1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Asian Languages and Linguistics
  4. Volume 6, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2665-9336
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9344
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that the layered affixation of passive and causative morphemes in Mongolian and Japanese mirrors the Split VoiceP structure of passive and causative clauses, where the affixation of a voice suffix signals the introduction of an argument by a voice head spelled out by that suffix. This head-argument correlation, ensuring the morpho-syntax mirroring of voice suffixes, entails that the voice domain comprises separate projections that are split out of VoiceP. Clauses are built by introducing arguments as potential subjects (sbjs) through voice heads of the same substance, where a last-introduced sbj is promoted to the nominative position, with others, if any, remaining non-nominative within the voice domain. From this, it follows that Voice is a sbj-introducing, not merely argument-introducing, head, and that the interconnection of passives and causatives as voice constructions lies in the fact that both are derived over the Split VoiceP structure. Consequently, voice constructions can be accounted for in a unified way, without the need of postulating dedicated heads such as Passive and Cause, and the clause building mode is reducible to introduction of arguments as sbjs, which ultimately comes down to Free Merge.

© 2025 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/alal.24023.bai
2026-01-29
2026-02-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/alal.24023.bai
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Florian Schäfer
    (2015) External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: A Layering Approach. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2018) Passive. InNorbert Hornstein, Howard Lasnik, Pritty Patel-Grosz, and Charles Yang (eds.), Syntactic Structures after 60 Years, 403–425. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501506925‑407
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501506925-407 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alsina, Alex
    (1992) On the argument structure of causatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 231, 517–555.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aoyagi, Hiroshi
    (2021) On the causative and passive morphology in Japanese and Korean. Open Linguistics, 2021 (7), 87–110. 10.1515/opli‑2021‑0004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2021-0004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bai, Chigchi
    (2025) Passivization by Voice: A merge-based approach. JELS, 421, 312–320.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bai, Chigchi and Siyang Xia
    (2025) A Simpler Syntax of Middles, Unaccusatives and (Fake) Passives. Talk presented atThe 18th International Spring Forum of English Linguistics (Available athttps://mmiyamaelsj.wordpress.com/2025/05/10/sf18materials/).
  7. Baker, Mark
    (1985) The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry16 (3), 373–415.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bao, Chunmei, Chigchi Bai, and Togtambayar Wu
    (2025) A Unified Account of Passives and Causatives: The Case of Mongolian and Japanese. To appear inMIT Working Papers in Linguistics (Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics).
  9. Bruening, Benjamin
    (2012) By phrases in passives and nominal. Syntax, 161, 1–41. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2012.00171.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2012.00171.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Chomsky, Noam
    (2013) Problems of projection. Lingua, 1301, 33–49. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2015) Problems of projection: Extensions. InElisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann, and Simona Matteini (eds.), Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honor of Adriana Belletti, 3–16. John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.223.01cho
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.01cho [Google Scholar]
  12. Collins, Chris
    (2005) A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax, 81, 81–120. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2005.00076.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00076.x [Google Scholar]
  13. (2024) Principles of Argument Structure: A Merge-Based Approach. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/15436.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/15436.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dixon, R. M. W.
    (2000) A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. InR. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, 30–83. MIT Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.003 [Google Scholar]
  15. Haider, Hubert
    (2024) ONE GRAMMAR IN 7.164 VARIANTS — Confessions of a veteran syntactician. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/008473
  16. Harley, Heidi
    (2008) On the causative construction. InShigeru Miyagawa and Mamoru Saito (eds.), Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 20–53. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195307344.013.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195307344.013.0002 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2013) External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua, 1251, 34–57. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hashimoto, Kunihito
    (2019) The different meanings of causative sentences in Mongolian (in Japanese). Journal of Language and Culture of Hokkaido, 171, 141–188.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoshi, Hiroko
    (1999) Passives. InNatsuko Tsujimura (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 191–235. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Jacobsen, Wesley
    (1992) The Transitive Structure of Events in Japanese. Kurosio.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Janhunen, Juha
    (2012) Mongolian. John Benjamins. 10.1075/loall.19
     https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.19 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kratzer, Angelika
    (1996) Severing the external argument from its verb. InRooryck Johan and Zaring Laurie (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, 109–137. Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8617‑7_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kubo, Miori
    (1992) Japanese passives. InWorking Papers of the Department of Languages and Cultures, 231, 231–302. University of Hokkaido.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kullmann, Rita and Dandi-Ydam, Tserenpil
    (2015) Mongolian Grammar, 5th edition, Kullnom Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuroda, Shigeyuki
    (1993) Lexical and productive causatives in Japanese: An examination of the theory of paradigmatic structure. Journal of Japanese Linguistics, 151, 1–81. 10.1515/jjl‑1993‑0102
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-1993-0102 [Google Scholar]
  26. Legate, Julie Anne
    (2003) Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry, 341, 506–515. 10.1162/ling.2003.34.3.506
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2003.34.3.506 [Google Scholar]
  27. Miyagawa, Shigeru
    (1984) Blocking and Japanese causatives. Lingua, 641, 177–207. 10.1016/0024‑3841(84)90016‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(84)90016-0 [Google Scholar]
  28. (1998) (S)ase as an elsewhere causative and the syntactic nature of words. Journal of Japanese Linguistics161, 67–110. 10.1515/jjl‑1998‑0105
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-1998-0105 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nie, Yining
    (2020) Morphological causatives are Voice over Voice. Word Structure, 131, 102–126. 10.3366/word.2020.0161
     https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2020.0161 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pylkkänen, Liina
    (2008) Introducing Arguments. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Saito, Mamoru
    (1982) Case Marking in Japanese: A Preliminary Study. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    (1976) The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, 1–39. Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368842_002
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368842_002 [Google Scholar]
  33. (1990) The Languages of Japan. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Tsujimura, Natsuko
    (1996) An Introduction to Japanese Linguistics. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Umetani, Hiroyuki
    (2006) Serial use of the passive and causative suffixes in Mongolian. InKato Shigehiro and Yoshida Hiromi (eds.), Gengo Kenkyuu no Shyatei, 83–102. Sanbi Insatu.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Washio, Ryuichi
    (1993) When causatives mean passive: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 21, 45–90. 10.1007/BF01440583
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01440583 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wurmbrand, Susi and Koji Shimamura
    (2017) The features of the voice domain: Actives, passives, and restructuring. InRoberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco and Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The Verbal Domain, 179–204. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/alal.24023.bai
Loading
Mirror principle and split VoiceP
Asian Languages and Linguistics 6, 253 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.24023.bai
/content/journals/10.1075/alal.24023.bai
/content/journals/10.1075/alal.24023.bai
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): causative; Japanese; Mirror Principle; Mongolian; passive; voice

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error