1887
image of Impact of graduated versus explicit-only feedback in a pragmatics-focused computerized dynamic assessment of Japanese
learners’ L2 email writing
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study investigates the use of a pragmatics-focused computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA) of request-based L2 English email writing among Japanese university learners of English. The C-DA administers four email tasks to learners, automatically identifies perceived instances of pragmatic inappropriateness in texts and provides feedback, based on learner corpus perception data. The study compares the C-DA’s effectiveness in promoting learning among three participant groups: a group received feedback based on the concept of the zone of proximal development (ZPD); an group received explicit feedback, and a control group did not receive feedback. The C-DA was administered twice, with a two-week delay between administrations. Both treatment groups showed evidence of development to a greater extent than the control both within a session and between sessions in terms of openings, closings and modification strategies. Comparing treatment groups, the graduated group responded more to feedback within a session for openings and closings, but not for modification strategies. Between sessions, there was no difference between treatment groups; however, across the entirety of the study, the graduated feedback group responded significantly more to feedback. Findings provide support for computerized approaches to L2 email writing feedback, and for approaches sensitive to a learner’s ZPD.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ap.23018.nic
2026-04-17
2026-05-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P.
    (1994) Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, , –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1994.tb02064.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blum-kulka, S., & Olshtain, E.
    (1984) Requests and apologies: a cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/5.3.196
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bou-Franch, P.
    (2011) Openings and closings in Spanish email conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pederson, O.
    (2013) Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, (), –. 10.1177/0049124113500475
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Y.
    (2015) Developing Chinese EFL learners’ email literacy through requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  8. Economidou-Kogetsidis, M.
    (2011) “Please answer me as soon as possible”: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2015) Teaching email politeness in the EFL/ESL classroom. ELT Journal, (), –. 10.1093/elt/ccv031
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv031 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2016) Variation in evaluations of the (im)politeness of emails from L2 learners and perceptions of the personality of their senders. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Economidou-Kogetsidis, M., Woodfield, H., & Savvidou, C.
    (2020) Non-native EFL teachers’ email production and perceptions of e-(im)politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, (), –. 10.1515/pr‑2020‑0046
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2020-0046 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hendriks, B., van Meurs, F., & Kakisina, B.
    (2023) The effects of L1 and L2 writers’ varying politeness modification in English emails on L1 and L2 readers. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hudson, T., Detmer, E., & Brown, J. D.
    (1995) Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical Report 7). University of Hawai‘i.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A.
    (2022) Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where languages and culture meet (2nd ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M.
    (2004) Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872
    https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lazarescu, R. C.
    (2013) “Can you upload as soon as you can please?” A study of university student requests by e-mail in English Medium Instruction [Master dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid].
  17. Lenth, R. V.
    (2023) “emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means,” R package version 1.8.7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
  18. Lidz, C., & Gindis, B.
    (2003) Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. InA. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511840975.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840975.007 [Google Scholar]
  19. Nguyen, T., Do, T., Nguyen, A., & Pham, T.
    (2015) Teaching email requests in the academic context: a focus on the role of corrective feedback. Language Awareness, (), –. 10.1080/09658416.2015.1010543
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1010543 [Google Scholar]
  20. Nguyen, T.
    (2018) Pragmatic development in the instructed context. Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1075/prag.00007.ngu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.00007.ngu [Google Scholar]
  21. Nguyen, T. T. M., Do, T. T. H., Pham, T. T. T., & Nguyen, T. A.
    (2019) The effects of corrective feedback with and without revision on enhancing L2 pragmatic performance. Applied Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1075/ap.00001.min
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00001.min [Google Scholar]
  22. Nguyen, M. T. T., Renandya, W., Pham, T. T. T., & Pham, H. T.
    (2024) Learning how to write socially appropriate emails through textbooks: An evaluation of international English textbooks. TEFLIN Journal: A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, (), –. 10.15639/teflinjournal.v35i1/66‑89
    https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v35i1/66-89 [Google Scholar]
  23. Nicholas, A.
    (2020) Dynamic assessment and requesting: Assessing the development of Japanese EFL learners’ oral requesting performance interactively. Intercultural Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1515/ip‑2020‑5002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-5002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Nicholas, A., Blake, J., Mozgovoy, M., & Perkins, J.
    (2023) Investigating pragmatic failure in L2 English email writing among Japanese university EFL learners. Register Studies, (), –. 10.1075/rs.20016.nic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.20016.nic [Google Scholar]
  25. Nicholas, A., Blake, J., Perkins, J., and Mozgovoy, M.
    (2024) Evaluating the effectiveness of a computerised dynamic assessment of L2 English email requests. Computer Assisted Language Learning, –. 10.1080/09588221.2024.2374775
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2374775 [Google Scholar]
  26. Plonsky, L., & Zhuang, J.
    (2019) A meta-analysis of second language pragmatics instruction. InN. Taguchi (Ed.), Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp.–). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Poehner, M.
    (2008) Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Springer Science & Business Media. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑75775‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75775-9 [Google Scholar]
  28. Poehner, M., Zhang, J., & Lu, X.
    (2015) Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532214560390
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214560390 [Google Scholar]
  29. Qin, T., & van Compernolle, R. A.
    (2021) Computerized dynamic assessment of implicature comprehension in L2 Chinese. Language Learning & Technology, (), –. hdl.handle.net/10125/73433. 10.64152/10125/73433
    https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73433 [Google Scholar]
  30. Rau, D.-H., & Rau, G.
    (2016) Negotiating personal relationship through email terms of address. InY. Chen, D.-H. Rau, & G. Rau (Eds.), Email discourse among Chinese using English as a lingua franca (pp.–). Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑287‑888‑5_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-888-5_2 [Google Scholar]
  31. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2023) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ren, W., & Han, Z.
    (2016) The representation of pragmatic knowledge in recent ELT textbooks. ELT Journal, (), –. 10.1093/elt/ccw010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw010 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ren, W., Li, S., & Lü, X.
    (2023) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of second language pragmatics instruction. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amac055
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac055 [Google Scholar]
  34. Roever, C.
    (2022) Teaching and testing second language pragmatics and interaction: A practical guide. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Savić, M.
    (2018) Lecturer perceptions of im/politeness and in/appropriateness in student e-mail requests: A Norwegian perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  36. Taguchi, N.
    (2015) Instructed Pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, , –. 10.1017/S0261444814000263
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000263 [Google Scholar]
  37. Taguchi, N., & Roever, C.
    (2017) Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Takimoto, M.
    (2012) Assessing the effects of identical task repetition and task-type repetition on learners’ recognition and production of second language request downgraders. Intercultural Pragmatics, , –. 10.1515/ip‑2012‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2012-0004 [Google Scholar]
  39. Usó-Juan, E.
    (2021) Chapter 3. Long-term instructional effects on learners’ use of email request modifiers. InM. Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. Savić, & N. Halenko (Eds.), Email Pragmatics and Second language Learners (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.328.03uso
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.328.03uso [Google Scholar]
  40. (2022) Exploring the role of strategy instruction on learners’ ability to write authentic email requests to faculty. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/13621688211066997
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211066997 [Google Scholar]
  41. van Compernolle, R. A., & Kinginger, C.
    (2013) Promoting metapragmatic development through assessment in the zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/1362168813482917
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482917 [Google Scholar]
  42. Vygotsky, L. S.
    (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Yu, L., & Poehner, M. E.
    (2023) Developing L2 writing abilities through an instructional enrichment programme informed by dynamic assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, , Article 101013. 10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101013 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.23018.nic
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ap.23018.nic
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error