1887
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-109X
  • E-ISSN: 2589-1103
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper discusses the oral pragmatic ability of current and prospective university students (international students) in an English-speaking country by examining how they are differentiated in the assessed levels of this target ability. A total of 67 students, all of whom were second language (L2) speakers of English, completed a set of oral discourse production tasks simulating interpersonal settings encountered at university. Their task performances were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The results show a substantial gap between the highest performing university students and the prospective students in terms of their measured pragmatic ability. However, some university students scored quite poorly and were actually outperformed by a certain number of prospective students who were preparing to satisfy the English language requirements for university admission. These findings suggest that being a university student is not necessarily an indicator of having sufficiently developed pragmatic ability to participate in interpersonal settings in an academic environment. The findings shed light on the importance of providing students learning and assessment opportunities for pragmatics so they can gain greater awareness of their own developing pragmatic ability in an English-medium university.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ap.19039.ike
2021-02-01
2021-04-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Gahtani, S. , & Roever, C.
    (2012) Proficiency and sequential organization of L2 requests. Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 42–65. 10.1093/applin/amr031
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr031 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2013) ‘Hi doctor, give me handouts’: Low-proficiency learners and requests. ETL Journal, 67(4), 413–424.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson, J. , & Heritage, J.
    (Eds (1984) Structures of social action. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, P. , & Levinson, S. C.
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen, A. D.
    (2018) Learning pragmatics from native and non-native language teachers. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/COHEN9924
    https://doi.org/10.21832/COHEN9924 [Google Scholar]
  6. Crystal, D.
    (1997) The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Galaczi, E.
    (2014) Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests?Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 553–574. 10.1093/applin/amt017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt017 [Google Scholar]
  8. Grabowski, K.
    (2013) Investigating the construct validity of a role-play test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge at multiple proficiency levels. In S. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp. 149–171). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137003522_6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003522_6 [Google Scholar]
  9. Heritage, J.
    (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Policy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hudson, T. , Detmer, E. , & Brown, J. D.
    (1992) A framework for testing cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical report #2). University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ikeda, N.
    (2017) Measuring L2 oral pragmatic abilities for use in social contexts: Development and validation of an assessment instrument for L2 pragmatic performance in university settings [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ishida, M.
    (2009) Development of interactional competence: Changes in the use of ne in L2 Japanese during study abroad. In H. T. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspective (pp. 351–385). National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai‘i.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2011) Engaging in another person’s telling as a recipient in L2 Japanese: Development of interactional competence during one-year study abroad. In G. Pallotti & J. Wanger (Eds.), L2 Learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 45–85). National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai‘i.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ishihara, N.
    (2014) Assessment of pragmatics in the classroom. In N. Ishihara & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Teaching and learning pragmatics (pp. 287–317). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315833842
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833842 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kane, M. T.
    (2006) Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational Measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Greenwood Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kasper, G.
    (2006) Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review, 19, 83–99. 10.1075/aila.19.07kas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.07kas [Google Scholar]
  17. Kasper, G. , & Ross, S.
    (2013) Assessing second language pragmatics: An overview and introductions. In S. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp. 1–40). Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim, Y.
    (2009) The Korean discourse markers-nuntey and kuntey in native-nonnative conversation: An acquisitional perspective. In H. T. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspective (pp. 317–350). National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai‘i.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Linacre, M.
    (2014a) A user’s guide to FACETS Rasch-Model computer programs. [Computer software]. Winsteps.com.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Linacre, J. M.
    (2014b) Facets computer program for many facet Rasch measurement (Version 3.71.4) [Computer software]. Winsteps.com.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McNamara, T. F.
    (1996) Measuring second language performance. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. McNamara, T. F. , & Roever, C.
    (2006) Language testing: The social dimension. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Okada, Y.
    (2010) Role play in oral proficiency interviews: Interactive footing and interactional competencies. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(16), 1647–1468. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pekarek Doehler, S. , & Pochon-Berger, E.
    (2011) Developing ‘methods’ for interaction: A cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. In J. K. Hall , J. Hellermann , & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 206–243). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847694072‑010
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847694072-010 [Google Scholar]
  25. Roever, C.
    (2005) Testing ESL pragmatics. Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑04780‑6
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04780-6 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2011) Testing of second language pragmatics: Past and future. Language Testing, 28(4), 463–481. 10.1177/0265532210394633
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210394633 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2013) Testing implicature under operational conditions. In S. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp. 43–64). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137003522_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003522_2 [Google Scholar]
  28. Roever, C. , Fraser, C. , & Elder, C.
    (2014) Testing ESL sociopragmatics: Development and validation of a web-based test battery. Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑04598‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04598-7 [Google Scholar]
  29. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  30. Searle, J. R.
    (1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  31. Taguchi, N.
    (2012) Context, individual differences and pragmatic competence. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847696106
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847696106 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2019) The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351164085
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085 [Google Scholar]
  33. Taguchi, N. , & Roever, C.
    (2017) Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Timpe, V.
    (2013) Assessing intercultural language learning. Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Walters, F. S.
    (2007) A conversation-analytic hermeneutic rating protocol to assess L2 oral pragmatic competence. Language Testing, 24(2), 155–183. 10.1177/0265532207076362
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207076362 [Google Scholar]
  36. Youn, S. J.
    (2013) Validating task-based assessment of L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Hawai‘i at Manoa.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2015) Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32(2), 199–225. 10.1177/0265532214557113
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214557113 [Google Scholar]
  38. Youn, S.J. , & Bogorevich, V.
    (2019) Assessment in L2 pragmatics. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 308–321). Routledge. 10.4324/9781351164085‑20
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085-20 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ap.19039.ike
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.19039.ike
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): English as a second language , higher education , oral pragmatics and performance assessment
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error