1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2665-9336
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9344
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study illustrates that for the Chinese bare form reflexive ‘self’, feature conflicts can cause both the local binding blocking effect and the long-distance binding blocking effect. To make long-distance binding possible, a feature-matching requirement between the long-distance antecedent and the reindexed local reflexive must be met, as proposed by Tang (1989). In addition to this, a feature-matching requirement between the verb and its subject and object must also be satisfied, with the latter likely having a suppressive effect on the former. Further research is needed to understand the interaction of these two feature-matching requirements and what constraints exist. Furthermore, the blocking effect can be triggered by a variety of factors, including syntax, feature agreement, pragmatics, discourse prominence, animacy and thematic conditions and other combined effects. ’s odd performance might be the result of their joint efforts. We need to further clarify how these factors work together.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/alal.22015.li
2023-07-06
2024-06-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chomsky, Noam
    (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Foris Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cole, Peter., & Wang, Chengchi
    (1996) Antecedents and blockers of long-distance reflexives: The case of Chinese ziji. Linguistic Inquiry, 27(3), 357–390.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu, Jianhua
    (2019) Prominence and locality in grammar: The syntax and semantics of wh-questions and reflexives (1st ed., Vol.11). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429273209
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429273209 [Google Scholar]
  4. Hu, Jianhua., & Pan, Haihua
    (2002) NP显著性的计算与汉语反身代词“自己”的指称NP [Prominence and the Chinese reflexive ziji]. Dang Dai Yu Yan Xue当代语言学, 4(1), 46–60. 10.3969/j.issn.1007‑8274.2002.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-8274.2002.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  5. Huang, C.-T. James
    (1984) On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(4), 531–574.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang, C.-T. James., & Liu, C.-S. Luther
    (2001) Logophoricity, attitudes, and ziji at the interface. InCole, Peter., Hermon, Gabriella., & Huang, C.-T. James. (Eds.), Long distance reflexives, Syntax and Semantics 33 (pp.141–195). Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang, C.-T. James., & Tang, C.-C. Jane
    (1991) The local nature of the long-distance reflexive in Chinese. InKoster, Jan., & Reuland, Eric. (Eds.), Long-Distance Anaphora (pp.263–282). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627835.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627835.014 [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang, C.-T. James., & Li, Yen-hui. Audrey., & Li, Yafei
    (2009) The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166935
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166935 [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang, Yan
    (1994) The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: A study with special reference to Chinese. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554292
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554292 [Google Scholar]
  10. Jin, Zhonghao
    (2003a) 略谈动词对 “自己”长距离约束的制约作用 [Verb restraint function to long distance binding of ziji]. Han Yu Xue Xi汉语学习41, 9–12. CitetononCRdoi:10.3969/j.issn.1003‑7365.2003.04.002
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7365.2003.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2003b) 现代汉语中“自己”位于主宾语位置上的照应关系研究 [A study on the anaphoric relation of ziji as subjects or objects in modern Chinese]. Doctoral dissertation, Peking University.
  12. Kuno, Susumu
    (1972) Pronominalization, reflexivization, and direct discourse. Linguistic Inquiry, 3(2), 161–195.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (1987) Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pan, Haihua
    (1997) Constraints on Reflexivization in Mandarin Chinese. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315052274
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315052274 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2001) Why the blocking effect?InCole, Peter., & Hermon, Gabriella., & Huang, C.-T. James. (Eds.), Long-distance reflexives, Syntax and Semantics 33 (pp.279–316). Academic Press. 10.1163/9781849508742_010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9781849508742_010 [Google Scholar]
  16. Sells, Peter
    (1987) Aspects of Logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(3), 445–479.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tang, C.-C. Jane
    (1989) Chinese reflexives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7(1), 93–121. 10.1007/BF00141348
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141348 [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, Yingying., & Pan, Haihua
    (2014) A note on the non-de se interpretation of attitude reports. Language (Baltimore), 90(3), 746–754. 10.1353/lan.2014.0057
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0057 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2015) Empathy and Chinese long distance reflexive ziji – remarks on Giorgi (2006, 2007). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33(1), 307–322. 10.1007/s11049‑014‑9257‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9257-5 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2021) Chinese Reflexives. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. (pp.1–38). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.887
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.887 [Google Scholar]
  21. Xu, Liejiong
    (1993) The long distance binding of ziji. Journal of Chines Linguistics, 21(1), 123–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1994) The antecedent of ziji. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 22(1), 115–137.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/alal.22015.li
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/alal.22015.li
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error