The role of cognitive schemas in linguistic convergence

References

1. Bandyopadhyay, Swapon Kumar
   (1989) A Tangsa wordlist. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area12(2): 79–91.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bendix, Edward H.
   (1974) Indo-Aryan and Tibeto-Burman contact. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics3(1): 42–59.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Benedict, Paul K.
   (1972) Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753541
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753541 [Google Scholar]
4. Bhattacharjya, Dwijen
   (2001) The genesis and development of Nagamese: Its social history and linguistic structure. Unpublished PhD dissertation, City University of New York.
5. Bigge, H.
   (1969) Reprint. Dispatch from Lieutenant H. Bigge, Assistant Agent, detached to the Naga Hills, to Captain Jenkins, Agent Governor-General, N.E. Frontier, communicated from the Political Secretariat of India to the Secretary to the Asiatic Society. InThe Nagas in the Nineteenth Century, Verrier Elwin (ed.), 227–232. Oxford University Press. Original publication in Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 1841, VolX1, Pt, 11: 129–136.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boruah, Bhimkanto
   (1993) Nagamese, the language of Nagaland. Mittal Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bradley, David
   1980 Phonological convergence between languages in contact: Mon-Khmer structural borrowing in Burmese. InProceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 259–267.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Burling, Robbins
   (1983) The Sal languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area7(2): 1–32.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Burling, Robbins and L. Amon Phom
   (1998) Phom phonology and word list. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area21(2): 13–42.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Burling, Robbins and Mankai Wangsu
    (1998) Wancho phonology and word list. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area21(2): 43–71.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chakravorty, Birendra Chandra
    (1964) British relations with the hill tribes of Assam. Firma K.L. Mukhopadhyay.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chao, Yuen Ren
    (1959) How Chinese logic operates. Anthropological Linguistics1(1): 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chelliah, Shobhana and Gwen Hyslop
    (2011–2012) Special issue on optional ergative marking in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman AreaVols.34.2 and 35.11.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Clark, Thomas Welborne
    . Reprint (1989) Introduction to Nepali. Ratna Pustak Bhandar. Original publication in 1963, Heffer.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Coupe, Alexander R.
    (2022) Language contact and linguistic diversity in Nagaland. InYanthan Yanbeni and Hewasa Lorin (eds.) Critical conversations in Naga society, 9–32. Heritage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Coupe, Alexander R.
    (2018) Grammaticalization processes in South Asian languages. InNarrog, Heiko and Bernd Heine (eds). Grammaticalization from a typological perspective, 189–218. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198795841.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795841.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
17. Coupe, Alexander R.
    (2017) Mongsen Ao. InThurgood, Graham and Randy J. LaPolla (eds.) The Sino-Tibetan languages2nd edn., 277–301. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Coupe, Alexander R.
    (2011) On core case marking patterns in two Tibeto-Burman languages of Nagaland. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area34.21: 21–47.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Coupe, Alexander R.
    (2007a) A grammar of Mongsen Ao. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198522
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198522 [Google Scholar]
20. Coupe, Alexander R.
    (2007b) Converging patterns of clause linkage in Nagaland. InMiestamo, Matti and Wälchli, Bernhard (eds), New challenges in typology: Broadening the horizons and redefining the foundations. Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs1891, 339–361. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198904.6.339
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198904.6.339 [Google Scholar]
21. Coupe, Alexander R. and Kratochvíl, František
    (2020) Asia before English. InBolton, Kingsley, Werner Botha and Andy Kirkpatrick (eds.) Handbook of Asian Englishes, 15–48. Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118791882.ch2
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118791882.ch2 [Google Scholar]
22. Coupe, Alexander R. and S. A. M. Lestrade
    (2017) Non-structural case marking in Tibeto-Burman and artificial languages. Linguistic Discovery15.11: 1–34. 10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.475
    https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.475 [Google Scholar]
23. Fürer Haimendorf, Christoph von
    (1939) The naked Nagas. Methuen and Co. Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva
    (2005) Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614132
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614132 [Google Scholar]
25. Hutton, James Henry
    (1921a) The Angami Nagas. Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hutton, James Henry
    (1921b) The Sema Nagas. Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hyslop, Gwendolyn
    (2010) Kurtöp case: The pragmatic ergative and beyond. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area33.11: 1–40.
    [Google Scholar]
28. King, C. D.
    (1880) India: Mission to the Assamese. InThe Baptist missionary magazine, Vol.LX, No.4, 100–102. Franklin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. LaPolla, Randy J.
    (2009) Causes and effects of substratum, superstratum and adstratum influence, with reference to Tibeto-Burman languages. Senri Ethnological Studies751: 227–237.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Marrison, Geoffrey Edward
    (1967) The classification of the Naga languages of north-east India. Vol.I1 (Texts) and Vol.II1 (Appendices). Unpublished PhD dissertation, SOAS, University of London.
31. McGregor, William A.
    (2010) Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective. Lingua120(7):1610–1636. 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.010 [Google Scholar]
32. Mills, James Phillip
    (1926) The Ao Nagas. Macmillan and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Robbeets, Martine and Herbert Cuykens
    (2013) Towards a typology of shared grammaticalization. InRobbeets and Cuykens (eds.) Shared grammaticalization, with special focus on the Transeurasian languages. John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.132.05rob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.132.05rob [Google Scholar]
34. Sapir, Edward
    (1921) Language: An introduction to the study of speech. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Scott, James C.
    (2009) The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sreedhar, M. V.
    (1974) Naga Pidgin: A sociolinguistic study of interlingual communication pattern in Nagaland. Central Institute of Indian Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sreedhar, M. V.
    (1985) Standardized grammar of Naga Pidgin. Central Institute of Indian Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Teo, Amos
    (2012) Sumi agentive and topic markers: no and ye. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area35.11: 49–74.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Thomason, Sarah and Terence Kaufman
    (1988) Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520912793
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912793 [Google Scholar]
40. Vansittart, Eden
    (1906) Gurkhas: Handbooks for the Indian Army. Office of the Superintendent, Government Printing, India.
    [Google Scholar]