1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2589-109X
  • E-ISSN: 2589-1103
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Comment

This is a commentary article in response to the following content:
Assessing interactional competence
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ap.00015.hal
2023-02-24
2024-04-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Couper–Kuhlen, E.
    (2014) What does grammar tell us about action?Pragmatics, 24(3), 623–647. 10.1075/prag.24.3.08cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.3.08cou [Google Scholar]
  2. Couper–Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M.
    (2018) Interactional linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dingemanse, M., Roberts, S. G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Drew, P., Floyd, S.,
    (2015) Universal principles in the repair of communication problems. PLOS ONE, 10(9). 10.1371/journal.pone.0136100
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136100 [Google Scholar]
  4. Enfield, N. J., & Sidnell, J.
    (2014) Language presupposes an enchronic infrastructure for social interaction. InD. Dor, C. Knight, & J. Lewis (Eds.), The social origins of language (pp.92–104). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665327.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665327.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  5. Hall, J. K.
    (2018) From interactional competence to interactional repertoires: Reconceptualizing the goal of L2 learning. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 25–39. 10.1080/19463014.2018.1433050
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1433050 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2019) The contributions of conversation analysis and interactional linguistics to a usage-based understanding of language: Expanding the transdisciplinary framework. The Modern Language Journal, 103(51), (supplement), 80–94. 10.1111/modl.12535
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12535 [Google Scholar]
  7. Heritage, J.
    (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kendrick, K.
    (2017) Using conversation analysis in the lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 1–11. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1267911
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1267911 [Google Scholar]
  9. Levinson, S.
    (2006) On the human ‘Interaction Engine’. InN. J. Enfield & S. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp.39–69). Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Schegloff, E.
    (1990) On the organization of sequences as a source of ‘coherence’ in talk-in-interaction. InB. Dorval (Ed.), Conversational organization and its development (pp.51–77). Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2006) Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In byN. J. Enfield & S. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp.70–96). Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Seedhouse, P.
    (2019) The dual personality of ‘topic’ in the IELTS Speaking Test. ELT Journal, 73(3), 247–256. 10.1093/elt/ccz009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz009 [Google Scholar]
  13. Stivers, T.
    (2008) Stance, alignment and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ap.00015.hal
Loading
  • Article Type: Article Commentary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error