1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Applied Pragmatics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Role of pragmatic instruction and individual differences variables in determining level of pragmatic competence
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of pragmatic instruction and several individual difference variables on pragmatic competence. The examined variables include cultural distance from the target language community, level of target language proficiency, length of residence in the target language country, and level of target language contact. Eighty undergraduate students from diverse backgrounds enrolled at a university in Japan participated in the study. Data collection instruments comprised a Japanese pragmatic test and a background questionnaire assessing participants’ country of origin, Japanese proficiency level, length of residence in Japan, and level of contact with Japanese speakers. Employing a one-group pre-test–post-test experimental design, the study administered the pragmatic test and background questionnaire to all participants at the beginning of the academic year. Throughout the academic year, participants received regular Japanese instruction with an emphasis on pragmatics. Towards the end of the academic year, the same pragmatic test was re-administered to 22 participants. Paired samples t-test analysis revealed a significant improvement in pragmatic competence following pragmatic instruction. Additionally, multiple regression analysis identified language proficiency, cultural distance, and language contact as influential factors in pragmatic competence development, ranked in descending order of importance.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ap.23008.raf
2026-03-13
2026-04-21

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ap.23008.raf
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alptekin, C.
    (2002) Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, (), –. 10.1093/elt/56.1.57
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.1.57 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bachman, L. F.
    (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (2009) Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00525.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00525.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z.
    (1998) Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3587583
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, H. D.
    (1994) Principles of language learning and teaching (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall Regents.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen, J.
    (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Culhane, S. F.
    (2004) An intercultural interaction model: Acculturation attitudes in second language acquisition. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. DuFon, M., & Churchill, E.
    (2006) Language learners in study abroad contexts. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853598531
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598531 [Google Scholar]
  9. Erlam, R.
    (2005) Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1191/1362168805lr161oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr161oa [Google Scholar]
  10. Farashaiyan, A., & Tan, K. H.
    (2012) On the relationship between pragmatic knowledge and language proficiency among Iranian male and female undergraduate EFL learners. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Freed, B.
    (1998) An overview of issues and research in language learning in a study abroad setting. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, , –. 10.36366/frontiers.v4i1.62
     https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v4i1.62 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fukuya, Y. J., & Martinez-Flor, A.
    (2008) The interactive effects of pragmatic-eliciting tasks and pragmatic instruction. Foreign Language Annals, (), –. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2008.tb03308.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03308.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Ghobadi, A., & Fahim, M.
    (2009) The effect of explicit teaching of English “thanking formulas” on Iranian EFL intermediate level students at English language institutes. System, (), –. 10.1016/j.system.2009.02.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.02.010 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B.
    (2017) Statistics for the behavioral sciences (10th ed.). Cengage Learning Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Guilloteaux, M. J., & Dörnyei, Z.
    (2008) Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00207.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00207.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Hofstede, G.
    (2001) Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. House, J.
    (2006) Text and context in translation. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.021
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.021 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N.
    (2021) How languages are learned (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Long, M. H.
    (1983) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/4.2.126
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126 [Google Scholar]
  20. (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. InW. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.–). Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Matsumura, S.
    (2003) Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/24.4.465
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.465 [Google Scholar]
  22. Nguyen, T. T. M., Pham, T. H., & Pham, M. T.
    (2012) The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Pallant, J.
    (2020) SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Pearson, L.
    (2001) Pragmatics in foreign language teaching: The effects of instruction on L2 learners’ acquisition of Spanish expressions of gratitude, apologies, and directives [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Texas, Austin.
  25. Peterson, E., & Coltrane, B.
    (2003) Culture in second language teaching (EDO-FL-03-09). ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Pienemann, M.
