1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Asian Languages and Linguistics
  4. Volume 1, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2665-9336
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9344
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper argues that compounding, the major source of word-formation in Chinese, and the root-and-pattern system in Hebrew involve fundamentally the same syntactic operations and observe the same locality constraints, despite the salient differences. More specifically, it addresses the well-known continuum that the coordinate and attributive compounds behave more like words, whereas resultative and subordinate compounds are much more like phrases. It puts forward the idea that this continuum can be accounted for by assuming that there is a distinction between word-formation from roots and word-formation from words, with the former giving rise to more lexical properties and the latter more phrasal properties. The paper also discusses some related issues, such as the correct formulation of word-level phases and the structure of the major types of compound words in Chinese.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/alal.00003.che
2020-03-11
2024-12-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/alal.00003.che
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Y. A. & Robert, M. W. D.
    (2006) Grammars in Contact – A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexiadou, A. & Terje, L.
    (2017) The structural configurations of root categorization. InL. Bauke & A. Blümel (Eds.), Labels and Roots: 203–232. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501502118‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501502118-009 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arad, M.
    (2003) Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: the case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory21: 737–778. 10.1023/A:1025533719905
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025533719905 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2005) Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morphosyntax. Dordrecht: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, M.
    (1989) Object sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry20: 513–553.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bisetto, A. & Sergio, S.
    (2005) The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio, 4 (2): 319–332.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bloomfield, L.
    (1933) Language. New York: Holt.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Borer, H.
    (1984) Parametric Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. 10.1515/9783110808506
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808506 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2013) Taking Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Brice, H.
    (2017) The root and word distinction: an experimental study of Hebrew denominal verbs. Morphology27: 159–177. 10.1007/s11525‑016‑9297‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-016-9297-0 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cao, C.
    (2016) Xiandai Hanyu Pianyi Fuci Tanjiu [On Partially-directed Compound Words in Modern Chinese]. MA Thesis, Shanghai Normal University.
  12. Chao, Y.
    (1968) A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng, G. & Yang, D.
    (2016) Hanyu dongjieshi fuheci de yuxu ji xiangguan wenti [Word order in Chinese VV compounds and related issues]. Zhongguo Yuwen374 (5): 553–567.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheng, G. & Zhou, G.
    (2015) Verb-object compounding in Chinese: A Distributed Morphology approach. Foreign Language Teaching and Research47: 163–175.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Chomsky, N.
    (1993) A minimalist program for linguistic theory. InK. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger: 1-52.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. (1998) Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. Ms: MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. (2001) Derivation by phase. InM. Kenstowicz (Eds.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language (pp.1–52). Cambridge: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. (2004) Beyond explanatory adequacy. InA. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and Beyond (pp.104–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Collins, C.
    (1994) Topics in Ewe Syntax. Ph. D dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  20. (2002) Multiple verb movement in ǂHoan. Linguistic Inquiry33: 1–29. 10.1162/002438902317382161
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902317382161 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dai, X.
    (1992) Chinese Morphology and its Interface with the Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbus: Ohio State University.
  22. De Belder, M.
    (2017) The root and nothing but the root: primary compounds in Dutch. Syntax:1–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Dong, X.
    (2009) Hanyu de jufa yanbian yu cihuihua [Syntactic change and lexicalization in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen332 (5): 399–409.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Duanmu, S.
    (1990) A formal study of syllable, tone, stress and domain in Chinese languages. Ph.D. dissertation. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institution of Technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. (1998) Wordhood in Chinese. InJ. L. Packard (Ed.), New Approaches to Chinese Word Formation: Morphology, Phonology and the Lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese (pp.135–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110809084.135
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809084.135 [Google Scholar]
  26. Embick, D.
    (2004) On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry35: 355–392. 10.1162/0024389041402634
     https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402634 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2010) Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Fan, J.
    (1958) Xing-ming zuhe jian ‘de’ zi de yufa zuoyong [The grammatical function of de in adjective-noun constructions], Zhongguo Yuwen (5): 213–217.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Feng, S.
    (1997) Hanyu de Yunlv, Cifa yu Jufa [Prosody, Morphology and Syntax of Chinese]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Harley, H.
