1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Applied Pragmatics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Role exchange as an interactional practice to maintain progressivity in paired role-play interactional competence assessment tasks
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Assessing interactional competence (IC) in second/additional/foreign languages (L2) is increasingly becoming a primary construct to examine the interactional ability of language learners, which calls for assessment contexts that provide opportunities for mutually managing interactions. This study focuses on paired role-play tasks as the assessment context and investigates the systematic methods deployed by L2 learners to collaboratively accomplish the progressivity of task-oriented assessment conversations. Using Multimodal Conversation Analysis as the research methodology, we examine video-recorded paired role-play interactions and specifically deal with how L2 learners topicalize the instructed social actions and engage in role-exchange to ensure progressivity. Relatedly, the findings show that the participants skilfully switch their pre-assigned roles when they identify or pre-empt troubles in progressivity, which, in return, enables them to move the assessment task and talk-in-interaction forward, thus bearing relevance for a situated understanding of the participants’ displays of IC. The findings bring new insights into L2 IC assessment.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ap.23014.doy
2026-05-26
2026-06-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ap.23014.doy
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C.
    (2012) Proficiency and sequential organization of L2 requests. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amr031
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr031 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bachman, L. F.
    (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
    (1996) Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests (Vol.). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Balaman, U.
    (2018) Task-induced development of hinting behaviors in online task-oriented L2 interaction. Language Learning & Technology, (), –. 10.64152/10125/44640
     https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44640 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2023) Conversation analytic language teacher education in digital spaces. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑19127‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19127-5 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2025) A longitudinal case study of L2 interactional competence development in the ELT classroom: Teachability and learnability of L2 interactional practices. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 10.1111/ijal.12765
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12765 [Google Scholar]
  7. Balaman, U., & Can Daşkın, N.
    (2019) A series of conversation analysis based pedagogical activities for increasing interactional awareness. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Balaman, U., & Sert, O.
    (2017) Development of L2 interactional resources for online collaborative task accomplishment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, (), –. 10.1080/09588221.2017.1334667
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1334667 [Google Scholar]
  9. Breen, M.
    (1989) The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. InR. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524520.014
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524520.014 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brooks, L.
    (2009) Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co-constructing a better performance. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532209104666
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104666 [Google Scholar]
  11. Burch, A. R., & Kley, K.
    (2020) Assessing Interactional Competence: The role of intersubjectivity in a paired-speaking assessment task. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, (), –. 10.58379/VKYG7791
     https://doi.org/10.58379/VKYG7791 [Google Scholar]
  12. Canale, M., & Swain, M.
    (1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/1.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. A.
    (1994) Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. InJ. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp.–). Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Crookall, D., & Saunders, D.
    (1989) Communication and Simulation: From Two Fields to One Theme. Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dooly, M.
    (2011) Divergent perceptions of telecollaborative language learning tasks: Task-as-workplan vs. task-as-process. Language Learning & Technology, (), –. 10.64152/10125/44252
     https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44252 [Google Scholar]
  16. Drew, P.
    (1984) “Speakers’ reportings in invitation sequences.” InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Eskildsen, S. W., & Majlesi, A. R.
    (2018) Learnables and teachables in second language talk: Advancing a social reconceptualization of central SLA tenets. Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12462
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12462 [Google Scholar]
  18. Firth, A., & Wagner, J.
    (1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1997.tb05480.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Galaczi, E. D.
    (2008) Peer–peer interaction in a speaking test: The case of the first certificate in English examination. Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434300801934702
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300801934702 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2014) Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests?Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amt017
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt017 [Google Scholar]
  21. Galaczi, E., & Taylor, L.
    (2018) Interactional competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434303.2018.1453816
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1453816 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gan, Z.
    (2010) Interaction in group oral assessment: A case study of higher- and lower-scoring students. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532210364049
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210364049 [Google Scholar]
  23. Grabowski, K.
    (2013) Investigating the construct validity of a role-play test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge at multiple proficiency levels. InS. J. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp.–). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137003522_6
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003522_6 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hall, J. K.
