1887
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2665-9336
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9344
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Syntax Phonology Interface: Argumentation from Tone Sandhi in Chinese Dialects

 
97811389348189781317389019

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/alal.21009.guo
2022-01-27
2022-05-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chen, M.
    (1985) The Syntax of Xiamen Tone Sandhi. MS. UCSD.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (1987) The Syntax of Xiamen Tone Sandhi, Phonology Yearbook, vol.4: 109–150. 10.1017/S0952675700000798
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000798 [Google Scholar]
  3. (1992) Argument vs. Adjunct: Xiamen Tone Sandhi Revisited. MS. UCSD.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chung, R. F.
    (1987) Aspects of Ke-jia Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
  5. Duanmu, S.
    (1992) End-Based Theory, Cyclic Stress, and Tonal Domains, Chicago Linguistics Society, vol.28.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Feng, S. L.
    (2005) Studies on Chinese Prosodic Grammar. Beijing: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaisse, E. M.
    (1985) Connected Speech: The Interaction of Syntax and Phonology. New York & San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Selkirk, E.
    (1986) On Derived Domain in Sentence Phonology, Phonology Yearbook, vol.3: 371–405. 10.1017/S0952675700000695
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000695 [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, H.-M.
    (2017) Syntax-Phonology Interface Argumentation from Tone Sandhi in Chinese Dialects. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/alal.21009.guo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/alal.21009.guo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error