyond physical mobility. However, despite its potential, we argue that VE is not inherently inclusive or equitable, as it is influenced by Western hegemonies and inequalities in access to technology, socio-economic and socio-political factors, and often also institutional constraints. Critical Virtual Exchange (CVE) has emerged in response to these concerns, focusing on addressing epistemic injustices, promoting inclusive participation, and aligning educational practices with global challenges, such as the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). CVE emphasises equitable access to technology, prioritises the needs of underrepresented students, and encourages the systematic integration of local contexts into global learning projects. CVE also advocates for translanguaging, thus promoting multilingualism and multimodal communication as essential components of intercultural exchanges. This article draws on Hauck’s CVE framework (Hauck, 2023; Hauck, 2025) and presents and interrogates the tenets of CVE. We use VE project examples from the Global South that “gesture towards” CVE involving HE institutions from Angola, Brazil, and Mexico to illustrate new opportunities in VE when focusing on equitable exchange student project work. Our predominantly conceptual contribution highlights the importance of VE project design that prioritises social justice, addresses power imbalances, and fosters socio-politically relevant intercultural dialogue, i.e., CVE, that can contribute to the decolonisation of HE in the shape of critical IaH.

© 2025 AILA
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24044.hau
2025-12-11
2026-01-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aila.24044.hau
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aila.24044.hau.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24044.hau&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alami, N., Albuquerque, J., Ashton, L., Elwood, J., Ewoodzie, K., Hauck, M., Karam, J., Klimanova, L., Nasr, R., & Satar, M.
    (2022) Marginalization and underrepresentation in virtual exchange: Reasons and remedies. Journal of International Students, 12(S3), 57–76. 10.32674/jis.v12iS3.4665
     https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12iS3.4665 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andreotti, V., & Menezes de Souza, L. M. T.
    (2008) Learning to read the world through other eyes. Global Education. https://developmenteducation.ie/media/documents/Learning_to_Read_the_World_Through_Other.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anidjar, G.
    (2023) LEARNING WATERS. Angelaki, 28(1), 99–110. 10.1080/0969725X.2023.2167788
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2023.2167788 [Google Scholar]
  4. Araújo e Sá, M. H., & Pinho, A. S. P.
    (Orgs.) (2015) Intercompreensão em contexto educativo: resultados da investigação. UA Editora — Universidade de Aveiro. https://www.miriadi.net/sites/default/files/livro-book_miriadi_-_v.01-08__final.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Arora-Jonsson, S.
    (2023) The sustainable development goals: A universalist promise for the future. Futures, Article 103087. 10.1016/j.futures.2022.103087
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103087 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beelen, J., & Jones, E.
    (2015) Redefining internationalization at home. InA. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi & P. Scott (Eds.), The European higher education area. Between critical reflections and future policies (pp. 59–72). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑20877‑0_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_5 [Google Scholar]
  7. Belz, J. A.
    (2003) Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68–117. hdl.handle.net/10125/25201. 10.64152/10125/25201
     https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/25201 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhargawa, R., & Bhargawa, M.
    (2023) The climate crisis disproportionately hits the poor. How can we protect them?World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/climate-crisis-poor-davos2023/#:~:text=The​%20​lowest​%20​income​%20​countries​%20​produce,and​%20​water%2C​%20​education​%20​and​%20​more
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Blicharska, M., Teutschbein, C., & Smithers, R. J.
    (2021) SDG partnerships may perpetuate the global North–South divide. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 2209. 10.1038/s41598‑021‑01534‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01534-6 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bock, Z., & Stroud, S.
    (Eds.) (2021) Language and decoloniality in higher education: Reclaiming voices from the South. Bloomsbury Academic. 10.1558/jld.23985
     https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.23985 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brasil. Ministério da Educação
    Brasil. Ministério da Educação (2017) A Internacionalização na Universidade Brasileira: resultados do questionário aplicado pela CAPES. Diretoria de Relações Internacionais. https://www.capes.gov.br/images/stories/download/diversos/A-internacionalizacao-nas-IES-brasileiras.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  12. BRaVE-Unesp
    BRaVE-Unesp (2025) Disciplinas já realizadas no BRaVE-Unesp. https://www2.unesp.br/portal#!/brave/disciplinas-realizadas/
  13. Canagarajah, S.
    (2013) Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203120293
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203120293 [Google Scholar]
  14. Capucho, F.
    (2004) Línguas e identidades culturais: da implicação de políticos e (socio) linguistas. A linguística que nos faz falhar (pp. 83–87).
