Volume 29, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1461-0213
  • E-ISSN: 1570-5595
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Agha, A.
    2007Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Archer, M.
    2012The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139108058
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108058 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, M.
    1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, C. Emerson & M. Holquist (trans, ed.). Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauman, R. & Briggs, C.
    2003Voices of Modernity. Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486647
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486647 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauman, Z.
    1987Legislators and Interpreters. Ithaca CA: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beck, U.
    1994 The reinvention of politics. Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. InReflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, U. Beck , A. Giddens & S. Lash (eds), 1–55. Palo Alto CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Beck, U. & Beck-Gernsheim, E.
    2002Individualization. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bernstein, B.
    1977Towards a Theory of Educational Transmission. Class, Codes and Control, Vol.3, 2nd edn.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Block, D.
    2014Social Class in Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bucholtz, M.
    2011White Kids. Language, Race and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Caetano, A.
    2014 Defining personal reflexivity. A critical reading of Archer’s approach. European Journal of Social Theory18 (1): 60–75. doi: 10.1177/1368431014549684
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014549684 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carr, E. S.
    2006 ‘Secrets keep you sick’: Metalinguistic labor in a drug treatment program for homeless women. Language in Society35 (5): 631–653. doi: 10.1017/S0047404506060301
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060301 [Google Scholar]
  13. Collini, S.
    2012What are Universities for?London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Coupland, N.
    2003 ‘Other’ representation. InHandbook of Pragmatics, J. Verschueren , J.-O. Östman , J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Coupland, N. & Jaworski, A.
    2004 Sociolinguistic perspectives on metalanguage: Reflexivity, evaluation and ideology. InMetalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives, A. Jaworski , N. Coupland & D. Galasinski (eds), 15–51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110907377.15
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377.15 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cutler, C.
    1999 Yorkville crossing. White teens, hip hop and African American English. Journal of Sociolinguistics3 (4): 428–442. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00089
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00089 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dawson, M.
    2010 Bauman, Beck, Giddens and our understanding of politics in late modernity. Journal of Power3 (2): 189–207. doi: 10.1080/17540291.2010.493698
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17540291.2010.493698 [Google Scholar]
  18. De Costa, P. , Tigchelaar, M. & Cui, Y.
    2016 Reflexivity and transnational habitus: The case of a ‘poor’ affluent Chinese international student. AILA Review29(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fabian, J.
    1983Time and the Other. How Anthropology Makes its Object. New York NY: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Freeman-Moir, J. & Scott, A.
    2003Yesterday’s Dreams. Christchurch NZ: Canterbury University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. García, O. & Wei, L.
    2014Translanguaging. Language, Bilingualism and Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Garfinkel, H.
    1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Giddens, A.
    1976New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. London: Hutchinson.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1984The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1994 Living in a post-traditional society. InReflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, U. Beck , A. Giddens & S. Lash (eds), 56–109. Palo Alto CA: Stanford University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hambye, P. & Siroux, J.-L.
    2008 Langage et “culture de la rue” en milieu scolaire. Sociologie et Sociétés40 (2): 217–237. doi: 10.7202/000672ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/000672ar [Google Scholar]
  27. Jaspers, J.
    2011a Interactional sociolinguistics and discourse analysis. InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, J. P. Gee & M. Handford (eds), 135–146. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2011b Talking like a zero-lingual. Ambiguous linguistic caricatures at an urban secondary school. Journal of Pragmatics43 (5): 1264–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2017, to appear. Language education policy and sociolinguistics. Toward a new critical engagement. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning, J. Tollefson & M. Perez-Milans (eds). Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jaspers, J. & Madsen, L. M.
    2016 Sociolinguistics in a languagised world: Introduction. Applied Linguistics Review7 (3): 235–258. doi: 10.1515/applirev‑2016‑0010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-0010 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kermode, F.
    2000 The Sense of an Ending. Oxford: OUP.
  32. Kompridis, N.
    2006Critique and Disclosure. Critical Theory between Past and Future. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kramsch, C.
    2015 Applied linguistics: A theory of the practice. Applied Linguistics36 (4): 454–465. doi: 10.1093/applin/amv039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv039 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lehtonen, H.
    2016 Troping on prejudice: Stylised “bad Finnish” performances and reflexivity among adolescents in Eastern Helsinki. AILA Review29 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lilis, T.
    2015 Introduction. AILA Review28: 1–6. doi: 10.1075/aila.28.001int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.001int [Google Scholar]
  36. Löwith, K.
    1949Meaning in History. The Theological Implications of the Philosophy of History. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lu, L.
    2016 Academically elite students in Singapore: A collective moral stance toward aspirations and trajectories. AILA Review29 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  38. McKnight, S. A.
    1990 The legitimacy of the modern age: The Löwith-Blumenberg debate in light of recent scholarship. The Political Science Reviewer19 (1): 177–195.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Marsh, J.
    2011Class Dismissed. New York NY: Monthly Review Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Moore, R.
    2007Sociology of Knowledge and Education. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Parsons, T.
    1937The Structure of Social Action. New York NY: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Patiño-Santos, A.
    2016 Trapped in a moral order: Moral identity, positioning and reflexivity in stories of confrontation among Latin American teenage school girls in Madrid. AILA Review29 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Pérez-Milans, M.
    2016 Reflexivity and social change in applied linguistics. AILA Review29 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pérez-Milans, M. & Soto, C.
    2016 Reflexive language and ethnic minority activism in Hong Kong: A trajectory-based analysis. AILA Review29 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rampton, B.
    2006 Language in Late Modernity. Interaction at an Urban School. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486722
  46. Reay, D.
    2006 The zombie stalking English schools. Social class and educational Inequality. British Journal of Educational Studies54 (3): 288–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑8527.2006.00351.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00351.x [Google Scholar]
  47. 2010 Sociology, social class and education. InThe Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Education, M. W. Apple , S. J. Ball & L. A. Gandin (eds), 396–404. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Reay, D. , Hollingworth, S. , Williams, K. , Crozier, G. , Jamieson, F. , James, D. & Beedell, P.
    2007 ‘A darker shade of pale?’ Whiteness, the middle classes and multi-ethnic inner city schooling. Sociology41 (6): 1041–1060. doi: 10.1177/0038038507082314
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507082314 [Google Scholar]
  49. Reay, D. , Crozier, G. , James, D. , Hollingworth, S. , Williams, K. , Jamieson, F. & Beedell, P.
    2008 Re-invigorating democracy? White middle class identities and comprehensive schooling. The Sociological Review56 (2): 238–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑954X.2008.00786.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.00786.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Silverstein, M.
    1993 Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, J. A. Lucy (ed.), 33–58. Cambridge: CUP.
  51. Skeggs, B.
    2004Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Talmy, S.
    2009 Forever FOB? Resisting and reproducing the other in High School ESL. InBeyond Yellow English: Toward a Linguistic Anthropology of Asian Pacific America, A. Reyes & A. Lo (eds), 347–365. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327359.003.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327359.003.0021 [Google Scholar]
  53. Van Lancker, I.
    2016 The reflexive imperative among high-achieving adolescents: A Flemish case study. AILA Review29 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Article Commentary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error