1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2665-9336
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9344
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Old Eastern Indo-Aryan stage/OEIA (900–1100 AD approx) showed split ergativity with evidence from its sole source . New Eastern Indo-Aryan/EIA languages have lost their ergative properties (Stump, 1983; Bubenik, 1989, among others) gradually, evolving as nominative-accusative languages in the present time. The current study highlights how the Voice head in the structure is responsible for the evolution of the case system in the EIA languages. As the Voice head is intricately related to the external theta role and ergative case (Legate, 2014), it is essential to note its characteristics in the diachrony of EIA languages. This paper proposes that OEIA ergativity, seen in , is DP-ergative, following the diagnostics of Polinsky (2016), where the Voice head assigns structural ergative to subject DP. It entails that OEIA has a distinct Voice head in its spine, which assigns the structural ergative case to the DP. The diagnostics used are agreement, A-movement, A′ movement, Binding, and coordinate structures. However, such split ergativity is not seen in the present EIA languages. This entails that the Voice head is lost. This loss led to the rise of a TP-determined structure for all tenses, leading to the emergence of the nominative alignment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/alal.24014.ban
2025-02-06
2026-07-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aldridge, Edith
    (2004) Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  2. (2008) Generative approaches to ergativity. Language and Linguistic Compass: Syntax and Morphology, 2(5), 966–995. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00075.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00075.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Authier, Gilles., & Haude, Katharina
    (Eds.) (2012) Ergativity, valency and voice. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110227734
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110227734 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bubenik, Vit
    (1989) On the Origins and Elimination of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan Languages. Canadian Journal of Languages/Reveu Canadienne de Linguistique, 34(4), 377–398. 10.1017/S0008413100024294
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100024294 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chatterji, Suniti. K.
    (1926) Origin and Development of Bengali. Calcutta University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chomsky, Noam
    (1995) The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coon, Jessica
    (2017) Two types of ergative agreement: Implications for Case. A pesky set: Papers for David Pesetsky, 361–370.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dahl, Eystein
    (2010) Time, Tense and Aspect in Early Vedic Grammar: Exploring inflectional semantics in the Rigveda (Vol.5). Brill. 10.1163/ej.9789004178144.i‑475
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004178144.i-475 [Google Scholar]
  9. Deo, Ashwini
    (2006) Tense and Aspect in Indo-Aryan languages: variation and Diachrony. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation), Stanford University: Stanford.
  10. Devi, Jayantimala
    (1986) Ergativity: A Historical Analysis in Assamese. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation), University of Delhi: New Delhi.
  11. Dixon, Robert M.
    (1994) Ergativity. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611896
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kakati, Banikanta
    (1941) Assamese- its formation and development. Government of Assam.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Key, Gregory
    (2013) The Morphosyntax of the Turkish causative construction. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation), University of Arizona.
  14. Kratzer, Angelika
    (1996) Severing the external argument from its verb. InJohan Rooryck, & Laurie, Zaring. (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8617‑7_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  15. Legate, Julie. A.
    (2002) Warlpiri: Theoretical implications. (Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation), MIT.
  16. (2014) Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese (Vol.691). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028141.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262028141.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2017) ‘The Locus of Ergative Case’. InJessica Coon, Diane Massam, and Lisa Demena Travis (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Oxford Handbooks. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.6
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.6 [Google Scholar]
  18. MacDonald, Jinnis. E.
    (2006) The syntax of inner aspect. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation), Stony Brook University.
  19. Mayadhar, Mansinha
    (1962) History of Oriya Literature. Sahitya Academi.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. McGinnis, Martha
    (1998) Locality in A-movement. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation), MIT.
  21. (2001) Variation in the phase structure of applicatives. Linguistic Variation Yearbook1 (1): 105–146. 10.1075/livy.1.06mcg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.1.06mcg [Google Scholar]
  22. Mishra, Pranab. K.
    (1997) Comprehensive History and Culture of Orissa Volume 1. Kaveri Books, New Delhi
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Montaut, Anne
    (2006) The evolution of the tense-aspect system in Hindi/Urdu. Proceedings of LFG Conference 2006 (p. prépublication). CSLI publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (2016) Why ergative case marker in modal clauses? The historical evolution of aspect, modality, ergative and locative in Indo-Aryan. InEystein Dahl & Kryzstof Stronski (Eds.) (2016) Ergativity in Indo-Aryan and beyond, 135–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mosel, Ulrike, & Evan Hovdhaugen
    (1992) Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Polinsky, Maria
    (2016) Deconstructing ergativity: Two types of ergative languages and their features. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256586.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256586.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Sen, Sunandan. K.
    (2012) A Comparative Study of Old Bengali and Early Middle Bengali(unpublished). (Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation), University of Calcutta: Calcutta. shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/handle/10603/156545
  28. Singh, Raj. K.
    (2009) Encyclopaedia of Assamese Literature. Anmol Publication. ISBN: 978-8126141418.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stroński, Krzysztof
    (2009) Approaches to Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Lingua Posnaniensis, 51(1). 10.2478/v10122‑009‑0006‑x
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10122-009-0006-x [Google Scholar]
  30. Stump, Gregory. T.
    (1983) The Elimination of Ergative Patterns of Case-Marking and Verbal-Agreement in Modern Indic Languages. Working Papers in Linguistics, 140–164. Ohio State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sundaresan, Sandhya., & Thomas McFadden
    (2017) The articulated v layer: Evidence from Tamil. InD’Alessandro, Roberta, Irene Franco, and Ángel J. Gallego (Eds.), The Verbal Domain, 153–178. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tripaṭhi, Kunjabihari
    (1963) The Evolution of Oriya Language and Script. Utkal University, Cuttack.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/alal.24014.ban
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/alal.24014.ban
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Eastern Indo-Aryan Languages; ergativity; ergativity loss; voice
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error