1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2665-9336
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9344
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Korean and Japanese are typical classifier languages that classify a noun based on the semantic type of its referent with a counter word when plurality is involved. Their plural marking appears to be optional when the noun denotes general plurality, but obligatory when a noun is marked by the semantic feature, [+specific] (Ioni, Ko & Wexler, 2004). In this study, we characterize the so-called ‘optional’ plurality in Korean and Japanese as the manifestation of the grammaticalization. Drawing on actual data, we demonstrate that the plural suffix is increasingly used as a neutral plural marker. The grammaticalization is more prevalent when the nouns are higher in the Animacy Hierarchy (e.g., Comrie, 1989), although there are differences in acceptability between Korean and Japanese. We attribute the differences to the language-specific uses of the plural suffix, namely, Japanese associative reading and Korean event-plural reading (Song, 1997).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/alal.22001.lee
2023-07-06
2024-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. An, Young-Ran
    (2008) Korean tul and English all. InCedric Boecks and S. Ulutas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL4). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 55. MITWPL.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cho, Sungdai, & Whitman, John
    (2020) Korean: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Comrie, Bernard
    (1989) Language universals and linguistic typology. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Corbett, Greville G.
    (2000) Number. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164344
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164344 [Google Scholar]
  5. Croft, William
    (2003) Typology and Universals. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Downing, Pamela A.
    (1996) Numeral Classifier Systems: The case of Japanese. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.4 [Google Scholar]
  7. Francis-Ratte, Alexander
    (2021) On the etymology of the Japanese plural suffix and its possible connection to Korean. Asian languages and linguistics2–11, 24–35. 10.1075/alal.21005.fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.21005.fra [Google Scholar]
  8. Greenberg, Joseph
    (1972) Numeral classifiers and substantial number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers of Language Universals, 91, 1–39. Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hudson, Grover
    (2008) Essential introductory linguistics. Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ioni, Tania, Ko, Heejeong, & Wexler, Kenneth
    (2004) Article semantics in L2 acquisition: the role of specificity. Language acquisition, 12(1), 3–69. 10.1207/s15327817la1201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Kang, Beom-mo
    (2007) Plurality and plural marker ‘deul’. Linguistics, 471. 3–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kim, Cheon-taek
    (1728) Cheonggu Yeongon [Songs of Green Hills].
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim, Dong-In
    (1934) “On Yi Kwang-su.” Samch’ŏlli. December.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim, Jaeshil
    (2011) “A micro-parametric approach to plural marking in classified languages.” (paper presented at the56th annual conference of the international linguistic association. Rutgers University. April 15, 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim, Kyumin, & Melchin, Paul B.
    (2018) On the complementary distribution of plurals and classifiers in East Asian classifier languages. Lang Linguist Compass, 121: e12271. 10.1111/lnc3.12271
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12271 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, Young-Wha
    (2009) The syntax of the Korean plural marker ‑tul and classifiers in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 341, 829–852. 10.18855/lisoko.2009.34.4.003
    https://doi.org/10.18855/lisoko.2009.34.4.003 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ko, Young Geun
    (1991) P’yocwun Cwungseskwuemunpeplon. [Standard Middle Korean Grammar] Top Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kurafuji, Takeo
    (2004) Plural morphemes, definiteness, and the notion of semantic parameter. Language and linguistics5(1), 211–242.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kwak, Eun Joo
    (1996) The event dependency of noun phrases. Ph.D. Thesis. Brown University.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
    (1976) [1965] The evolution of grammatical categories. Reprinted in Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. Esquisses linguistiques. Volume21, 38–54. Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee, Eunhee, Madigan, Sean, & Park, Mee-Jeong
    (2016) An introduction to Korean linguistics. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee, K-Moon, & Ramsey, Robert
    (2011) A history of the Korean language. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511974045
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974045 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee, Kiri, Yu Cho, Young-mee, & Park, Min-Young
    (2018) Unmarked plurality and specificity in Korean and Japanese plural nouns: A preliminary study. InDavid G. Hebert (Ed.), International perspectives on translation, education, and innovation in Japanese and Korean societies (pp.121–132). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑68434‑5_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68434-5_8 [Google Scholar]
  24. Levy, Indra
    (2006) Sirens of the western shore. Columbia University Press. 10.7312/levy13786
    https://doi.org/10.7312/levy13786 [Google Scholar]
  25. Murahata, Goro, & Murahata, Yoshiko
    (2021) Linguistic multi-competence in the community: the case of a Japanese plural suffix ‑tachi for individuation. Applied linguistics review, 1–15. 10.1515/applirev‑2020‑0099
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0099 [Google Scholar]
  26. Nakanishi, Kimiko, & Tomioka, Satoshi
    (2004) Japanese plurals are exceptions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics131, 113–140. 10.1023/B:JEAL.0000019058.46668.c1
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEAL.0000019058.46668.c1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Narrog, Heiko, & Heine, Bernd
    (2021) Grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nihon Kokugo Daijiten [Dictionary of Japanese national language] https://www.weblio.jp/content/%E3%81%9F%E3%81%A1#NKKSS (accessed on29 November 2021).
  29. Noh, Eunjoo
    (2008) A study on the meaning of Korean 0-marked and ‘tul’-marked nouns. Discourse and cognition, 15.11, 43–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Song, Jae Jung
    (1997) The so-called plural copy in Korean as a marker of distribution and focus. Journal of pragmatics, 271, 203–224. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00042‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00042-2 [Google Scholar]
  32. Tomioka, Satoshi
    (2021) Japanese -tachi and generalized associative plurals. InPatricia Cabredo Hofherr & Jenny Doetjes (Eds.), The Handbook of Grammatical Number (pp.1–15). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198795858.013.22
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198795858.013.22 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/alal.22001.lee
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/alal.22001.lee
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): classifier languages; grammaticalization; Japanese; Korean; plurality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error