    (2023) Challenges of assessing interactional competence. Applied Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1075/ap.00015.hal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00015.hal [Google Scholar]
  25. Hall, J. K., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2011) L2 interactional competence and development. InJ. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp.–). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847694072
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847694072 [Google Scholar]
  26. Havadar, E. E., & Balaman, U.
    (2024) Preliminaries in paired role play L2 interactional competence assessment tasks. Classroom Discourse, (), –. 10.1080/19463014.2023.2240898
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2023.2240898 [Google Scholar]
  27. He, A. W., & Young, R.
    (1998) Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. InR. Young & W. He Agnes, (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.14.02he
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.14.02he [Google Scholar]
  28. Heath, C., & Luff, P.
    (2012) Embodied action and organizational activity. The handbook of conversation analysis, –. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch14
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch14 [Google Scholar]
  29. Heritage, J.
    (2007) Intersubjectivity and progressivity in references to persons (and places). InN. Enfield (Ed.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486746.012
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486746.012 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hırçın-Çoban, M., & Çimenli, B.
    (2023) Collaborative turn construction in paired speaking tests across different proficiency levels. Classroom Discourse, (), –. 10.1080/19463014.2022.2090397
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2022.2090397 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hırçın Çoban, M., & Sert, O.
    (2020) Resolving interactional troubles and maintaining progressivity in paired speaking assessment in an EFL context. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hosoda, Y., & Aline, D.
    (2013) Two preferences in question–answer sequences in language classroom context. Classroom Discourse, (), –. 10.1080/19463014.2013.783497
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2013.783497 [Google Scholar]
  33. Huth, T.
    (2010) Can talk be inconsequential? Social and interactional aspects of elicited second-language interaction. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2010.01092.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01092.x [Google Scholar]
  34. (2020) Testing interactional competence: Patterned yet dynamic aspects of L2 interaction. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, (), –. 10.58379/COTX7322
     https://doi.org/10.58379/COTX7322 [Google Scholar]
  35. Huth, T., & Betz, E.
    (2019) Testing interactional competence in second language classrooms: Goals, formats and caveats. InM. R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and Testing L2 Interactional Competence (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315177021‑13
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177021-13 [Google Scholar]
  36. Huth, T., Betz, E., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C.
    (2019) Rethinking language teacher training: Steps for making talk-in-interaction research accessible to practitioners. Classroom Discourse, (), –. 10.1080/19463014.2019.1570529
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1570529 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hymes, D.
    (1972) On communicative competence. InJ. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp.–). Penguin.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T. F., & O’Hagan, S.
    (2008) Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct?Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amm017
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm017 [Google Scholar]
  39. Jefferson, G.
    (1988) On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, (), –. 10.2307/800595
     https://doi.org/10.2307/800595 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InG. H. Lerner (Ed). Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  41. (2015) Talking about troubles in conversation. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Kasper, G.
    (2013) Managing task uptake in oral proficiency interviews. InS. J. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp.–). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137003522_10
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003522_10 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R.
    (2002) Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Kasper, G., & Ross, S. J.
    (2013) Assessing second language pragmatics: An overview and introductions. InS. J. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp.–). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137003522_1
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003522_1 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kasper, G., & Youn, S. J.
    (2018) Transforming instruction to activity: Roleplay in language assessment. Applied Linguistics Review, (), –. 10.1515/applirev‑2017‑0020
     https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0020 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P.
    (2014) The putative preference for offers over request. InP. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.26.04ken
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.26.04ken [Google Scholar]
  47. Kley, K.
    (2019) What counts as evidence for interactional competence? Developing rating criteria for a German classroom-based paired speaking test. InM. R. Salaberry & S. Kunit (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315177021‑12
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177021-12 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kot Artunç, E., & Ortaçtepe Hart, D.
    (2020) Interactional competence in paired speaking tests: A study on proficiency-based pairings. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2019.102194
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102194 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kramsch, C.
    (1986) From language proficiency to interactional competence. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1986.tb05291.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05291.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Lam, D.
    (2018) What counts as “responding”? Contingency on previous speaker contribution as a feature of interactional competence. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532218758126
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758126 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lam, D. M., Galaczi, E., Nakatsuhara, F., & May, L.
    (2023) Assessing interactional competence: Exploring ratability challenges. Applied Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1075/ap.00014.lam
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00014.lam [Google Scholar]
  52. May, L. A.
    (2011) Interactional competence in a paired speaking test: Features salient to raters. Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434303.2011.565845
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.565845 [Google Scholar]
  53. McNamara, T. F.
    (1997) ‘Interaction’ in second language performance assessment: Whose performance?. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/18.4.446
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.4.446 [Google Scholar]
  54. Mondada, L.
    (2018) Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2019) Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016 [Google Scholar]
  56. Nanbu, Z., & Greer, T.
    (2023) Creating obstacles to progressivity: Task expansion in second language role-plays. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/tesq.3197
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3197 [Google Scholar]
  57. Okada, Y.
    (2010) Role-play in oral proficiency interviews: Interactive footing and interactional competencies. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  58. Okada, Y., & Greer, T.
