An analysis of Turkish lexical items insan and insanlar as impersonal pronouns

References

1. Abdurusul, Muzappar
   (2019) A brief description on impersonal constructions in Uyghur. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 7(4), 158–165.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahn, Mikyung & Yap, Foong Ha
   (2023) When a third person pronoun means ‘you’: An analysis of Korean tangsin and speaker stance. Journal of Pragmatics, 210(2),157–171.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aksan, Yeşim, Aksan, Mustafa, Mersinli, Ümit & Demirhan, Umut Ufuk
   (2017) A frequency dictionary of Turkish. Core vocabulary for learners. Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alhailawani, Mohammad Ali, Othman, Waleed Ahmad & Abdel-Ghafer, Osama Abdel Rahman
   (2022) On the feature (in)deficiency of dedicated impersonal pronouns: The view from Jordanian Arabic. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 7(1), 1–34.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
   (2004) Impersonal pronouns in Somali, German and French. Paper presented at thesyntax of the world’s languages, Max Planck Institute.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
   (2010) Binding properties of human pronouns in generic and episodic contexts. Paper presented at theworkshop on impersonal human pronouns, CNRS /Université Paris-8.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chierchia, Gennaro
   (1995) Variability of impersonal subjects. InEmmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara H. Partee (Eds.), Quantification in natural languages (pp.107–143). Kluwer.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cinque, Guglielmo
   (1988) On si constructions and the theory of Arb. Linguistic Inquiry, 191, 521–581.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Coussé, Evie & van der Auwera, Johan
   (2012) Human impersonal pronouns in Swedish and Dutch: A contrastive study of man and men. Languages in Contrast, 121, 121–138.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Egerland, Verner
    (2003) Impersonal pronouns in Scandanivian and Romance. Working papers in Scandanivian syntax, 711, 75–102.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Enç, Mürvet
    (1986) Topic switching and pronominal subjects in Turkish. InDan Slobin & Karl Zimmer (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (pp.195–208). John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.8.11enc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.8.11enc [Google Scholar]
12. Enç, Mürvet
    (1991) The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 22(1), 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Erguvanlı, Eser
    (1986) Pronominal versus zero representation of anaphora. InDan Slobin & Karl Zimmer (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (pp.209–231). John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.8.12tay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.8.12tay [Google Scholar]
14. Fenger, Paula
    (2018) How impersonal does one gets? A study of man pronouns in Germanic. The Journal of Germanic Comparative Linguistics, 21(3), 291–325.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gast, Volker & van der Auwera, Johan
    (2013) Towards a distributional typology of human impersonal pronouns based on data from European languages. InDik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (Eds.), Languages across boundaries. Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska (pp.119–158). De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hasanpoor, Jafar
    (1999) A study of European, Persian, and Arabic loans in standard Sorani. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Uppsala University.
    [Google Scholar]
17. von Heusinger, Klaus & Kornfilt, Jaklin
    (2005) The case of the direct object in Turkish: Semantics, syntax and morphology. Turkic Languages, 91, 3–44.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hall, David
    (2018) The impersonal gets personal: A new pronoun in Multicultural London English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 381, 117–150.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kemiksiz, Ömer
    (2022) Foreign-origin words in reading texts in secondary school Turkish textbooks. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 15(1), 407–424.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kitagawa, Chisato & Lehrer, Adrienne
    (1990) Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(5), 739–759.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kornfilt, Jaklin
    (1991) Issues in syntax. InHendrik Boeschoten & Ludo Verhoeven (Eds.), Turkish linguistics today (pp.60–92). E. J. Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kornfilt, Jaklin
    (1997) Turkish. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Krifka, Manfred, Pelletier, Francis J., Carlson, Gregory N., ter Meulen, Alice, Link, Godehard & Chierchia, Gennaro
    (1995) Genericity: An introduction. InGregory N. Carlson & Francis J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp.1–124). University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Laude-Cirtautas, Ilse
    (1978) On necessitative and related forms in the Turkic languages. Central Asiatic Journal, 22(1–2), 44–70.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Malamud, Sophia A.
    (2012) Impersonal indexicals: one, you, man and du. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 15(1), 1–48.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Öztürk, Balkız
    (2001) Turkish as a non-pro-drop language. InEser Erguvanlı Taylan (Ed.), The verb in Turkish (pp.239–259). John Benjamins.10.1075/la.44.10ozt
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.44.10ozt [Google Scholar]
27. Siewierska, Anna
    (2008) Ways of impersonalizing: Pronominal vs. verbal strategies. InMaría de los Ángeles Gómez González, J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Elsa M. González Álvarez (Eds.), Current trends in functional linguistics: Functional and cognitive perspectives (pp.3–26). John Benjamins.10.1075/sfsl.60.03sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.60.03sie [Google Scholar]
28. Siewierska, Anna
    (2011) Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals: ‘Man’ constructions vs. third person plural-impersonals in the languages of Europe. InAndrej L. Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (Eds.), Impersonal constructions: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp.57–90). John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.124.03sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.03sie [Google Scholar]
29. Turan, Ümit Deniz
    (1996) Türkçe’de kişisiz gizli özne ve ‘insan’ [Invisible impersonal subject and ‘insan’ in Turkish]. Dilbilim Araştırmaları, 71, 245–249.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Turgay, Tacettin
    (2023) Generic markers in Turkish. Turkic Languages, 271, 65–89.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Viberg, Åke
    (2010) Swedish impersonal constructions from a crosslinguistic perspective: An exploratory corpus-based study. Orientalia Suecana, LIX1, 122–158.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Yavaş, Feryal
    (1982) The Turkish aorist. Glossa, 16(1), 40–43.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Zobel, Sarah
    (2011) Arguments for a two-operator analysis of impersonal pronouns in modal sentences. Alternate talk (not presented) atjournee impersonels at CNRS/Paris 8, France
    [Google Scholar]