1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Applied Pragmatics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of The influence of closeness and anonymity on peer feedback
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of closeness and anonymity between Japanese university students on their degree of discomfort and quality of feedback exchanged during L1 peer feedback in an L2 English classroom. The investigations focus on learners’ praise and critique exchanged in their first language when reviewing each other’s English essays, as well as their reported degree of discomfort during the process. These variables are investigated by pairing each participant with three classmates: a known classmate with whom they are mutually close, a known classmate with whom they are mutually distant, and a classmate whose identity is unknown. These pairs exchange feedback on their writing and rate their level of discomfort when giving and receiving feedback. The investigations find lower degrees of discomfort among learners who share a close relationship. Furthermore, the results indicate that anonymity does not reduce the discomfort experienced by learners during the peer feedback process. The results also show that learners exchange similar feedback, regardless of their closeness or anonymity. The study alleviates concerns that closeness or anonymity influences the quality of peer feedback exchanged in the EFL classroom, with the caveat that learners who are close may experience the least discomfort during the process.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ap.22014.tu
2026-03-05
2026-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ap.22014.tu
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmad, I.
    (2014) Mixed messages in criticisms in Iranian PhD dissertation defenses. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, (), –. 10.1558/japl.35211
     https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.35211 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alsulami, S.
    (2015) The effectiveness of social distance on requests. Arab World English Journal, (), –. 10.24093/awej/vol6no3.24
     https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol6no3.24 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aron, A., Aron, E., & Smollan, D.
    (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.63.4.596
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bos, A., & Tan, E.
    (2019) Effects of anonymity on online peer review in second-language writing. Computers & Education, . 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103638
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103638 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, P., & Levinson, S.
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cao, Z., Yu, S., & Huang, J.
    (2019) A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates’ learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from a case study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, , –. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheng, W., & Warren, M.
    (2005) Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1191/0265532205lt298oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532205lt298oa [Google Scholar]
  8. Cote, R.
    (2014) Peer feedback in anonymous peer review in an EFL writing class in Spain. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, , –. 10.26817/16925777.144
     https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.144 [Google Scholar]
  9. Culpeper, J.
    (2011) Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, J., Shauer, G., Marti, L., Mei, M., & Minna, N.
    (2014) Impoliteness and emotions in a cross-cultural perspective. SPELL: Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Don, Z., & Ahmad, I.
    (2013) Interactionally achieving face in criticism-criticism response exchanges. Language & Communication, (), –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2013.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  12. Faigley, L., & Witte, S.
    (1981) Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, (), –. 10.58680/ccc198115887
     https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198115887 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fukuda, A., & Asato, N.
    (2004) Universal politeness theory: Application to the use of Japanese honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gächter, S., Starmer, C., & Tufano, F.
    (2015) Measuring the closeness of relationships: A comprehensive evaluation of the ‘inclusion of the other in the self’ scale. PLoS ONE, (). 10.1371/journal.pone.0129478
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129478 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gaffney, A.
    (2015) Uncovering embedded face threat mitigation in landscape architecture critique feedback. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, (), –. 10.14434/josotl.v15i4.13456
     https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i4.13456 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goffman, E.
    (1955) On face-work. Psychiatry, (), –. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goldsmith, D., & MacGeorge, E.
    (2000) The impact of politeness and relationship on perceived quality of advice about a problem. Human Communication Research, (), –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2000.tb00757.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00757.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Guardado, M., & Shi, L.
    (2007) ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, , –. 10.1016/j.compcom.2007.03.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2007.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hadden, A., & Frisby, B.
    (2019) Face threat mitigation in feedback: An examination of student feedback anxiety, self-efficacy, and perceived emotional support. Communication Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/01463373.2018.1531043
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2018.1531043 [Google Scholar]
  20. Haugh, M., Culpeper, J., & Johnson, D.
    (2017) (Im)politeness: Metalinguistic labels and concepts in English. InR. Giora & M. Haugh (Eds.), Doing pragmatics interculturally: Cognitive, philosophical, and sociopragmatic perspectives (pp.–). De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hopkinson, C.
    (2021) Realizations of oppositional speech acts in English: A contrastive analysis of discourse in L1 and L2 settings. Intercultural Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1515/ip‑2021‑2002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2021-2002 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hosack, I.
    (2004) The effects of anonymous feedback on Japanese university students’ attitudes towards peer review. Ritsumeikanhougaku Bessatsu, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Huisman, B., Saab, N., Broek, P., & Driel, J.
    (2019) The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896 [Google Scholar]
  24. Itakura, H., & Tsui, A.
    (2011) Evaluation in academic discourse: Managing criticism in Japanese and English book reviews. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.023
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.023 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kaya, F.
    (2021) Emotions related to identifiable/anonymous peer feedback: A case study with Turkish pre-service English teachers. Issues in Educational Research, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, J.
