1887
image of The interface between instructed L2 pragmatics and TBLT research
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the theoretical backgrounds of instructed second language (L2) pragmatics studies have diversified, and instructional materials have been designed and implemented based on various theories of second language acquisition (SLA). As a result, the field of instructed pragmatics has made significant strides in developing empirically driven, effective instructional methods. Recently, researchers in the fields of task-based language teaching (TBLT) and L2 pragmatics have claimed there are synergistic effects when teaching pragmatics from a TBLT perspective. These researchers argue that both pragmatics instruction and TBLT approaches to language teaching highlight the importance of language use in authentic contexts and achieving communication goals. The focus of the current review article is on task design and implementation in L2 pragmatics research, particularly those studies which were conducted from a TBLT perspective. Pedagogical implications of these studies are discussed, and future directions for task-based approaches to teaching L2 pragmatics for both research and pedagogy are proposed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ap.00007.kim
2022-04-13
2022-05-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ajabshir, Z.
    (2019) The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 169–177. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.015 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alcón-Soler, E.
    (2015a) Instruction and pragmatic change during study abroad email communication. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 34–45. 10.1080/17501229.2014.995763
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2014.995763 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2015b) Pragmatic learning and study abroad: Effects of instruction and length of stay. System, 48, 62–74. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2017) Pragmatic development during study abroad: An analysis of Spanish teenagers’ request strategies in English emails. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 77–92. 10.1017/S0267190517000125
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190517000125 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2018) Effects of task supported language teaching on learners’ use and knowledge of email request mitigators. InN. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp.56–81). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.10.03alc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10.03alc [Google Scholar]
  6. Alcón-Soler, E., & Guzman-Pitarch, J. R.
    (2013) The effect of instruction on learners’ use and negotiation of refusals. InO. Martí-Arnandiz & P. Salazar-Campillo (Eds.), Refusals in instructional contexts and beyond (pp.41–63). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bacela da Silva, A.
    (2003) The effects of instruction on pragmatic development: Teaching polite refusals in English. Second Language Studies, 22, 55–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
    (1996) Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Vallenga, H.
    (2015) The effect of instruction on pragmatic routines in academic discussion. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 324–350. 10.1177/1362168814541739
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541739 [Google Scholar]
  10. Barón, J., Celaya, M. L., & Levkina, M.
    (2020) Learning pragmatics through tasks: When interaction plays a role. Applied Pragmatics, 2(1), 1–25. 10.1075/ap.18010.bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.18010.bar [Google Scholar]
  11. Belz, J. A., & Vyatkina, N.
    (2005) Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked intercultural language study: The case of German modal particles. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(1), 17–48. 10.3138/cmlr.62.1.17
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.62.1.17 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cunningham, J., & Vyatkina, N.
    (2012) Telecollaboration for professional purposes: Towards developing a formal register in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 68(4), 422–450. 10.3138/cmlr.1279
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1279 [Google Scholar]
  13. East, M.
    (2017) Research into practice: The task-based approach to instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 50(3), 412–424. 10.1017/S026144481700009X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481700009X [Google Scholar]
  14. Ekiert, M., Lampropoulou, S., Révész, A., & Torgersen, E.
    (2018) The effects of task type and L2 proficiency on discourse appropriacy in oral task performance. InN. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp.247–263). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.10.10eki
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10.10eki [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellis, R.
    (2017) Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward. Language Teaching, 50(4), 507–526. 10.1017/S0261444817000179
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000179 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C.
    (2020) Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Eslami, Z. R., Mirzaei, A., & Dini, S.
    (2015) The role of asynchronous computer mediated communication in the instruction and development of EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. System, 48, 99–111. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.008 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gilabert, R., & Barón, J.
    (2018) Independently measuring cognitive complexity in task design for interlanguage pragmatics development. InN. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp.159–190). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.10.07gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10.07gil [Google Scholar]
  19. Gómez, T., & Ede-Hernández, L.
    (2021) Effectiveness of a post-study abroad pedagogical intervention in learning compliments and compliment responses in L2 Spanish. InJ. César Félix-Brasdefer & R. Shively (Eds.), New directions in second language pragmatics (pp.81–102). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110721775‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110721775-008 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gomez-Laich, M. P., & Taguchi, N.
    (2018) Task complexity effects on interaction during a collaborative persuasive writing task. InN. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (Vol.10, pp.83–109). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10 [Google Scholar]
  21. González-Lloret, M.
    (2015) A practical guide to integrating technology into task-based language teaching. Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2019) Task-based language teaching and L2 pragmatics. InN. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp.338–352). New York/London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351164085‑22
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085-22 [Google Scholar]
  23. González-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L.
    (Eds.) (2014) Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.6 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2018) Pragmatics, tasks, and technology. InN. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp.192–214). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.10.08gon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10.08gon [Google Scholar]
  25. Hernández, T., & Boero, P.
    (2018) Explicit intervention for Spanish pragmatic development during short-term study abroad: An examination of learner request production and cognition. Foreign Language Annals, 51(2), 389–410. 10.1111/flan.12334
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12334 [Google Scholar]
  26. Iwai, T.
    (2013) Using n desu in small talk: JFL learners’ pragmatic development. InK. Kondo-Brown, Y. Saito-Abbott, S. Satsutani, M. Tsutsui, & A. Wehmeyer (Eds.), New perspectives on Japanese language learning, linguistics, and culture (pp.27–47). University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kakegawa, T.
