Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2589-109X
  • E-ISSN: 2589-1103
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The relationship between second language (L2) comprehensibility and pragmatics is explored in two experiments involving instruction of speech acts to learners enrolled in a Language Instruction for Newcomers to Canada program. The study was designed to determine whether improved pragmatic competence results in enhanced comprehensibility (how easy L2 speech is to understand). Two intact classes participated; one received 25 hours of pragmatics instruction, while the control group received the standard curriculum (no focus on pragmatics). Both classes were recorded in role-plays based on several scenarios at pre- and post-test. Transcriptions of the role-plays were coded according to a rubric; although the control group showed superior performance at the outset, the experimental group’s scores exceeded those of the Control group at post-test with a medium effect size. A subset of pre- and posttest role-plays (two refusals and two requests) were randomly assigned to 56 native English listeners who rated the speech samples for social appropriateness, comprehensibility, and fluency. The experimental group’s posttest productions on all scenarios were perceived as significantly more socially appropriate, with three scenarios showing significant improvement in comprehensibility. Although one scenario improved in fluency, another showed a decline. The results suggest that pragmatics instruction enhances L2 speech comprehensibility.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (2017) Acquisition of L2 pragmatics. InS. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp.224–245). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676968‑13
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-13 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2018) Matching modality in L2 pragmatics research design. System, 75, 13–22. 10.1016/j.system.2018.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Su, Y.
    (2017) The effect of corpus-based instruction on pragmatic routines. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 76–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Vellenga, H. E.
    (2012) The effect of instruction on conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. System, 40, 77–89. 10.1016/j.system.2012.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Citizenship and Immigration Canada
    Citizenship and Immigration Canada (2010) Evaluation of the Language Instruction for Newcomers to Canada (LINC) program. Evaluation Division, Citizenship and Immigration Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T.
    (2018) Linguistic dimensions of L2 accentedness and comprehensibility vary across speaking tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 443–457. 10.1017/S027226311700016X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311700016X [Google Scholar]
  7. Derwing, T. M.
    (1996) Elaborative detail: Help or hindrance to the nonnative speaker?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 283–297. 10.1017/S0272263100015035
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015035 [Google Scholar]
  8. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (1997) Accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 1–16. 10.1017/S0272263197001010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2009) Comprehensibility as a factor in listener interaction preferences: Implications for the workplace. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 181–202. 10.3138/cmlr.66.2.181
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.2.181 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2013) The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63, 163–185. 10.1111/lang.12000
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12000 [Google Scholar]
  11. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Foote, J. A., Waugh, E., & Fleming, J.
    (2014) Opening the window on comprehensible pronunciation after 19 years: A workplace training study. Language Learning, 64, 526–548. 10.1111/lang.12053
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12053 [Google Scholar]
  12. Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2004) Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655–679. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00282.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Derwing, T. M., & Waugh, E.
    (2012) Language skills and the social integration of Canada’s adult immigrants. IRPP Study 31. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Diepenbroek, L., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2013) To what extent do popular ESL textbooks incorporate oral fluency and pragmatic development?TESL Canada Journal, 30, 1–20. 10.18806/tesl.v30i7.1149
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v30i7.1149 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ehrlich, S., Avery, P., & Yorio, C.
    (1989) Discourse structure and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 397–414. 10.1017/S027226310000841X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310000841X [Google Scholar]
  16. Furniss, E. A.
    (2016) Teaching the pragmatics of Russian conversation using a corpus-referred website. Language Learning & Technology, 20, 38–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gauci, P.
    (2015) Teaching L2 pragmatics: From an empirical study to recommendations for pedagogical practice. InS. Gesuato, F. Bianchi, & W. Cheng (Eds), Teaching, learning and investigating pragmatics: Principles, methods and practices (pp.109–132). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Government of Canada
    Government of Canada (2016) National occupation classification (2016). noc.esdc.gc.ca/English/NOC/ProfileQuickSearch.aspx?val=6&val1=6421&ver=16
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gumperz, J. J.
    (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  20. Inceoglu, S.
    (2018) Exploring the effects of instruction on L2 French learner pronunciation, accentedness, comprehensibility and fluency. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation. doi: 10.1075/jslp.18004.inc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.18004.inc [Google Scholar]
  21. Incera, S., Shah, A. P., McLennan, C. T., & Wetzel, M. T.
    (2017) Sentence context influences the subjective perception of foreign accents. Acta Psychologica, 172, 71–76. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.011 [Google Scholar]
  22. Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2012) Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 475–505. 10.1017/S0272263112000150
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000150 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ishihara, N.
    (2010) Instructional pragmatics: Bridging teaching, research and teacher education. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 938–953. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2010.00242.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00242.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D.
