1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2589-109X
  • E-ISSN: 2589-1103
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Comment

This is a commentary article in response to the following content:
Assessing interactional competence
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ap.00017.fil
2023-02-28
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Deppermann, A., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2021) Longitudinal conversation analysis – Introduction to the special issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 127–141. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1899707
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899707 [Google Scholar]
  2. Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek-Doehler, S.
    (Eds.) (2011) L2 Interactional competence and development. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847694072
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847694072 [Google Scholar]
  3. Huth, T.
    (2021) Conceptualizing interactional learning targets for the second language curriculum. InS. Kunitz, O. Sert, & N. Markee (Eds.), Emerging issues in classroom discourse and interaction: Theoretical and applied CA perspectives on pedagogy (pp. 359–382). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑52193‑6_18
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52193-6_18 [Google Scholar]
  4. Huth, T., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C.
    (2006) How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics?Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 53–79. 10.1191/1362168806lr184oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr184oa [Google Scholar]
  5. Huth, T., Betz, E., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C.
    (2019) Rethinking language teacher training: Steps for making talk-in-interaction research accessible to practitioners. Classroom Discourse, 10(1), 99–122. 10.1080/19463014.2019.1570529
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1570529 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kley, K.
    (2019) What counts as evidence for interactional competence? Developing rating criteria for a German classroom-based paired speaking test. InM. R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 291–321). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315177021‑12
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177021-12 [Google Scholar]
  7. Kunitz, S.
    (2018) L1/L2 alternation practices in students’ task planning. InA. Filipi & N. Markee (Eds.), Conversation analysis and language alternation: Capturing transitions in the classroom (pp. 107–128). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.295.06kun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.295.06kun [Google Scholar]
  8. Markee, N., & Kasper, G.
    (2004) Classroom talks: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 491–500. 10.1111/j.0026‑7902.2004.t01‑14‑.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-14-.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2021) Toward a coherent understanding of L2 interactional competence: Epistemologies of language learning and teaching. InS. Kunitz, O. Sert, & N. Markee (Eds.), Emerging issues in classroom discourse and interaction: Theoretical and applied CA perspectives on pedagogy (pp. 19–36). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑52193‑6_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52193-6_2 [Google Scholar]
  10. Pekarek Doehler, S., Wagner, J., & González-Martínez, E.
    (Eds.) (2018) Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑57007‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9 [Google Scholar]
  11. Sandlund, E., & Greer, T.
    (2020) How do raters understand rubrics for assessing L2 interactional engagement? A comparative study of CA- and non-CA-formulated performance descriptors. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 9(1), 128–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  13. Tran, Q. H.
    (2018) Language alternation during L2 classroom discussion tasks. InA. Filipi & N. Markee (Eds.), Conversation analysis and language alternation: Capturing transitions in the classroom (pp. 165–182). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.295.09tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.295.09tra [Google Scholar]
  14. Walters, F. S.
    (2021) Some considerations regarding validation in CA-informed oral testing for the L2 classroom. InS. Kunitz, O. Sert, & N. Markee (Eds.), Emerging issues in classroom discourse and interaction: Theoretical and applied CA perspectives on pedagogy (pp. 383–406). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑52193‑6_19
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52193-6_19 [Google Scholar]
  15. Wei, L.
    (2018) Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30. 10.1093/applin/amx039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ap.00017.fil
Loading
  • Article Type: Article Commentary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error