oa Reflexivity and social change in applied linguistics

References

1. Agha, A.
   2007 Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: CUP.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Archer, M.
   2003 Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139087315
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087315 [Google Scholar]
3. Archer, M.
   2007 Making our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511618932
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618932 [Google Scholar]
4. Archer, M.
   2010 Conversations about Reflexivity. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Archer, M.
   2012 The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139108058
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108058 [Google Scholar]
6. Austin, J.
   1962 How to do Things with Words. Oxford: OUP.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bauman, R.
   1977 Verbal art as Performance. Long Grove IL: Waveland Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bauman, R. & Briggs C. L.
   1990 Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology19: 59–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423 [Google Scholar]
9. Bakhtin, M.
   1981 The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bakhtin, M.
    1986 Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Beck, U.
    1992 Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Blommaert, J.
    2005 Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511610295
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610295 [Google Scholar]
13. Blommaert, J.
    2010 The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511845307
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307 [Google Scholar]
14. Blommaert, J. & Rampton, B.
    2016 Language and superdiversity. InLanguage and Superdiversity, K. Arnaut , J. Blommaert , B. Rampton & M. Spotti (eds), 21–48. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Briggs, C. & Bauman, R
    1992 Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology2 (2): 131–72. doi: 10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131 [Google Scholar]
16. Brumfit, C.
    1995 Teacher professionalism and research. InPrinciples and Practice in Applied Linguistics, G. Cook & B. Seidlehofer (eds), 27–41. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bourdieu, P.
    1992 The practice of reflexive sociology (The Paris Workshop). InAn Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, P. Bourdieu & L. J. D. Wacquant (eds), 217–260. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Canagarajah, S.
    2013 Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. New York NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Castells, M.
    1997 The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol.II: The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Clark, J. B. & Dervin, F.
    2014 Reflexivity in Language and Intercultural Education: Rethinking Multilingualism and Interculturality. New York NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Duchêne, A. , Moyer, Roberts & Roberts, C.
    2013 Language, Migration and Social Inequalities: A Critical Sociolinguistic Perspective on Institutions and Work. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Erickson, F.
    1992 Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. InThe Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, M. LeCompte , W. Millroy & J. Preissle (eds), 201–225. New York NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Giampapa, F. & Lamoureux, S.
    2011 Introduction. Voices from the field: Identity, language, and power in multilingual research settings. Journal of Language, Identity and Education10 (3): 127–131. doi: 10.1080/15348458.2011.585301
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2011.585301 [Google Scholar]
24. Giddens, A.
    1991 Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Goffman, E.
    1967 Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York NY: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Goffman, E.
    1974 Frame Analysis: An Essay in the Organization of Experience. New York NY: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Goffman, E.
    1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gumperz, J.
    1982 Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
29. Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D.
    1972 Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hanks
    1987 Discourse genres in a theory of practice. American Ethnologist14 (4): 668–692. doi: 10.1525/ae.1987.14.4.02a00050
    https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1987.14.4.02a00050 [Google Scholar]
31. Heller, M.
    2002 Éléments d’une sociolinguistique critique. Paris: Hatier.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Heller, M
    2011 E-seminar” (May 4–23, 2011), in collaboration with UK Linguistic Ethnography Forum (UKLEF), involving Professor Monica Heller (Univ. of Toronto) and Professor Melissa Moyer (Autonomous Univ. of Barcelona). www.uklef.net
33. Hymes, D.
    1974 Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hymes, D.
    1996 Ethnopoetics and sociolinguistics. InEthnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality, D. Hymes (ed.), 165–184. Bristol: Taylor and Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Jaffe, A.
    (ed.) 2009 Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
36. Lillis, T.
    2015 Introduction. AILA Review28: 1–6. doi: 10.1075/aila.28.001int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.001int [Google Scholar]
37. Lucy, J. A.
    1993 Reflexive Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031 [Google Scholar]
38. Martín-Rojo, L.
    2010 Constructing Inequality in Multilingual Classrooms. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110226645
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226645 [Google Scholar]
39. O’Rourke, B. , Pujolar, J. & Ramallo, F.
    2015 New speakers of minority languages: The challenging opportunity. International Journal of the Sociology of Language231: 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Pennycook, A.
    2012 Language and Mobility. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Pérez-Milans, M.
    2015 Language education policy in late modernity: (Socio) linguistic ethnographies in the European Union. Language Policy14 (2): 99–108. doi: 10.1007/s10993‑014‑9354‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9354-7 [Google Scholar]
42. Rampton, B.
    2006 Language in Late Modernity. Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486722
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486722 [Google Scholar]
43. Roberts, C.
    2003 Applied linguistics applied. InApplied Linguistics and Communities of Practice, S. Sarangi & T. van Leeuwen (eds), 132–49. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E. & Jerfferson, G.
    1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
45. Sarangi, S. & Candlin, C. N.
    2003 Trading between reflexivity and relevance: New challenges for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics24 (3): 271–285. doi: 10.1093/applin/24.3.271
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.3.271 [Google Scholar]
46. Sarangi, S. & Candlin, C. N.
    2003 Making applied linguistics matter. Journal of Applied Linguistics1 (1): 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Scollon, R. & Scollon, S.
    2003 Discourse in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
48. Searle, J.
    1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
49. Silverstein, M.
    1976 “Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description”. In Meaning and anthropology, Basso & Selby (eds), 11–55. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Silverstein, M.
    1985 On the pragmatic ‘poetry’ of prose. InMeaning, Form and Use in Context, D. Schiffrin (ed.), 181–199. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Silverstein, M.
    2003 Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication23: 193–229. doi: 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
52. Starfield S.
    2013 Researcher reflexivity. InThe Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, C. A. Chapelle (ed.), 1–7. Malden MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Verschueren, J.
    1999 Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]