    (2018) Negotiations and criticisms in L2 peer review sessions. Modern English Education, , –. 10.18095/meeso.2018.19.4.59
     https://doi.org/10.18095/meeso.2018.19.4.59 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lin, G.
    (2017) Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system. Computers & Education, , –. 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010 [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, P., & You, X.
    (2019) Metapragmatic comments in web-based intercultural peer evaluation. Intercultural Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1515/ip‑2019‑0003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0003 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lu, R., & Bol, L.
    (2007) A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ly, A.
    (2016) Internal e-mail communication in the workplace: Is there an “east-west divide”?Intercultural Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1515/ip‑2016‑0002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2016-0002 [Google Scholar]
  31. Matsumoto, Y.
    (1988) Reexamination of the universality of face. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90003‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3 [Google Scholar]
  32. McGarrell, H.
    (2010) Native and non-native English speaking student teachers engage in peer feedback. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. McMahon, T.
    (2010) Peer feedback in an undergraduate programme: Using action research to overcome students’ reluctance to criticize. Educational Action Research, (), –. 10.1080/09650791003741814
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09650791003741814 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mercader, C., Ion, G., & Díaz-Vicario, A.
    (2020) Factors influencing students’ peer feedback uptake: Instructional design matters. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2020.1726283
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1726283 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nguyen, M.
    (2008) Criticizing in an L2: Pragmatic strategies used by Vietnamese EFL learners. Intercultural Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1515/IP.2008.003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2008.003 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ohbuchi, K., Hayashi, Y., & Imazai, K.
    (2000) Motivational analysis of avoidance in organizational conflicts: Japanese business employees’ concerns, strategies, and organizational attitudes. Psychologia, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Ohbuchi, K., Imazai, K., Sugawara, I., Tyler, T., & Lind, E.
    (1997) Goals and tactics in within- and between-culture conflicts. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Ohbuchi, K., & Takahashi, Y.
    (1994) Cultural styles of conflict management in Japanese and Americans: Passivity, covertness, and effectiveness of strategies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, , –. 10.1111/j.1559‑1816.1994.tb01553.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01553.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M.
    (2019) An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186 [Google Scholar]
  40. Park, S., & Howell, T.
    (2015) Implementation of a flipped classroom educational model in a predoctoral dental course. Journal of Dental Education, (), –. 10.1002/j.0022‑0337.2015.79.5.tb05916.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2015.79.5.tb05916.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Patchan, M., Schunn, C., & Clark, R.
    (2017) Accountability in peer assessment: Examining the effects of reviewing grades on peer ratings and peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/03075079.2017.1320374
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1320374 [Google Scholar]
  42. Patton, C.
    (2011) ‘Some kind of weird, evil experiment’: Student perceptions of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2011.563281
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.563281 [Google Scholar]
  43. Paulus, T.
    (1999) The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, (), –. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(99)80117‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9 [Google Scholar]
  44. Pizziconi, B.
    (2003) Re-examining politeness, face and the Japanese language. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00200‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00200-X [Google Scholar]
  45. Rollinson, P.
    (2005) Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, (), –. 10.1093/elt/cci003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci003 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sato, M.
    (2013) Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12035.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12035.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Stephan, E., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y.
    (2010) Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/a0016960
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016960 [Google Scholar]
  48. Topping, K.
    (2009) Peer assessment. Theory Into Practice, (), –. 10.1080/00405840802577569
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tracy, K., & Eisenberg, E.
    (1990) Giving criticism: A multiple goals case study. Research on Language and Social Interaction, , –. 10.1080/08351819009389332
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819009389332 [Google Scholar]
  50. Usami, M.
    (2002) Discourse politeness in Japanese conversation: Some implications for a universal theory of politeness. Hitsuji Shobo.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Van de Vliert, E., Ohbuchi, K., Van Rossum, B., Hayashi, Y., & Van der Vegt, G.
    (2004) Conglomerated contending by Japanese subordinates. International Journal of Conflict Management, , –. 10.1108/eb022912
     https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022912 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wakabayashi, R.
    (2008) The effect of peer feedback on EFL writing: Focusing on Japanese university students. OnCUE Journal, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Yalch, M., Vitale, E., & Ford, J.
    (2019) Benefits of peer review on students’ writing. Psychology Learning & Teaching, (), –. 10.1177/1475725719835070
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719835070 [Google Scholar]
  54. Yu, S.
    (2019) Learning from giving peer feedback on postgraduate theses: Voices from master’s students in the Macau EFL context. Assessing Writing, , –. 10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  55. Yucel, R., Bird, F., Young, J., & Blanksby, T.
    (2014) The road to self-assessment: Exemplar marking before peer review develops first-year students’ capacity to judge the quality of a scientific report. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/02602938.2014.880400
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.880400 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.22014.tu
Loading
The influence of closeness and anonymity on peer feedback
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.22014.tu
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.22014.tu
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.22014.tu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: closeness ; Japanese contexts ; L1 peer feedback ; anonymity ; critique ; discomfort ; praise

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error