    (1999) Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.15
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2003) Language processing capacity. InC. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.–). Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch20
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch20 [Google Scholar]
  28. Rafieyan, V., Orang, M., Bijami, M., Sharafi-Nejad, M., & Lin, S. E.
    (2014) Language learners’ acculturation attitudes. English Language Teaching, (), –. 10.5539/elt.v7n1p114
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n1p114 [Google Scholar]
  29. Rafieyan, V., Sharafi-Nejad, M., Khavari, Z., Lin, S. E., & Abdul-Rashid, M.
    (2014) Pragmatic comprehension development through telecollaboration. English Language Teaching, (), –. 10.5539/elt.v7n2p11
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n2p11 [Google Scholar]
  30. Rafieyan, V.
    (2016a) Effect of cultural distance on pragmatic comprehension and production. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, (), –. 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.4p.25
     https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.4p.25 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2016b) Relationship between cultural intelligence and production of conventional expressions. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Rafieyan, V., Mahmoudi, E., & Adlina, A. S.
    (2016) Relationship between attitude toward cultural instruction and translation of culture-bound texts. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Ran, L.
    (2007) The relationship between linguistic proficiency and pragmatic ability. US-China Foreign Language, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Ranta, L.
    (2002) The role of learners’ language analytic ability in the communicative classroom. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.2.11ran
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.2.11ran [Google Scholar]
  35. Safont-Jorda, M. P.
    (2005) Third language learners: Pragmatic production and awareness. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853598043
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598043 [Google Scholar]
  36. Sagdic, A.
    (2021) Comprehending implied meaning: The combined effects of L2 proficiency, length of residence, and interaction. Applied Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1075/ap.19008.sag
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.19008.sag [Google Scholar]
  37. Schmidt, R., Boraie, D., & Kassabgy, O.
    (1996) Foreign language motivation: Internal structure and external connections. InR. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning motivation: Pathways to the new century (Technical report #11) (pp.–). University of Hawaiʻi, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Schmidt, R., & Watanabe, Y.
    (2001) Motivation, strategy use, and pedagogical preferences in foreign language learning. InZ. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (Technical report #23) (pp.–). University of Hawaiʻi, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B.
    (2004) Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263104262027
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262027 [Google Scholar]
  40. Taguchi, N.
    (2007) Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, , –. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00061.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00061.x [Google Scholar]
  41. (2008a) Cognition, language contact, and the development of pragmatic comprehension in a study-abroad context. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2007.00434.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00434.x [Google Scholar]
  42. (2008b) The role of learning environment in the development of pragmatic comprehension: A comparison of gains between EFL and ESL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263108080716
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080716 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2008c) Pragmatic comprehension in Japanese as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2008.00787.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00787.x [Google Scholar]
  44. (2013) Production of routines in L2 English: Effect of proficiency and study-abroad experience. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2013.01.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  45. Takahashi, S.
    (2005) Pragmalinguistic awareness: Is it related to motivation and proficiency?Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amh040
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh040 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2015) The effect of learner profiles on pragmalinguistic awareness and learning. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  47. Takimoto, M.
    (2012) Metapragmatic discussion in interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  48. Thomas, J.
    (1983) Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/4.2.91
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91 [Google Scholar]
  49. (1995) Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Ulbegi, E.
    (2009) The effects of implicit vs. explicit instruction on pragmatic development: Teaching polite refusals in English. Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Waninge, F., Dörnyei, Z., & De Bot, K.
    (2014) Motivational dynamics in language learning: Change, stability, and context. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12118
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12118 [Google Scholar]
  52. Ward, C., & Kennedy, A.
    (1999) The measurement of sociocultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, (), –. 10.1016/S0147‑1767(99)00014‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00014-0 [Google Scholar]
  53. Xiao, F., Taguchi, N., & Li, S.
    (2018) Effects of proficiency subskills on pragmatic development in L2 Chinese study abroad. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263118000128
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000128 [Google Scholar]
  54. Xu, W., Case, R., & Wang, Y.
    (2009) Pragmatic and grammatical competence, length of residence, and overall L2 proficiency. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2008.09.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.09.007 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.23008.raf
Loading
Role of pragmatic instruction and individual differences variables in determining level of pragmatic competence
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.23008.raf
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.23008.raf
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.23008.raf
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: pragmatic competence ; Japanese as a Foreign Language ; pragmatic instruction ; Individual differences

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error