1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2589-109X
  • E-ISSN: 2589-1103
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper is positioned at the interface of second/foreign language (L2) assessment and Conversation Analysis-Second Language Acquisition (CA-SLA). It explores challenges of ratability in assessing interactional competence (IC) from three dimensions: an overview of the conceptual and terminological convergence/divergence in the CA-SLA and L2 assessment literature, a micro-analytic Conversation Analysis of test-taker interactions, and the operationalisation of IC construct features in rating scales across assessment contexts. It draws insights from these dimensions into a discussion of the nature of the IC construct and the challenges of IC ratability, and concludes with suggestions on ways in which insights from CA research can contribute to addressing these issues.

Comment

A commentary article has been published for this article:
Challenges of assessing interactional competence
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ap.00014.lam
2023-02-13
2024-05-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auer, P., & Zima, E.
    (2021) On word searches, gaze, and co-participation. Gesprächsforschung, 221, 390–425.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
    (1996) Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bull, G., & Anstey, M.
    (2010) Evolving pedagogies: Reading and writing in a multimodal world. Education Services Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Burch, A. R., & Kley, K.
    (2020) Assessing interactional competence: The role of intersubjectivity in a paired-speaking assessment task. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 9(1), 25–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common european framework of references for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, L. & Papageorgiou, S.
    (2021) Complementary strengths? Evaluation of a hybrid human-machine scoring approach for a test of oral academic English. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(4), 437–455. 10.1080/0969594X.2021.1979466
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1979466 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ducasse, A. M.
    (2010) Interaction in paired oral proficiency assessment in Spanish. Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fulcher, G.
    (1993) The construction and validation of rating scales for oral tests in English as a foreign language [unpublished PhD thesis]. Lancaster University.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2010) Practical Language Testing. Hodder Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Galaczi, E. D.
    (2008) Peer-peer interaction in a speaking test: The case of the first certificate in English examination. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(2), 89–119. 10.1080/15434300801934702
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300801934702 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2014) Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests?. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 553–574. 10.1093/applin/amt017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt017 [Google Scholar]
  12. Galaczi, E. D., & Taylor, L.
    (2018) Interactional competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 219–236. 10.1080/15434303.2018.1453816
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1453816 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gan, Z.
    (2010) Interaction in group oral assessment: A case study of higher- and lower-scoring students. Language Testing, 27(4), 585–602. 10.1177/0265532210364049
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210364049 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gan, Z., Davison, C., & Hamp-Lyons, L.
    (2009) Topic negotiation in peer group oral assessment situations: A conversation analytic approach. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 315–334. 10.1093/applin/amn035
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn035 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, C.
    (2013) The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2017) Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139016735
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139016735 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hall, J. K.
    (2018) From L2 interactional competence to L2 interactional repertoires: Reconceptualising the objects of L2 learning. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 25–39. 10.1080/19463014.2018.1433050
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1433050 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hall, J. K., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2011) L2 interactional competence and development. InJ. K. Hall, J. Hellermann & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 Interactional Competence and Development (pp.1–18). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847694072‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847694072-003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hırçın Çoban, M., & Sert, O.
    (2020) Resolving interactional troubles and maintaining progressivity in paired speaking assessment in an EFL context. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 9(1), 64–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R.
    (1999) Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ikeda, N.
    (2017) Measuring L2 oral pragmatic abilities for use in social contexts: Development and validation of an assessment instrument for L2 pragmatics performance in university settings [unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jefferson, G.
    (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InG. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.13–31). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  23. Jenkins, S. & Parra, I.
    (2003) Multiple layers of meaning in an oral proficiency test: The complementary roles of nonverbal, paralinguistic, and verbal behaviors in assessment decisions. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 90–107. 10.1111/1540‑4781.00180
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00180 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kasper, G.
    (2006) Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review, 191, 83–99. 10.1075/aila.19.07kas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.07kas [Google Scholar]
  25. Lam, D. M. K.
    (2021) Don’t turn a deaf ear: A case for assessing interactive listening. Applied Linguistics. 10.1093/applin/amaa064
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa064 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lazaraton, A.
    (2002) A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mackey, A.
    (1999) Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587. 10.1017/S0272263199004027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004027 [Google Scholar]
  28. Markee, N.
    (2008) Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427. 10.1093/applin/amm052
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm052 [Google Scholar]
  29. May, L.
    (2011) Interactional competence in a paired speaking test: Features salient to raters. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(2), 127–145. 10.1080/15434303.2011.565845
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.565845 [Google Scholar]
  30. McNamara, T. F., & Roever, C.
    (2006) Language testing: The social dimension. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nakatsuhara, F.
    (2013) The co-construction of conversation in group oral tests. Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑03584‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03584-1 [Google Scholar]
  32. Nakatsuhara, F., May, L., Lam, D., & Galaczi, E. D.
    (2018) Learning-oriented feedback in the development and assessment of interactional competence. Research Notes, 701, 1–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Nguyen, H. T.
    (2019) Deepening roots and broadening horizons in interactional competence research and praxis. InM. R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence (pp.397–412). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315177021‑15
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177021-15 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ockey, G. J., & Chukharev-Hudilainen, E.
    (2021) Human versus computer partner in the paired oral discussion test. Applied Linguistics [Advance articles], 1–21. 10.1093/applin/amaa067
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa067 [Google Scholar]
  35. Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2018) Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 3–24. 10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2019) On the nature and the development of L2 interactional competence. InM. R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence (pp.25–59). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315177021‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177021-2 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E.
    (2018) L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 555–578. 10.1093/applin/amw021
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw021 [Google Scholar]
  38. Roever, C., & Kasper, G.
    (2018) Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking. Language Testing, 35(3), 331–355. 10.1177/0265532218758128
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758128 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sacks, H.
    (1987) On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. InG. Button & J. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp.54–69). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  42. Seedhouse, P., & Satar, M.
    (2021) The Rashomon effect: which features of a speaker’s talk do listeners notice?Classroom Discourse. 10.1080/19463014.2021.1923540
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.1923540 [Google Scholar]
  43. Svennevig, J.
    (1999) Getting acquainted in conversation: A study of initial interactions. John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. UCLES
    UCLES (2019) C1 advanced: Handbook for teachers. Retrieved from: https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/167804-cambridge-english-advanced-handbook.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Upshur, J. A., & Turner, C. E.
    (1995) Constructing rating scales for second language tests. ELT Journal, 49(1), 3–12. 10.1093/elt/49.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  46. van Moere, A.
    (2012) A psycholinguistic approach to oral language assessment. Language Testing, 29(3), 325–344. 10.1177/0265532211424478
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211424478 [Google Scholar]
  47. Waring, H. Z.
    (2018) Teaching L2 interactional competence: Problems and possibilities. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 57–67. 10.1080/19463014.2018.1434082
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1434082 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2019) Developing interactional competence with limited linguistic resources. InM. R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence (pp.215–227). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315177021‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177021-9 [Google Scholar]
  49. Xu, J.
    (2014) Displaying status of recipiency through reactive tokens in Mandarin task-oriented interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 741, 33–51. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.008 [Google Scholar]
  50. Youn, S. J.
    (2015) Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32(2), 199–225. 10.1177/0265532214557113
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214557113 [Google Scholar]
  51. Youn, S. J., & Burch, A. R.
    (2020) Where Conversation Analysis meets Language Assessment: Toward expanding epistemologies and validity evidence. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 9(1), iii–xvii.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Young, R. F.
    (2008) Language and interaction: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ap.00014.lam
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.00014.lam
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error