    (2013) Pursuing a relevant response in oral proficiency interview role plays. InS. J. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp.–). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137003522_11
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003522_11 [Google Scholar]
  59. Richards, J. C.
    (1985) Conversational competence through role play activities. RELC journal, (), –. 10.1177/003368828501600107
     https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828501600107 [Google Scholar]
  60. Roever, C., & Kasper, G.
    (2018) Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532218758128
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758128 [Google Scholar]
  61. Ross, S.
    (2018) Listener response as a facet of interactional competence. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532218758125
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758125 [Google Scholar]
  62. Sacks, H.
    (1992) Lectures on conversation. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A.
    (2007) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. InN. Enfield (Ed.), Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486746.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486746.003 [Google Scholar]
  64. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, (), –. 10.2307/412243
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  65. Sandlund, E., & Greer, T.
    (2020) How do raters understand rubrics for assessing L2 interactional engagement? A comparative study of CA-and non-CA-formulated performance descriptors. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, (), –. 10.58379/JCIW3943
     https://doi.org/10.58379/JCIW3943 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sandlund, E., Sundqvist, P., & Nyroos, L.
    (2016) Testing L2 talk: A review of empirical studies on second-language oral proficiency testing. Language and Linguistics Compass, (), –. 10.1111/lnc3.12174
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12174 [Google Scholar]
  67. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  68. Schirm, S., Uskokovic, B., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C.
    (2023) The competence in little words: Response patterns in German L2 interaction. Applied Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1075/ap.00010.sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00010.sch [Google Scholar]
  69. Seedhouse, P.
    (2005) “Task” as research construct. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00314.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00314.x [Google Scholar]
  70. Sert, O.
    (2013) ‘Epistemic status check’ as an interactional phenomenon in instructed learning settings. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  71. (2015) Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748692651
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748692651 [Google Scholar]
  72. Sert, O., & Jacknick, C.
    (2015) Student smiles and the negotiation of epistemics in L2 classrooms. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  73. Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T.
    (2013) The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001 [Google Scholar]
  74. Skogmyr Marian, K., & Balaman, U.
    (2018) Second language interactional competence and its development: An overview of conversation analytic research on interactional change over time. Language and Linguistics Compass, (), Article 12285. 10.1111/lnc3.12285
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12285 [Google Scholar]
  75. Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D.
    (2006) A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in society, (), –. 10.1017/S0047404506060179
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060179 [Google Scholar]
  76. ten Have, P.
    (2007) Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). SAGE. 10.4135/9781849208895
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895 [Google Scholar]
  77. Uyar, G., & Balaman, U.
    (2024) The role of gazing behaviors in navigating paired role-play ınteractional competence assessment tasks. Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434303.2024.2375651
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2024.2375651 [Google Scholar]
  78. Walters, F. S.
    (2007) A conversation-analytic hermeneutic rating protocol to assess L2 oral pragmatic competence. Language Testing(), –. 10.1177/0265532207076362
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207076362 [Google Scholar]
  79. (2013) Interfaces between a discourse completion test and a conversation analysis-informed test of L2 pragmatic competence. InS. J. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp.–). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137003522_7
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003522_7 [Google Scholar]
  80. Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z.
    (2020) Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429488023
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429488023 [Google Scholar]
  81. Youn, S. J.
    (2015) Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532214557113
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214557113 [Google Scholar]
  82. (2020a) Pragmatic variables in role-play design for the context validity of assessing interactional competence. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, (), –. 10.58379/CZPW6475
     https://doi.org/10.58379/CZPW6475 [Google Scholar]
  83. (2020b) Managing proposal sequences in role-play assessment: Validity evidence of interactional competence across levels. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532219860077
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219860077 [Google Scholar]
  84. (2023) Grammar as validity evidence for assessing L2 interactional competence: The case of requests in role-play interaction. Applied Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1075/ap.00012.you
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00012.you [Google Scholar]
  85. Young, R. F.
    (2011) Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. InR. Young & A. W. He (Eds.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol., pp.–). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.23014.doy
Loading
Role exchange as an interactional practice to maintain progressivity in paired role-play interactional competence assessment tasks
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.23014.doy
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.23014.doy
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.23014.doy
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: interactional competence ; progressivity ; assessment ; conversation analysis ; role play

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error