1887
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2665-9336
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9344
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

While the domain of toponymy has great research potential, it has so far gained little attention in Iran. The present paper is a typological study on a sample group of toponyms from two different provinces of Gilan (a northern coastal province next to the Caspian Sea) and Bushehr (a southern coastal province beside the Persian Gulf) within the framework of the Australian National Placenames Survey typology proposed by Tent and Blair. The two regions in question are similar in terms of adjacency to a major water body but different in language, culture, and geography. To determine whether the Australian proposed typology is applicable to Iranian toponyms, we collected 60 coastal placenames from Gilan and Bushehr and classified them according to their Specifics and Generics based on Tent and Blair’s (20092011) typology. Further, we compared placenaming motivations and processes in the two regions. The results show that although the Iranian placenames differ from the Australian ones in terms of their structure, they fit well into the typology. Water-related features are among the top motivations for local namers in both Gilan and Bushehr. Nevertheless, Bushehr namers are more motivated by natural features while those from Gilan, in most cases, are non-naturally motivated.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/alal.22002.pos
2022-07-05
2022-08-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albuquerque, Davi, Talebi-Dastenaei, Mahnaz, & Poshtvan, Hamideh
    (2018) Toponyms in ecolinguistics. Contrasts in Different Strategies of Naming Places in Iran and Brazil. Revista de Letras, 37, 148–161.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bazin, Marcel
    (2012) Gīlān I. Geography and Ethnography. InE. Yarshater (Ed), Encyclopædia Iranica5 (6) (pp.617–625). New York: Center for Iranian studies, Columbia University, https://iranicaonline.org/articles/gilan-i-geography
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blair, David, & Tent, Jan
    (2015) Feature terms for Australian toponymy. ANPS technical paper. Australian National Placenames Survey, 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dadras, Hasan, & Koochakizadeh, Faramarz
    (2014) Naming and Apellation of Gilan’s Settlements. Blour publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hakala, Ulla, Sjöblom, Paula, Kantola, Satu-Paivi
    (2015) Toponyms as carriers of heritage: implications for place branding. Journal of Product, & Management, Brand. 24(3), 263–275. 10.1108/JPBM‑05‑2014‑0612
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-05-2014-0612 [Google Scholar]
  6. ISC (Iran Statistics Center)
    ISC (Iran Statistics Center) (2018) Public Census of Population and Settlement 2016. Tehran: Ministry of the Interior, Iran Statistics Center. Available at: https://www.amar.org.ir
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lauder, Multamia
    (2013) The role of place names in preserving cultural heritage in Indonesia. Paper, Place Names Preserving Cultural Heritage, Brunei, 13–14, 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lecoq, Pierre
    (1989) Le dialectes du centre de l’Iran. InR. Schmitt (Ed.), Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum (pp.313–326). Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nash, Joshua
    (2013) Insular Toponymies: Place-naming on Norfolk Island, South Pacific and Dudley Peninsula, Kangaroo Island (Vol.9). John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/clu.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clu.9 [Google Scholar]
  10. Nemati, Fatemeh., Ghasemi, Shakiba., & Anonby, Erik
    (2017) Bushehr Province language distribution data. InE. Anonby & M. e. a. Taheri-Ardali (Eds.), Atlas of the Languages of Iran (ALI). Ottawa: Geomatics and Cartographic Research Centre, Carleton University. Available at: iranatlas.net
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Poshtvan, Hamideh., Anonby, Erik
    . (under publication). Gilān Province language distribution data. In: Atlas of the languages of Iran, byErik Anonby, Mortaza Taheri-Ardali, Ottawa: GCRC (Geomatics and Cartographic Research Centre), Carleton University.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Stilo, Donald
    (2018) The Caspian region and south Azerbaijan: Caspian and Tatic. The Languages and Linguistics of Western Asia, An areal perspective. De Gruyter Mouton, 659–824.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tent, Jan
    (2015) Approaches to research in toponymy. Names, 63(2), 65–74. 10.1179/0027773814Z.000000000103
    https://doi.org/10.1179/0027773814Z.000000000103 [Google Scholar]
  14. Tent, Jan., & Blair, David
    (2009) Motivations for naming: A toponymic typology. ANPS Technical paper, South Turramurra, NSW: Australian National Placenames Survey, 2. https://www.anps.org.au/upload/ANPSTechPaper2.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2011) Motivations for naming: The development of a toponymic typology for Australian placenames. Names, 59(2), 67–89. 10.1179/002777311X12976826704000
    https://doi.org/10.1179/002777311X12976826704000 [Google Scholar]
  16. Tent, Jan., & Slatyer, Helen
    (2009) Naming places on the ‘Southland’: European place-naming practices from 1606 to 1803. Australian Historical Studies, 40(1), 5–31. 10.1080/10314610802662995
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10314610802662995 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/alal.22002.pos
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/alal.22002.pos
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bushehr; Gilan; Iran; mechanisms; motivations; toponymy; typology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error