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Clavijo Olarte, A., Medina, R. A., Calderon-Aponte, D., Rodríguez, A., Prieto, K., & Náder, M. C.
    (2023) Raising awareness of the city as a text: Multimodal, multicultural, and multilingual resources for education. InA. Salmon & A. Clavijo Olarte (Eds.), Handbook of research on socio-cultural and linguistic perspectives on language and literacy development (pp. 239–264). IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑6684‑5022‑2.ch013
     https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5022-2.ch013 [Google Scholar]
  16. Crawford, I.
    (2021) Employer perspectives on virtual international working: essential skills for the globalised, digital workplace. InS. Swartz, B. Barbosa, I. Crawford & S. Luck (Eds.). Developments in virtual learning environments and global workplace (pp. 178–204). IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑7998‑7331‑0.ch010
     https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7331-0.ch010 [Google Scholar]
  17. Darvin, R.
    (2016) Language and identity in the digital age. InS. Preece (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity (pp. 523–540). Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/open/detail.action?docID=4406288
     [Google Scholar]
  18. (2017) Language, Ideology, and Critical Digital Literacy. InS. Thorne & S. May (Eds.), Language, Education and Technology. Encyclopaedia of Language and Education (3rd ed.). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02237‑6_35
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02237-6_35 [Google Scholar]
  19. de Sousa Santos, B.
    (2007) Beyond abyssal thinking: From global lines to ecologies of knowledges. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 30(1), 45–89. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241677
     [Google Scholar]
  20. de Wit, H., & Altbach, P.
    (2021) 70 Years of Internationalization in Tertiary Education: Changes, Challenges and Perspectives. InH. van’t Land, A. Corcoran & D. C. Iancu (Eds.) The Promise of Higher Education (pp. 119–126). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑67245‑4_19
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67245-4_19 [Google Scholar]
  21. Diniz De Figueiredo, E. H., & Martinez, J.
    (2021) The locus of enunciation as a way to confront epistemological racism and decolonize scholarly knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 42(2), 355–359. 10.1093/applin/amz061
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz061 [Google Scholar]
  22. Donnelly, M.
    (2022) Non-university higher education: geographies of place, possibility and inequality: By Holly Henderson, London, Bloomsbury Academic Press, 2020, 224 pp., ISBN 978-1-350-14532-0 Hardback. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(8), 1297–1299. 10.1080/01425692.2022.2124941
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2124941 [Google Scholar]
  23. EVOLVE Project Team
    EVOLVE Project Team (2020) The impact of virtual exchange on student learning in higher education: EVOLVE Project Report. https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/the-impact-of-virtual-exchange-on-student-learning-in-higher-educ
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Finardi, K., França, C., & Guimarães, F.
    (2022) Ecology of knowledges and languages in Latin American academic production. Ensaio, 30(116), 764–787. 10.1590/s0104‑40362022003003538
     https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-40362022003003538 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fricker, M.
    (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford Academic. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. García, O., & Wei, L.
    (2014) Translanguaging. Language, Bilingualism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi-org.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/10.1057/9781137385765
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Guilherme, M., & Menezes de Souza, L. M. T.
    (2019) (Eds.). Glocal languages and critical intercultural awareness: the south answers back. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351184656
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351184656 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hauck, M.
    (2020) 15 September 2020. Towards global fairness in the digital space through VE 3rd International Virtual Exchange Conference (IVEC), Newcastle University, retrieved on11 January 2025, fromhttps://iveconference.org/2020-conference/
     [Google Scholar]
  29. (2023) From Virtual Exchange to Critical Virtual Exchange and Critical Internationalization at Home. The Global Impact Exchange, 2023(Spring), 9–12. https://imis.daglobal.org/public/DIVaPublic/GIE-Archives/GIE-2023/GIE-Sp2023/GIE-Sp23-Article-1.aspx
     [Google Scholar]
  30. (2025) Critical Virtual Exchange: At the interface of Critical CALL, Critical Digital Literacy, and Critical Global Citizenship Education. InE. Britton, A. Kraemer, T. Austin, H. Liu & X. Zuo (Eds.), Advancing Critical CALL across Institutions and Borders (pp.291–54). Sheffield: Equinox. 10.3138/9781487567255‑005
     https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487567255-005 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hauck, M., & Satar, M.