    (2009) Development of the use of Japanese sentence-final particles through email correspondence. InN. Taguchi (Ed.), Pragmatic competence (pp.301–333). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, Y., Jung, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
    (2017) Implementation of a localized task-based course in an EFL context: A study of students’ evolving perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 632–660. 10.1002/tesq.381
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.381 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, M., Lee, H., & Kim, Y.
    (2018) Learning of Korean honorifics through collaborative tasks: Comparing heritage and non-Heritage speakers. InN. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp.28–54). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N.
    (2015) Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 656–677. 10.1111/modl.12273
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12273 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2016) Learner-learner interaction during collaborative pragmatic tasks: The role of cognitive and pragmatic task demands. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 42–57. 10.1111/flan.12180
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12180 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, I., Kim, S., Yoon, S., Nam, C., Park, S., Hong, Y., & Orr, T.
    (2010) Middle school English 2. Seoul: Chunjae Gyoyuk.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Levkina, M.
    (2018) Developing pragmatic competence through tasks in EFL contexts: Does proficiency play a role?InN. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp.137–158). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.10.06lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10.06lev [Google Scholar]
  34. Long, M.
    (2016) In defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 5–33. 10.1017/S0267190515000057
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000057 [Google Scholar]
  35. Louw, K., Derwing, T. M., & Abbott, M.
    (2010) Teaching pragmatics to L2 learners for the workplace: The job interview. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(5), 739–758. 10.3138/cmlr.66.5.739
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.5.739 [Google Scholar]
  36. McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W.
    (2007) Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107–132. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00042.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00042.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Nguyen, M. T. T., Do, H. T., Nguyen, A. T. & Pham, T. T.
    (2015) Teaching email requests in the academic context: A focus on the role of corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 24(2), 169–195. 10.1080/09658416.2015.1010543
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1010543 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nguyen, T., Pham, T., & Pham, M.
    (2012) The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(4), 416–434. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  39. Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y.
    (2016) Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 36, 73–97. 10.1017/S0267190516000015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000015 [Google Scholar]
  40. Robinson, P.
    (2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57. 10.1093/applin/22.1.27
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27 [Google Scholar]
  41. Song, J.
    (2019) Enhancing intercultural competence with 360-degree virtual reality videos. The Korean Language in America, 23(1), 85–98. 10.5325/korelangamer.23.1.0085
    https://doi.org/10.5325/korelangamer.23.1.0085 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sydorenko, T.
    (2015) The use of computer-delivered structured tasks in pragmatic instruction: An exploratory study. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(3), 333–362. 10.1515/ip‑2015‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0017 [Google Scholar]
  43. Taguchi, N.
    (2015) Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50. 10.1017/S0261444814000263
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000263 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2019) SLA and pragmatics: An overview. InTaguchi, N. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of Second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp.1–14). New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2020) Digitally mediated remote learning of pragmatics. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 353–358. 10.1111/flan.12455
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12455 [Google Scholar]
  46. Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y.
    (2016) Collaborative dialogue in learning pragmatics: Pragmatics-related episodes as an opportunity for learning request-making. Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 416–437. 10.1093/applin/amu039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu039 [Google Scholar]
  47. (Eds.) (2018a) Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2018b) Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics: An introduction. In. N. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp.2–24). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10 [Google Scholar]
  49. Taguchi, N., & Roever, C.
    (2017) Second language pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tajeddin, Z., & Hosseinpur, R.
    (2014) The impact of deductive, inductive, and L1-based consciousness-raising tasks on EFL learners’ acquisition of the request speech act. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 6(1), 73–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Taylor, G.
    (2002) Teaching gambits: The effect of instruction and task variation on the use of conversation strategies by intermediate Spanish students. Foreign Language Annals, 35(2), 171–189. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2002.tb03153.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb03153.x [Google Scholar]
  52. Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J.
    (2009) Task-based language teaching: Introducing the reader. InK. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp.1–14). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Yoshimi, D.
    (2001) Explicit instruction and JFL learners’ use of interactional discourse markers. InK. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp.223–244). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524797.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524797.016 [Google Scholar]
  54. Youn, S.
    (2018) Task-based needs analysis of L2 pragmatics in an EAP context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 86–98. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.10.005 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ap.00007.kim
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.00007.kim
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error