1887
Volume 29, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1461-0213
  • E-ISSN: 1570-5595

Abstract

This paper studies reflexivity in interaction among adolescents in Helsinki in the light of stylised performances that are labelled by participants as “bad Finnish”. can be seen as an enregistered discourse register. It is an emblem in which certain linguistic features are connected to ideas about certain kinds of people and their characteristics. In particular, is an indexical for social personae associated with “immigrants”, “foreigners” and non-native Finnish. The participants in this study came to Finland as children and learned Finnish as a second (or third or fourth) language, and they still have to face the excluding attitudes of the society. With their stylised performances and in their reactions to them, the participants position themselves with regard to the social personae indexed by , their stereotypical characteristics and the wider societal discourses that touch upon themselves. is sometimes used for expressing distance from stereotypical immigrants, but sometimes for displaying solidarity with those who share the experiences of immigration and learning Finnish. Although it also works as a trope, seemingly detached from ethnicity, in interaction with native Finns it may still be delicate because of its pejorative social indexical potential.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aila.29.02leh
2017-01-30
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aila.29.02leh.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/aila.29.02leh&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Agha, A.
    2007 Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: CUP.
  2. Auer, P.
    1992 Introduction: John Gumperz’ approach to contextualization. InThe Contextualization of Language [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 22], P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (eds.), 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.22.03aue
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.03aue [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, M.
    1981The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bahtin, M.
    1986 The problem of speech genres. InSpeech Genres and Other Late Essays, 60–102. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blommaert, J.
    2010The Sociolinguistics of Globalization [Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact]. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511845307
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blommaert, J. & Backus, A.
    2011 ‘Knowing language’ in superdiversity [Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 67]. www.academia.edu/6365319/WP67_Blommaert_and_Backus_2011._Repertoires_revisited_Knowing_language_in_superdiversity (1 July 2016).
  7. Blommaert, J. & Dong, J.
    2010 Language and movement in space. InThe Handbook of Language and Globalization, N. Coupland (ed.), 367–385. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444324068.ch16
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444324068.ch16 [Google Scholar]
  8. Coupland, N.
    2007Style. Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511755064
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755064 [Google Scholar]
  9. (ed.) 2010The Handbook of Language and Globalization. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444324068
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444324068 [Google Scholar]
  10. Coupland, N. & Jaworski, A.
    2004 Sociolinguistic perspectives on metalanguage: Reflexivity, evaluation and ideology. InMetalanguage. Social and Ideological Perspectives [Language, Power and Social Processes 11], A. Jaworski , N. Coupland & D. Galasiński (eds), 15–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110907377.15
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377.15 [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies, B. & Harré, R.
    1990 Positioning: ‘The discursive production of selves’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour20 (1): 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑5914.1990.tb00174.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferguson, C.
    1975 Toward a characterization of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics17 (1): 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gumperz, J.
    1982aDiscourse Strategies [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 1]. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  14. 1982bLanguage and Social Identity [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 2]. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1992 Contextualization revisited. InThe Contextualization of Language [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 22], P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (eds), 39–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.22.04gum
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.04gum [Google Scholar]
  16. Goffman, E.
    1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Haikkola, L.
    2012: Monipaikkainen nuoruus. Toinen sukupolvi, transnationaalisuus ja identiteetit. ’Multisited Youth. Second generation, transnationalism and identities’. The Department of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki.
  18. Hall, S.
    1989 New ethnicities. InCritical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, D. Morley & K. Hsin-Cheng (eds), 441–449. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Harris, R.
    2006New Ethnicities and Language Use. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230626461
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626461 [Google Scholar]
  20. Heller, M.
    2008 Language and the nation-state: Challenges to sociolinguistic theory and practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics12 (4): 504–524. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00373.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00373.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Helsinki Region Infoshare
    Helsinki Region Infoshare. www.hri.fi/en/
  22. Huttunen, L.
    2009 Mikä ihmeen maahanmuuttaja? A blogpost in the blog En ole rasisti, mutta… Maahanmuutosta, monikulttuurisuudesta ja kritiikistä. enolerasisti.wordpress.com/2009/12/30/laura-huttunen-mika-ihmeen-maahanmuuttaja/ (15 November 2014).
  23. Jaffe, A.
    (ed.) 2009Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kaukomaa, T. , Peräkylä, A. & Ruusuvuori, J.
    2015 How listeners use facial expression to shift the emotional stance of the speaker’s utterance. Research on Language and Social Interaction48 (3): 319–341. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2015.1058607
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1058607 [Google Scholar]
  25. Keim, I.
    2008[2007]‘Die türkischen Powergirls’. Lebenswelt und kommunikativer Stil einer Migrantinnengruppe in Mannheim [Studien zur Deutschen Sprache 39], 2nd edn.Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Korkiasaari, J. & Söderling, I.