    (2018) Learning and Teaching Languages in Technology Mediated Contexts — The Relevance of Social Presence, Co-Presence, Participatory Literacy, and Multimodal Competence. InR. Kern, & C. Develotte (Eds.), Screens and Scenes: multimodal communication in online intercultural encounters (pp. 133–157). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315447124‑7
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315447124-7 [Google Scholar]
  32. Helm, F.
    (2015) The practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 197–217. llt.msu.edu/issues/june2015/helm.pdf. 10.64152/10125/44424
     https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44424 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2020) EMI, internationalisation, and the digital. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 314–325. 10.1080/13670050.2019.1643823
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1643823 [Google Scholar]
  34. Helm, F., & Hauck, M.
    (2022) Language, identity and positioning in virtual exchange. InL. Klimanova (Ed), Identity, Multilingualism and CALL: Responding to New Global Realities (pp. 24–48). Advances in CALL Research and Practice. Sheffield: Equinox. 10.1558/equinox.43408
     https://doi.org/10.1558/equinox.43408 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jiang, L., & Gu, M. M.
    (2022) Toward a Professional Development Model for Critical Digital Literacies in TESOL, TESOL Quarterly, 56(3), 1029–1040. https://doi-org.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/10.1002/tesq.3138. 10.1002/tesq.3138
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3138 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kastler, K., & Lewis, H.
    (2021) Approaching VE through an equity lens. Global Impact Exchange. diversityabroad.org. https://globallearning.agnesscott.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Final_Global-Impact-Exchange-Summer-2021-Edition.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kerr, J., & Andreotti, V.
    (2018) Recognizing more-than-human relations in social justice research: Gesturing towards decolonial possibilities. Issues in Teacher Education, 27(2), 53–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Klimanova, L., & Hellmich, E. A.
    (2021) Crossing transcultural liminalities with critical virtual exchange: A study of shifting border discourses. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 18(3), 273–304. 10.1080/15427587.2020.1867552
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2020.1867552 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kress, G.
    (2003) Literacy in the new media age. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203299234
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299234 [Google Scholar]
  40. Martins, S. A.
    (2010) L’intercompréhension des langues romanes au service de l’amélioration de l’enseignement des langues au Brésil. Synergies Brésil, suppl. Special Issue1, 107–114. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2561984192?parentSessionId=KNze63z7EdeMbW2y7cGCWmVW1BcgSzUxxBbOOy2%2BYyE%3D&pq-origsite=primo&accountid=14697&sourcetype=Scholarly​%20​Journals
     [Google Scholar]
  41. (2014) A intercompreensão de línguas românicas: proposta propulsora de uma educação plurilíngue. MOARA–Revista Eletrônica do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras, (42), 117–126.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Mirra, N., & Garcia, A.
    (2020) “I hesitate but I DO Have Hope”: Youth speculative civic literacies for troubled times. Harvard Educational Review, 90(2), 295–321. https://doi-org.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/10.17763/1943-5045-90.2.295. 10.17763/1943‑5045‑90.2.295
     https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-90.2.295 [Google Scholar]
  43. Morgan, R., Dhatt, R., Kharel, C., & Muraya, K.
    (2020) A patchwork approach to gender equality weakens the SDGs: time for cross-cutting action. Global Health Promotion, 27(3), 3–5. https://doi-org.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/10.1177/175797592094973. 10.1177/1757975920949735
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975920949735 [Google Scholar]
  44. Nicolaou, A.
    (2021) Technological mediation in a global competence virtual exchange project: A critical digital literacies perspective. InS. Papadima Sophocleous, C. Kakoulli & C. N. Giannikas (Eds.), Tertiary education language learning: A collection of research (pp. 111–131). Research-publishing.net. 10.14705/rpnet.2021.51.1257
     https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.51.1257 [Google Scholar]
  45. O’Dowd, R.
    (2018) From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: State-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 11, 1–23. Research-publishing.net. 10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1
     https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2023) Issues of equity and inclusion in Virtual Exchange. Plenary Speech. Language Teaching, 1–13. 10.1017/S026144482300040X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482300040X [Google Scholar]
  47. O’Dowd, R., & Beelen, J.
    (2021) Virtual exchange and Internationalisation at Home: Navigating the terminology. EAIE Blog & Podcast. https://www.eaie.org/resource/virtual-exchange-iah-terminology.html
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Reljanovic Glimäng, M.
