Volume 29, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1461-0213
  • E-ISSN: 1570-5595


This article engages with Archer’s call to further research on reflexivity and social change under conditions of late modernity ( 2007 , 2010 , 2012 ) from the perspective of existing work on reflexive discourse in the language disciplines ( Silverstein 1976 , Lucy 1993 ). Drawing from a linguistic ethnography of the networked trajectories of a group of working-class South Asian youth in Hong Kong ( Pérez-Milans & Soto 2014 ), we analyze the trajectory of Sita, a Hong Kong-born young female with Nepali background. In her trajectory, performative acts of ethnic minority-based activism emerge as key in the enactment of a given set of values, stances, types of persona and situated forms of alignment/disalignment. That is to say, Sita’s enactment of activism is seen in this article as tied to a discourse register ( Agha 2007 : 147). As such, ‘talking/doing activism’ is inter-textually linked to a speech chain network of a group of secondary school students, teachers, researchers and community-based minority activists engaged with Sita in various interrelated projects for social empowerment. Analysis of interview transcripts, online chats and multimodal artifacts shows the extent to which the coordinated formation of this discourse register proved useful in providing Sita with relevant cultural capital ( Bourdieu 1986 ) with which she shaped her own academic trajectory, from a low-prestige government-subsidized secondary school to an elite international college. Data also point towards the need for further engagement with recent invitations to re-imagining identity and social action under current conditions of diversification ( Blommaert 2013 ).


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Agha, A.
    2005 Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology15 (1): 38–59. doi: 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2007Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Appadurai, A.
    1990 Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture and Society7 (2): 295–310. doi: 10.1177/026327690007002017
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026327690007002017 [Google Scholar]
  4. Archer, M. S.
    2007Making our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511618932
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618932 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2010 Routine, reflexivity, and realism. Sociological Theory28 (3): 272–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9558.2010.01375.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01375.x [Google Scholar]
  6. 2012The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139108058
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108058 [Google Scholar]
  7. Austin, J.
    1962How to do Things with Words. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bakhtin, M.
    1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bauman, Z.
    1998Globalization: The Human Consequences. New York NY: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Beck, U.
    1992Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Blommaert, J.
    2010The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511845307
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2013Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes. Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2016 Commentary: Indonesia, its youth and ‘light communities’ [Tilburg Working Papers in Culture Studies, Paper 162]. https://www.tilburguniversity.edu
  14. 2016b New forms of diaspora, new forms of integration [Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, Paper 160]. https://www.tilburguniversity.edu
  15. Bourdieu, P.
    1986 The forms of capital. InHandbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, J. Richardson (ed.), 241–258. NewYork NY: Greenwood.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. J.
    1992An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Caetano, A.
    2014 Defining personal reflexivity: A critical reading of Archer’s approach. European Journal of Social Theory18 (1): 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Copland, F. & Creese, A.
    2015Linguistic Ethnography. Collecting, Analysing and Presenting Data. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781473910607
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473910607 [Google Scholar]
  19. Creese, A.
    2008 Linguistic ethnography. InEncyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol.10: Research Methods in Language and Education, 2nd edn, K. A. King & N. H. Hornberger (eds), 229–241. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑30424‑3_257
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_257 [Google Scholar]
  20. Duchêne, A. , Moyer, M. & Roberts, C.
    2013Language, Migration and Social Inequalities: A Critical Sociolinguistic Perspective on Institutions and Work. London: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Erni, J. N. & Leung, L. Y. M.
    2014Understanding South Asian Minorities in Hong Kong, Vol.1. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. doi: 10.5790/hongkong/9789888208340.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888208340.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fleming, K.
    2015 Ideology, Identity and Linguistic Repertoires among South Asian Students in Hong Kong. PhD dissertation, The University of Hong Kong. hdl.handle.net/10722/222399 doi: 10.5353/th_b5689270
  23. Flowerdew, J.
    2004 The discursive construction of a world-class city. Discourse & Society15 (5): 579–605. doi: 10.1177/0957926504045033
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504045033 [Google Scholar]
  24. Giddens, A.
    1991Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Goffman, E.