    (2009) The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. InA. Giannakidou & M. Rathert (Eds.), Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization (pp.320–342). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. (2012) Lexical decomposition in modern generative grammar. InM. Werning, W. Hinzen & E. Machery (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality (pp.328–350). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C.
    (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang, C-T. J.
    (1984) Phrase structure, lexical integrity, and Chinese compounds. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association19 (2): 53–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang, C.-T. J.
    (2006) Resultatives and unaccusatives: a parametric view. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan253: 1–43. 10.7131/chuugokugogaku.2006.1
     https://doi.org/10.7131/chuugokugogaku.2006.1 [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, H.
    (2016) Exploration of Syntax-Phonology Interface in Chinese: Perspectives from Phase Theory and Distributed Morphology. Ph.D. dissertation. Luoyang: PLA University of Foreign Languages.
  36. Li, Y.
    (1990) On V-V compounds in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory8: 177–207. 10.1007/BF00208523
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208523 [Google Scholar]
  37. (1995) The thematic hierarchy and causativity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory13: 255–282. 10.1007/BF00992783
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992783 [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, J.
    (2012) Jiyu yuliaoku de dongbin fuheci shuxing kaocha jiqi cihuihua chengdu fenxi [A corpus-based study of the properties of VO compounds and their lexicalization]. Xiandai Yuwen (10): 42–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lopez, L.
    (2015) Parallel computation in word-formation. Linguistic Inquiry46 (4): 657–701. 10.1162/LING_a_00197
     https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00197 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lu, Z.
    (1957) Hanyu de Goucifa [Chinese Morphology]. Beijing: Kexue Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Marantz, A.
    (2001) Words. Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge: MIT.
  42. (2008) Phases and words. InS.-H. Choe (Ed.), Phases in the Theory of Grammar (pp.191–222). Seoul: Dong In Publisher.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Packard, J. L.
    (2000) The Morphology of Chinese: A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486821
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486821 [Google Scholar]
  44. Rubin, A. D.
    (2010) A Brief Introduction to the Semitic Languages. New Jersey: Gorgias Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Shiao, W.
    (2015) Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin. InW. S.-Y. Wang & C. Sun (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics (pp.306–321). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Simpson, A.
    (2001) Definiteness agreement and the Chinese DP. Language and Linguistics2: 125–156.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Thompson, S.
    (1973) Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin Chinese: A case for lexical rules. Language49: 361–379. 10.2307/412459
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412459 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tsai, W-T. D.
    (2003) Three types of existential quantification in Chinese. InA. Li & A. Simpson (Eds.), Form, Interpretation and Functional Structure: Perspectives from Asian Languages. London: Curzon/Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. William, A.
    (2008) Word order in resultatives. InC. Chang & H. Haynie (Eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 26. Berkeley: University of California.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Xiong, Z.
    (2005) Yi “de” wei hexin de DP jiegou [A DP structure headed by de]. Dangdai Yuyanxue7(2): 148–165.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. (2015) Yinghan Zhishi Jufa Lunyuan Jiegou de Duibi Yanjiu [A Contrastive Study of Argument Structures in Causative Construction in English and Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Languages Education Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang, X.
    (2003) Yusu Lun [On Morphemes]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, N.
    (2007) Root merger in Chinese compounds. Studia Linguistica61(2): 170–184. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2007.00131.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2007.00131.x [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhou, G. & Cheng, G.
    (2018) How are VN compounds in Chinese derived?Dangdai Yuyanxue20 (1): 61–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhou, J.
    (2005) Hanyu Cihui Jiegou Lun [On the Structure of Chinese Words]. Shanghai: Shanghai Cishu Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhou, Y.
    (2015) A Research of the Subject-Predicate Compounds Words in Contemporary Chinese. MA Thesis. Jinan: Shandong University.
/content/journals/10.1075/alal.00003.che
Loading
A root-and-pattern approach to word-formation in Chinese
Asian Languages and Linguistics 1, 71 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.00003.che
/content/journals/10.1075/alal.00003.che
/content/journals/10.1075/alal.00003.che
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chinese; compounding; Distributed Morphology; root; root-and-pattern

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error