1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2215-1354
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1362
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

With 20,000 speakers across Northern Australia, Australian Kriol is well known to exhibit geographic variation but this has never been systematically studied. This article stems from the first dialectological study of Kriol, focusing on the eastern portion of the Kriol-speaking area. It analyses variation in forms of the Kriol reflexive, which is derived from the English form ‘myself/meself’ but is invariant for person and number. The analysis utilises random forests modelling to analyse the importance of factors, a new method available to variation studies that is particularly useful when applied to small languages with small datasets. With geography confirmed as the major factor accounting for variation, areal patterns showing variation in lexical form of the reflexive, the medial consonant, the final vowel and the final consonant are considered. This study also documents new variants of the Kriol reflexive and incorporates perceptual dialectology, combining to better inform classifications of Kriol dialects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.00005.dic
2020-03-02
2020-04-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, Brett, Bundgaard-Nielsen, Rikke, & Graetzer, Simone
    (2014) The obstruent inventory of Roper Kriol. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34(3), 307–344. 10.1080/07268602.2014.898222
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2014.898222 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baron, Naomi
    (2012) The impact of electronically-mediated communication on language standards and style. InTerttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Traugott (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English (pp.329–340). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Batchelor, Thomas
    (2017) Making sense of synchronic variation: Semantic and phonological factors in transitivity marking in Barunga Kriol. Unpublished honours thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney.
  4. Biewer, Carolin
    (2015) South Pacific Englishes: A sociolinguistic and morphosyntactic profile of Fiji English, Samoan English and Cook Islands English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/veaw.g52
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g52 [Google Scholar]
  5. Breiman, Leo
    (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. 10.1023/A:1010933404324
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bundgaard-Nielsen, Rikke, & Baker, Brett
    (2016) Fact or furphy? The continuum in Kriol. InFelicity Meakins & Carmel O’Shannessy (Eds.), Loss and renewal: Australian languages since contact (pp.177–216). Boston/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614518792‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518792-013 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dickson, Greg
    (2015) Marra and Kriol: The loss and maintenance of knowledge across a language shift boundary. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra.
  8. Dickson, Greg, & Hautsalo, Klaudia
    (2018, February). Along a dialect chain: Variation in the locational preposition in Australian Kriol. Paper presented atNew Ways of Analysing Variation- Asia Pacific 5, University of Queensland, Brisbane.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Disbray, Samantha
    (2009) More than one way to catch a frog: Children’s discourse in a language contact setting. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
  10. Grama, James
    (2015) Variation and change in Hawai’i creole vowels. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Hawai’iatManoa.
  11. Harris, John
    (1986) Northern territory pidgins and the origin of Kriol. Pacific Linguistics Series C. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heath, Jeffrey
    (1984) Functional grammar of Nunggubuyu. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hudson, Joyce
    (1985) Grammatical and semantic aspects of Fitzroy Valley Kriol. Work papers of SIL-AAB Series A. Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Australian Aborigines Branch.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kursa, Miron B., Jankowski, Aleksander, & Rudnicki, Witold R.
    (2010) Boruta–a system for feature selection. Fundamenta Informaticae, 101(4), 271–285. 10.3233/FI‑2010‑288
    https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2010-288 [Google Scholar]
  15. Living Archive of Aboriginal Languages (2018) Retrieved fromlaal.cdu.edu.au/
  16. Mansfield, John, & Stanford, James
    (2017) Documenting sociolinguistic variation in lesser-studied indigenous communities: Challenges and practical solutions. Language Documentation and Conservation, 13, 116–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Meakins, Felicity
    (2011) Case-marking in contact: The development and function of case morphology in Gurindji Kriol, volume39. Amsterdam/Phildelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cll.39
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.39 [Google Scholar]
  18. Meehan, Dorothy
    (2017) Starting out at Bamyili: Factors specific to the development of the Kriol Program. InBrian Devlin, Samantha Disbray, & Nancy Devlin (Eds.), History of bilingual education in the Northern Territory: People, programs and policies (pp.61–71). Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑2078‑0_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2078-0_6 [Google Scholar]
  19. Meyerhoff, Miriam
    (1996) Transitive marking in contact Englishes. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 16, 57–80. 10.1080/07268609608599531
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268609608599531 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2000) Constraints on null subjects in Bislama (Vanuatu): Social and linguistics factors. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2009) Animacy in Bislama? Using quantitative methods to evaluate transfer of a substrate feature. InJames N. Stanford & Dennis R. Preston (Eds.), Variation in indigenous minority languages (pp.369–396). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/impact.25.19mey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.25.19mey [Google Scholar]
  22. (2011) Introducing sociolinguistics (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meyerhoff, Miriam, & Walker, James
    (2012) Grammatical variation in Bequia (St Vincent and the Grenadines). Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 27(2), 209–234. 10.1075/jpcl.27.2.01mey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.27.2.01mey [Google Scholar]
  24. Munro, Jennifer
    (2000) Kriol on the move: A case of language spread and shift in Northern Australia. InJeff Siegel (Ed.), Processes of language contact. Studies from Australia and the South Pacific (pp.245–270). Montreal: Fides.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2004) Substrate language influence in Kriol: The application of transfer constraints to language contact in Northern Australia. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of New England, Armidale.