    (2010) Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jiang, X.
    (2006) Suggestions: What should ESL students know?System, 34, 36–54. 10.1016/j.system.2005.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kondo, S.
    (2010) Apologies: Raising learners’ cross-cultural awareness. InA. Martinez-Flor & E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp.145–162). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.26.09kon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.26.09kon [Google Scholar]
  27. Krahn, H., Derwing, T. M., Mulder, M., & Wilkinson, L.
    (2000) Educated and underemployed: Refugee integration into the Canadian labour market. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 1, 59–84. 10.1007/s12134‑000‑1008‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-000-1008-2 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2017) lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  29. Laroche, L., & Rutherford, D.
    (2007) Recruiting, retaining and promoting culturally different employees. Routledge. 10.4324/9780080468334
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080468334 [Google Scholar]
  30. MacIntyre, P. D.
    (2007) Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. Modern Language Journal, 91, 564–576. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00623.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00623.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Momani, B., & Stirk, J.
    (2017) Diversity dividend: Canada’s global advantage. Centre for International Governance Innovation and Foundation, Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Picot, G., & Sweetman, A.
    (2012) Making it in Canada. Immigration outcomes and policies. IRPP Study29. Institute for Research on Public Policy.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F.
    (2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912. 10.1111/lang.12079
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079 [Google Scholar]
  35. Plonsky, L., & Zhuang, J.
    (2019) A meta-analysis of L2 pragmatics instruction. InN. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp.297–307). Routledge. 10.4324/9781351164085‑19
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085-19 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rutherford, D., Laroche, L. F., & Saphiere, D. H.
    (2009) Cultural detective Canada. https://www.culturedetective.com
  37. Saito, K., & Akiyama, Y.
    (2017) Linguistic correlates of comprehensibility in second language Japanese speech. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3, 199–217. 10.1075/jslp.3.2.02sai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.2.02sai [Google Scholar]
  38. Schmidt, R.
    (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158. 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129 [Google Scholar]
  39. (1995) Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (2010) Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. InW. M. Chan, S. Chi, K. N. Cin, J. Istanto, M. Nagami, J. W. Sew, T. Suthiwan, & I. Walker (Eds), Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010, Singapore, December2–4 (pp.721–737). National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Taguchi, N.
    (2011) Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. 10.1017/S0267190511000018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000018 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2015) Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48, 1–50. 10.1017/S0261444814000263
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000263 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2018) Description and explanation of pragmatic development: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. System, 75, 23–32. 10.1016/j.system.2018.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.010 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tatsuki, D. H.
    (2019) Instructional material development in L2 pragmatics. InN. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp.322–337). Routledge. 10.4324/9781351164085‑21
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085-21 [Google Scholar]
  45. Tatsuki, D. H., & Houck, N. R.
    (Eds.) (2010) Pragmatics: Teaching speech acts. TESOL.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Taylor Reid, K., Trofimovich, P., & O’Brien, M.
    (2019) Social attitudes and speech ratings: Effects of positive and negative bias on multiage listeners’ judgments of second language speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 419–442. 10.1017/S0272263118000244
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000244 [Google Scholar]
  47. Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2015) The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36, 326–344. 10.1093/applin/amu076
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu076 [Google Scholar]
  48. Timpe-Laughlin, V.
    (2019) Pragmatics learning in the workplace. InN. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp.413–428). Routledge. 10.4324/9781351164085‑27
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085-27 [Google Scholar]
  49. Twitchin, J.
    (Producer/Director) (1979) Crosstalk [Film]. BBC Enterprises.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Varonis, E., & Gass, S.
    (1982) The comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4(2), 114–136. 10.1017/S027226310000437X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310000437X [Google Scholar]
  51. Yates, L.
    (2004) The ‘secret rules of language’: Tackling pragmatics in the classroom. Prospect, 19, 3–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2008) The not-so generic skills: Teaching employability communication skills to adult migrants. Teaching in Action. AMEP Research Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (2010) Dinkas down under: Request performance in simulated workplace interaction. InG. Kasper, H. Thi Nguyen, D. R. Yoshimi, & J. K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Pragmatics & language learning (Vol.12, pp.113–140). University of Hawaiʻi, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. (2017) Learning how to speak: Pronunciation, pragmatics and practicalities in the classroom and beyond. Language Teaching, 50, 227–246. 10.1017/S0261444814000238
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000238 [Google Scholar]
  55. Yates, L., & Springall, J.
    (2010) Soften up! Successful requests in the workplace. InD. H. Tatsuki & N. R. Houck (Eds.), Pragmatics: Teaching speech acts (pp.67–86). TESOL.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error