    2003 Finnish emigration and immigration after the World War II. Finnish Immigration Institute. www.migrationinstitute.fi/fi/tietopalvelut/artikkelit-esitelmat#quicktabs-fi_tietopalvelut_esitelmat=1 (28 February 2016).
  27. Labov, W.
    1972Sociolinguistic Patterns. Oxford: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lappalainen, H.
    2004Variaatio ja sen funktiot. Erään sosiaalisen verkoston jäsenten kielellisen vuorovaikutuksen tarkastelua (Variation and its functions. Analysing interaction of a social network). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lehtonen, H.
    2006 Morfologinen variaatio maahanmuuttajataustaisten helsinkiläisnuorten puheessa (Morphological variation in the speech of adolescents with immigrant background in Helsinki). InHelsinki kieliyhteisönä (Helsinki as a linguistic community), K. Juusela & K. Nisula (eds), 255–274. Helsinki: Department of Finnish and Finnish literature, University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2011 Developing multiethnic youth language in Helsinki. InEthnic Styles of Speaking in European Metropolitan Areas [Studies in Language Variation 8], F. Kern & M. Selting (eds), 291–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/silv.8.12leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.8.12leh [Google Scholar]
  31. 2015a Tyylitellen. Nuorten kielelliset resurssit ja kielen sosiaalinen indeksisyys monietnisessä Helsingissä (Stylising. Linguistic resources of adolescents and the social indexicality of language in multi-ethnic Helsinki). Helsinki: Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/155659
  32. 2015bSano vai sanoi – mitä merkitystä on yhdellä i: llä? Jälkitavujen i-loppuisen diftongin sosiaalinen indeksisyys monietnistyvässä Helsingissä ( Sano or sanoi – the meaning of an i’ ). InHelsingissä puhuttavat suomet. Kielen indeksisyys ja sosiaaliset identiteetit (Finnishes spoken in Helsinki. The indexicality of language and social identities). M.-L. Sorjonen , A. Rouhikoski & H. Lehtonen (eds), 84–123. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Migri – The Finnish Immigration Service
    Migri – The Finnish Immigration ServiceTurvapaikka- ja pakolaistilastot. www.migri.fi/tietoa_virastosta/tilastot/turvapaikka-_ja_pakolaistilastot (29 February 2016).
  34. Ochs, E.
    1992 Indexing gender. InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (eds) 335–358. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Paunonen, H.
    [1982]1995Suomen kieli Helsingissä. Huomioita Helsingin puhekielen taustasta ja nykyvariaatiosta (Finnish in Helsinki. About the development and the variation of spoken Finnish in Helsinki). Helsinki: Department of Finnish, University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rampton, B.
    1995Crossing. Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2006Language in Late Modernity. Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486722
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486722 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sacks, H.
    1992aLectures on Conversation, Vol.I, G. Jefferson (ed.). Cambridge MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 1992bLectures on Conversation, Vol.II, G. Jefferson (ed.). Cambridge MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Silverstein, M.
    2003 Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication23: 193–229. doi: 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
  41. Somalis in Helsinki
    Somalis in Helsinki 2013 Open Society Foundations. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/somalis-helsinki-20131121.pdf (1 July 2016).
  42. Sorjonen, M.-L.
    2001Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.70
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.70 [Google Scholar]
  43. Statistics Finland: Population
    Statistics Finland: Population. www.stat.fi/til/vrm_en.html (29 February 2016).
  44. Suurpää, L.
    2002Erilaisuuden hierarkiat. Suomalaisia käsityksiä maahanmuuttajista, suvaitsevaisuudesta ja rasismista (Hierarchies of difference. Finnish conceptualisations about immigrants, tolerance, and racism). Helsinki: Finnish Youth Research Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Tainio, L.
    2008 Toisten puhujien matkiminen luokkahuoneessa (Imitating other speakers in the classroom). InNuoret kielikuvassa. Kouluikäisten kieli 2000-luvulla (Picturing youth. The language of school pupils in the 2000’s), S. Routarinne & T. Uusi-Hallila (eds), 146–164. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Valdman, A.
    1981 Sociolinguistics aspects of foreigner talk. International Journal of the Sociology of Language28: 41–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Visakko, T.
    2015Self-promotion as Semiotic Behaviour. The Mediation of Personhood in Light of Finnish Online Dating Advertisements. Helskini: Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aila.29.02leh
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error