    1956Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York NY: Touchstone.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gumperz, J.
    1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  28. Heller, M.
    2002Éléments d’une sociolinguistique critique. Paris: Hatier.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2007 Distributed knowledge, distributed power: A sociolinguistics of structuration. Text & Talk27 (5–6): 633–653. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2007.029
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.029 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hymes, D.
    1974Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Pennsylvania PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kennedy, K. J.
    2012 Immigration and Hong Kong: ‘New Immigrants’ and Ethnic Minorities. UNESCO-KEDI Regional Policy Seminar – Education Policy: Making in the Age of Migration in Asia and the Pacific, July.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kubota, R.
    2014 The Multi/Plural turn, postcolonial theory, and neoliberal multiculturalism: Complicities and implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 1–22. doi: 10.1093/applin/amu045
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu045 [Google Scholar]
  33. Leung, Y. Y. M.
    2013 Education Reform in Hong Kong: Power-status, School Strategy and Social Inequality. PhD dissertation, The University of Hong Kong. hdl.handle.net/1783.1/62278
  34. Lucy, J. A.
    1993Reflexive Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031 [Google Scholar]
  35. Martín-Rojo, L.
    2010Constructing Inequality in Multilingual Classrooms. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110226645
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226645 [Google Scholar]
  36. Maly, I. & Varis, P.
    2015 The 21st-century hipster: On micro-populations in times of superdiversity. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 1–17. doi: 10.1177/1367549415597920
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415597920 [Google Scholar]
  37. May, S.
    (ed.) 2014The Multilingual Turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and Bilingual Education. New York NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pérez-Milans, M.
    2015 Language education policy in late modernity: (Socio) linguistic ethnographies in the European Union. Language Policy14 (2): 99–107. doi: 10.1007/s10993‑014‑9354‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9354-7 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2016 Language and identity in linguistic ethnography. InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity, S. Preece (ed.), 83–97. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pérez-Milans, M. & Soto, C.
    2014 Everyday practices, everyday pedagogies: A dialogue on critical transformations in a multilingual Hong Kong school. InReflexivity in Language and Intercultural Education: Rethinking Multilingualism and Interculturality, J. Byrd Clark & F. Dervin (eds), 213–233. New York NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Rampton, B.
    1995Crossing Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2006Language in Late Modernity. Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486722
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486722 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rampton, B. , Tusting, K. , Maybin, J. , Barwell, R. , Creese, A. & Lytra, V.
    2004 UK linguistic ethnography: A discussion paper. www.Ling-ethnog.org.uk
  44. Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G.
    1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  45. Silverstein, M.
    1976 Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. InMeaning and Anthropology, Keith H. Basso & Henry A. Selby (eds). New York NY: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2005 Axes of evals: Token versus type interdiscursivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology15 (1): 6–22. doi: 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.6
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.6 [Google Scholar]
  47. Soto, C.
    2016 Empowering Low-income Ethnic Minority Students in Hong Kong through Critical Pedagogy: Limits and Possibilities in Theory and Practice. PhD dissertation, The University of Hong Kong. hdl.handle.net/10722/223611
  48. Tusting, K. & Maybin, J.
    2007 Linguistic ethnography and interdisciplinarity: Opening the discussion. Journal of Sociolinguistics11 (5): 575–583. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00340.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00340.x [Google Scholar]
  49. Urciuoli, B.
    2003 Excellence, leadership, skills, diversity: Marketing liberal arts education. Language & Communication23: 385–408. doi: 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00014‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00014-4 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wortham, S. E.
    2005 Socialization beyond the speech event. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology15 (1): 95–112. doi: 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.95
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.95 [Google Scholar]
  51. Wortham, S.
    2006Learning Identity: The Joint Emergence of Social Identification and Academic Learning. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error