1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2665-9336
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9344
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

I argue that gapping in Mandarin Chinese as a deletion operation (cf. Wei 2011Ai 2014) is administrated by some semantic constraints and the discourse in which they occur, in line with Kuno (1976)Tsao (1979) and Wei (2011). Specifically, I argue that the semantic combination of the VP (cf. Paul 1996ab1999) and the object NP (cf. Li 1998) in gapped sentences cannot be [−generic, -definite]. That is, the VP in the gapped clause cannot have a [-generic] interpretation and simultaneously for the object to have a [−definite] interpretation. If so combined, gapping in Mandarin Chinese will be blocked.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/alal.22013.ai
2023-07-06
2024-06-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ai, Ruixi Ressy
    (2001) Tonology in Mandarin: towards an OT perspective. Ms. University of California, Irvine.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (2003) Eventuality in terms of richer and more rigid light verb syntax: some evidence from Chinese. InAygen, G., Bowern, C. and Quinn, C. (Eds.) Harvard working papers in linguistics: papers from the GSAS/Dudley House workshop on light verbs: November 11th, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2014) Topic-comment structure, focus movement and gapping formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 451, 125–145. 10.1162/LING_a_00150
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00150 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng, L. L. and R. Sybesma
    (1999) Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 301, 509–542. 10.1162/002438999554192
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192 [Google Scholar]
  5. Fu, Yu
    (2012) Does gapping exist in Modern Chinese?Journal of Foreign Languages, 51, 24–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hankamer, Jorge
    (1973) Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry, 51, 17–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jackendoff, Ray
    (1971) Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 21–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2002) Foundations of language. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2010) Meaning and the lexicon. The parallel architecture 1975–2010. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnson, Kyle
    (1994) Bridging the gaps. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2004) In search of the English middle field. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2009) Gapping is not (VP-) ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 401, 289–328. 10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.289
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.289 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kuno, Susumu
    (1976) Gapping: a functional analysis. Linguistic Inquiry, 71, 300–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Langendoen, D. Terence
    (1974) Acceptable conclusions from unacceptable ambiguity. Presented at theconference Testing Linguistic Hypotheses, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, May 10–11, 1974.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Leben, William R.
    (1973) Suprasegmental phonology. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.
  16. (1978) The representation of tone. InVictoria A. Fromkin (ed.) Tone: a linguistic survey (pp.177–219). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑267350‑4.50011‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-267350-4.50011-X [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, Mei-Du
    (1988) Anaphoric structures of Chinese. Student Book Co, Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, Yen-hui Audrey
    (1998) Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry, 291, 693–702. 10.1162/ling.1998.29.4.693
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.1998.29.4.693 [Google Scholar]
  19. McCarthy, John
    (1986) OCP effects: gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry, 171, 207–264.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1995) Extensions of faithfulness: Rotuman revisited. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McCarthy, John and Alan Prince
    (1993a) Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Rutgers University. RuCCS-TR-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1993b) Generalized alignment. InGeert Booij & Jaap van Marle (Eds.) Yearbook of morphology (pp.79–153). Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1994) The emergence of the unmarked: optimality in prosodic morphology. InMerce Gonzalez (ed.) Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society241 (pp.333–379). Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1995) Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Rutgers University.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Neijt, Anneke
    (1979) Gapping: A contribution to sentence grammar. Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ozturk, Balkiz
    (2004) Case, referentiality and phrase structure. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
  27. Paul, Waltraud
    (1996a) Verb raising in Chinese. InChin-chuan Cheng (Eds.) Proceedings of the eighth North America Conference on Chinese Linguistics11 (pp.260–276). Graduate Students in Linguistics, USC.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1996b) Verb raising in Mandarin Chinese. Studies in Linguistic Sciences, 261, 255–270.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1999) Verb gapping in Chinese: a case of verb raising. Lingua, 1071, 207–226. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(98)00040‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00040-0 [Google Scholar]
  30. Prince, Alan. and Paul Smolensky
    (1991/1993) Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms. Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Boulder.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Pulleyblank, Douglas
    (1994) Vowel harmony and optimality theory. Proceedings of the workshop on phonology, University of Coimbra, September 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pulleyblank, Douglas and William J. Turkel
    (1995) Optimality theory and learning algorithms: the representation of recurrent featural asymmetries. InJ. Durand and B. Laks (eds.) Current trends in phonology: models and methods. CNRS, Paris-X and University of Salford. University of Salford Publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Richards, Norvin
    (2002) Lecture handouts distributed in MIT Syntax Seminar, Spring 2002: Topics in the syntax-phonology interface.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2016) Contiguity theory. The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rizzi, Luigi
    (1990) Relativized minimality. The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ross, John
    (1972) Doubl-ing. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 61–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sag, Ivan
    (1976) Deletion and logical form. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  38. Soh, Hooi Ling
    (1998) Object scrambling in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  39. Stillings, Justine T.
    (1975) The formulation of gapping in English as evidence for variable types in syntactic transformations. Linguistic Analysis, 11, 247–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Tai, James H.
    (1969) Coordination reduction. Doctoral dissertation. Indiana University.
  41. Tang, Sze-Wing
    (1998) Parametrization of features in Syntax (Chapter 3). Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Irvine.
  42. (2001) The (non-) existence of gapping in Chinese and its implications for the theory of gapping. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 101, 201–224. 10.1023/A:1011250802691
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011250802691 [Google Scholar]
  43. Tsai, Wei-Tien
    (1994) On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  44. Tsao, Feng-Fu
    (1979) A functional study of topic in Chinese: the first step towards discourse analysis. Student Book, Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. van Oirsouw, Robert
    (1987) The syntax of coordination. Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wei, Ting-Chi
    (2011) Subordinate gaps in Mandarin Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 91, 51–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Weisser, Philipp
    (2015) Derived coordination. Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110443578
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110443578 [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu, H.-H. Iris
    (2002) Gapping in classical and modern Chinese. Ms. National Tsing-Hua University.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2003) On ellipsis and gapping in Mandarin Chinese. MA. thesis. National Tsing-Hua University.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/alal.22013.ai
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ATB-movement; definiteness; deletion; empty verb sentence; gapping; genericity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error