    (2024) Reading the world through virtual exchange: critical interculturality and glocal awareness in English teacher education [Doctoral dissertation, Malmö University Press]. 10.24834/isbn.9789178774661
     https://doi.org/10.24834/isbn.9789178774661
  49. Salomão, A. C. B.
    (2022) Foreign Language Communication in Virtual Exchanges: Reflections and Implications for Applied Linguistics. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 1–14. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.4018/IJCALLT.307061. 10.4018/IJCALLT.307061
     https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.307061 [Google Scholar]
  50. Salomão, A. C. B., & Freire, J. C.
    (2020) Perspectivas de internacionalização em casa: intercâmbio virtual por meio do Programa BRaVE-UNESP. Cultura Acadêmica Editora. hdl.handle.net/11449/202860
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Satar, M., Aranha, S., Cavalari, S. M. S., & Almijiwl, W.
    (2024) Low proficiency level learners’ translingual and transmodal practices in teletandem: Challenging the separation of languages principle. System, 1201, 103187. 10.1016/j.system.2023.103187
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103187 [Google Scholar]
  52. Satar, M., Hauck, M. & Bilki, Z.
    (2023) Multimodal representation in virtual exchange: A social semiotic approach to critical digital literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 72–96. 10.64152/10125/73504
     https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73504 [Google Scholar]
  53. Satar, M. & Hauck, M.
    (2022) Exploring digital equity in online learning communities. InA. M. Sousa Aguiar de Medeiros & D. Kelly (Eds.), Language debates: Digital media (pp. 270–290). John Murray Learning. 10.21827/jve.5.38369
     https://doi.org/10.21827/jve.5.38369 [Google Scholar]
  54. Selwyn, N., & Facer, K.
    (2013) Introduction: The need for a politics of education and technology. InN. Selwyn & K. Facer (Eds.), The politics of education and technology (pp. 1–17). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137031983_1
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031983_1 [Google Scholar]
  55. Sevilla-Pavón, A., & Nicolaou, A.
    (2022) Artefact co-construction in virtual exchange: “Youth Entrepreneurship for Society.” Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 35(7), 1642–1667. 10.1080/09588221.2020.1825096
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1825096 [Google Scholar]
  56. Stein, S., Andreotti, V., Suša, R., Amsler, S., Hunt, D., Ahenakew, C., & Okano, H.
    (2020) Gesturing towards decolonial futures: Reflections on our learnings thus far. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 4(1), 43–65. 10.7577/njcie.3518
     https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3518 [Google Scholar]
  57. Telles, J. A., & Vassallo, M. L.
    (2006) Foreign language learning in-tandem: Teletandem as an alternative proposal in CALLT. The ESPecialist, 2(27), 189–212. https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/esp/article/view/1629
     [Google Scholar]
  58. United Nations
    United Nations (2012) Indigenous peoples, indigenous voices–Factsheet. InUnited Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/5session_factsheet1.pdf
  59. United Nations
    United Nations (2015) Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/publications/transforming-our-world-2030-agenda-sustainable-development-17981
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Wimpenny, K., Finardi, K. R., Orsini-Jones, M., & Jacobs, L.
    (2022) Knowing, being, relating and expressing through Third Space Global South–North COIL: Digital inclusion and equity in international higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 26(2), 279–296. 10.1177/10283153221094085
     https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153221094085 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24044.hau
Loading
Internationalisation at Home through Critical Virtual Exchange
AILA Review 38, 262 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24044.hau
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24044.hau
/content/journals/10.1075/aila.24044.hau
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): collaborative learning; decolonisation; equity; inclusion; internationalisation at home; social justice; virtual exchange

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error