1887
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2589-109X
  • E-ISSN: 2589-1103
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The study investigates the stance marker in the progressive aspect, challenging the view established in the ESL community that state verbs are used exclusively in the simple aspect and an overall neglect of the pragmatic meaning associated with different structural forms. The study shows that a corpus-based analysis of naturally occurring data proves the opposite: While the simple aspect remains the prevalent use, in progressive displays important pragmatic functions, indicative of immediacy, expression of agency, and intensity. The paper discusses the identified pragmatic functions and relates them to the communicative goals of the registers they are attested in, such as blogs and news reports. News broadcasts, for example, feature interview sources offering their subjective take; in opinion blogs, writers share experience offering evaluation. Speaker agency is thus a crucial component of influencing public opinion or the construction of the online persona. The study has implications for teaching, suggesting that students need exposure to and a thorough understanding of this authentic use.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ap.22011.gra
2025-08-05
2026-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adolphs, S.
    (2008) Corpus and context. Investigating pragmatic functions in spoken discourse. John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.30
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.30 [Google Scholar]
  2. Belli, S.
    (2017) An analysis of stative verbs used with the progressive aspect in corpus–informed textbooks. English Language Teaching, 11(1), 120–135. 10.5539/elt.v11n1p120
    https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n1p120 [Google Scholar]
  3. Biber, D.
    (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2006) Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 97–116. 10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
    (2019) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108686136
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G.
    (2002) Student grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
    (2018) Register variation online. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316388228
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316388228 [Google Scholar]
  8. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brinton, L. J.
    (2017) The evolution of pragmatic markers in English, pathways of change. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316416013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316416013 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chaemsaithong, K.
    (2017) Evaluative stancetaking in courtroom opening statements. Folia Linguistica, 51(1), 103–132. 10.1515/flin‑2017‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2017-0003 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chafe, W.
    (1986) Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. InW. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 261–272). Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M.
    (2001) The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus–based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 97–141. https://www.eva.mpg.de/documents/deGruyter/Diessel_Acquisition_CogLing_2001_1556131.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Emmerson, P.
    (2002) Business grammar builder for class and self–study. Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Erman, B.
    (1987) Pragmatic expressions in English. A study of you know, you see and I mean in face–to–face conversation. Almquist & Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fetzer, A.
    (2008) ‘And I think that is a very straightforward way of dealing with it.’: The communicative function of cognitive verbs in political discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(4), 384–396. 10.1177/0261927X08322481
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322481 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2014) I think, I mean and I believe in political discourse: Collocates, functions and distribution. Functions of Language, 21(1), 67–94. 10.1075/fol.21.1.05fet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21.1.05fet [Google Scholar]
  17. Fordyce, K.
    (2014) ‘The differential effects of explicit and implicit instruction on EFL learners’ use of epistemic stance.’ Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 6–28. 10.1093/applin/ams076
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams076 [Google Scholar]
  18. Freund, N.
    (2016) Recent change in the use of stative verbs in the progressive form in British English: I’m loving it. Language Studies Working Papers, 71, 50–61. https://cms9–prod.rdg.ac.uk/elal/–/media/project/uor–main/schools/departments/elal/lswp/lswp7/elal_7_freund.pdf?la=en&hash=C1403C6C7805F3F1CDA6E1F5E5CC4BEE
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Boyd, E.
    (2017) Epistemic stance in spoken L2 English: The effect of task and speaker style. Applied Linguistics, 38(5), 613–637. 10.1093/applin/amv055
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv055 [Google Scholar]
  20. Granath, S., & Wherrity, M.
    (2014) “I’m loving you — and knowing it too”: Aspect and so–called stative verbs. Linguistics and Philology, 4(1), 2–22. kau.diva–portal.org/smash/get/diva2:704600/FULLTEXT01.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoey, M.
    (2005) Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K.
    (2018) ‘We believe that …’: Changes in an academic stance marker. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 38(2), 139–161. 10.1080/07268602.2018.1400498
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2018.1400498 [Google Scholar]
  23. Imran, M., & Ghani, M.
    (2017) Acceptability of stative verbs in progressive form within linguistic context. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(4), 67–74. 10.5539/ijel.v7n4p67
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n4p67 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2019) Role of progressive aspect in the definitions of stative and dynamic verbs. InJ. Haldane, R. Donovan, & D. E. Hall (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Language Learning (pp. 1–12). IAFOR. https://papers.iafor.org/wp–content/uploads/papers/ecll2019/ECLL2019_50154.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kärkkäinen, E.
    (2003) Epistemic stance in English conversation. A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on ‘I think’. John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.115
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.115 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kiesling, S.
    (2020) Investment in a model of stancetaking: I mean and just sayin’. Language Sciences, 821, 101333. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101333
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101333 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mair, C.
    (2006) Twentieth–century English. History, variation and standardization. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486951
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486951 [Google Scholar]
  28. McHugh, M.
    (2012) Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3900052/. 10.11613/BM.2012.031
    https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031 [Google Scholar]
  29. Morley, J., & Partington, A.
    (2009) A few frequently asked questions about semantic — or evaluative — prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 139–158. 10.1075/ijcl.14.2.01mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.2.01mor [Google Scholar]
  30. O’Keeffe, A., Clancy, B., & Adolphs, S.
    (2019) Introducing pragmatics in use. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429342950
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429342950 [Google Scholar]
  31. Parrott, M.
    (2010) Grammar for English language teachers. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009406536
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009406536 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pichler, H., & Hesson, A.
    (2016) Discourse–pragmatic variation across situations, varieties, ages: I DON’T KNOW in sociolinguistic and medical interviews. Language and Communication, 481, 1–18. 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  33. Prażmo, E.
    (2018) The modal potential in the English present progressive. Brno Studies in English, 44(1), 43–62. 10.5817/BSE2018‑1‑3
    https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2018-1-3 [Google Scholar]
  34. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Reinders, H., & Khojasteh, L.
    (2013) How textbooks (and learners) get it wrong: A corpus study of modal auxiliary verbs. Applied Research on English Language, 2(1), 33–44. https://hdl.handle.net/10652/2388
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Römer, U.
    (2004) Comparing real and ideal language learner input: The use of an EFL textbook corpus in corpus linguistics and language teaching. InG. Aston, S. Bernardini, & D. Stewart (Eds.), Corpora and language learners (pp. 151–168). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.17.12rom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.17.12rom [Google Scholar]
  37. Sinclair, J.
    (1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Smitterberg, E.
    (2005) The progressive in 19th–century English: A process of integration. Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004333086
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333086 [Google Scholar]
  39. Swan, M., & Walter, C.
    (2003) The good grammar book. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Szczyrbak, M.
    (2021) I’m thinking and you’re saying: Speaker stance and the progressive of mental verbs in courtroom interaction. Text and Talk, 41(2), 239–260. 10.1515/text‑2019‑0145
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-0145 [Google Scholar]
  41. Vellenga, H.
    (2004) Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely?TESL–EJ, 8(2), 25–38. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068091.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhao, L., Dehé, N., & Murphy, V. A.
    (2018) From pitch to purpose: The prosodic–pragmatic mapping of [I + verb] belief constructions in English and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, 1231, 57–77. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.015 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.22011.gra
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.22011.gra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cognition verbs; corpus pragmatics; immediacy; intensity; progressive aspect; stance markers
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error