  26. Nicholls, Sophie
    (2009) Referring expressions and referential practice in Roper Kriol (Northern Territory, Australian). Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of New England, Armidale.
  27. O’Shannessy, Carmel
    (2015) Multilingual children increase language differentiation by indexing communities of practice. First Language, 35(4–5), 305–326. 10.1177/0142723715609227
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723715609227 [Google Scholar]
  28. Orton, Harold, Sanderson, Stewart, & Widdowson, John
    (1978) The linguistic atlas of England. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Patrick, Peter
    (1999) Urban Jamaican creole: Variation in the mesolect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g17 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ponsonnet, Maïa
    (2010) “Brainwash from English”?: Barunga Kriol speakers’ views on their own language. Anthropological Linguistics, 52(2), 160–183. 10.1353/anl.2010.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2010.0010 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2016) Reflexive, reciprocal and emphatic functions in Barunga Kriol. InCarmel O’Shannessy & Felicity Meakins (Eds.), Loss and renewal: Australian languages since contact (pp.297–332). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614518792‑016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518792-016 [Google Scholar]
  32. Preston, Dennis R.
    (1996) Where the worst English is spoken. InEdgar. W. Schneider (Ed.), Focus on the USA (pp.297–360). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/veaw.g16.16pre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g16.16pre [Google Scholar]
  33. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rhydwen, Mari
    (1996) Writing on the backs of the Blacks. St. Lucia, Qld: University of Queensland Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Roberts, Tony
    (2005) Frontier justice: A history of the Gulf country to 1900. St. Lucia, Qld: University of Queensland Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. San Roque, Lila, Gawne, Lauren, Hoenigman, Darja, Miller, Julia Colleen, Rumsey, Alan, Spronck, Stef, Carroll, Alice, & Evans, Nicholas
    (2012) Getting the story straight: Language fieldwork using a narrative problem-solving task. Language Documentation and Conservation, 6, 135–174. Retrieved fromscholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/handle/10125/4504/sanroque.pdf?sequence
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sandefur, John
    (1979) An Australian creole in the Northern Territory: A description of Ngukurr-Bamyili dialects. Work papers of SIL-AAB : Series B v 3. Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Australian Aborigines Branch.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (1986) Kriol of North Australia: A language coming of age. Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Australian Aborigines Branch.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Satyanath, Shobha
    (1991) Variation and change: (daz) in Guyanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
  40. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    ([1916] 1983) Course in general linguistics. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Schneider, Ulrike
    (2014) Frequency, chunks and hesitations: A usage-based analysis of chunking in English. Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Schnell, Stefan, & Barth, Danielle
    (2018) Discourse motivations for pronominal and zero objects across registers in Vera’a. Language Variation and Change, 30(1), 51–81. 10.1017/S0954394518000054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394518000054 [Google Scholar]
  43. Schultze-Berndt, Eva, Meakins, Felicity, & Angelo, Denise
    (2013) Kriol. InSusanne Michaelis, Phillippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath, & Magnus Huber (Eds.), The survey of pidgin and creole languages: English-based and Dutch-based languages, volume1 (pp.241–251). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved fromapics-online.info/sources/1911
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sharpe, Margaret, & Sandefur, John
    (1976) The Creole language of the Katherine and Roper River areas, Northern Territory. InMichael Clyne (Ed.), Australia talks: Essays on the sociology of Australian immigrant and aboriginal languages (pp.63–77). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. SIL-IAAB
    SIL-IAAB (1986) Kriol dictionary: With Kriol to English and English to Kriol: First draft. Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Australian Aborigines and Islanders Branch.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Steffensen, Margaret
    (1979) Reduplication in Bamyili Creole. InPapers in Pidgin and Creole Linguistics No. 2, volumeA57 (pp.119–133). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Tagliamonte, Sali A., & Baayen, Harald R.
    (2012) Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change. 24(2), 135–178. 10.1017/S0954394512000129
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000129 [Google Scholar]
  48. To, Carol K. S., Mcleod, Sharynne, & Cheung, Pamela S. P.
    (2015) Phonetic variations and sound changes in Hong Kong Cantonese: Diachronic review, synchronic study and implications for speech sound assessment. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29(5), 333–353. 10.3109/02699206.2014.1003329
    https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2014.1003329 [Google Scholar]
  49. Walker, James
    (2014) Variation analysis. InRobert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (Eds.), Research methods in linguistics (pp.440–459). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139013734.023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013734.023 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.00005.dic
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.00005.dic
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error