The competence in little words

References

1. Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C.
   (2012) Proficiency and sequential organization of L2 requests. Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 42–65. 10.1093/applin/amr031
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr031 [Google Scholar]
2. Lam, D. M. K.
   (2018) What counts as “responding”? Contingency on previous speaker contribution as a feature of interactional competence. Language Testing, 35(3), 377–401. 10.1177/0265532218758126
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758126 [Google Scholar]
3. May, L., Nakatsuhara, F., Lam, D., & Galaczi, E.
   (2020) Developing tools for learning oriented assessment of interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice. Language Testing, 37(2), 165–188. 10.1177/0265532219879044
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219879044 [Google Scholar]
4. Roever, C.
   (2011) Testing of second language pragmatics: Past and future. Language Testing, 28(4), 463–481. 10.1177/0265532210394633
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210394633 [Google Scholar]
5. Roever, C., & Kasper, G.
   (2018) Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking. Language Testing, 35(3), 331–355. 10.1177/0265532218758128
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758128 [Google Scholar]
6. Youn, S. J.
   (2015) Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32(2), 199–225. 10.1177/0265532214557113
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214557113 [Google Scholar]