Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1354
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1362
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Abstract (International Sign)

In contrast to sociolinguistic research on spoken languages, little attention has been paid to how signers employ variation as a resource to fashion social meaning. This study focuses on an extremely understudied social practice, that of sign language usage in Indonesia, and asks where one might look to find socially meaningful variables. Using spontaneous data from a corpus of BISINDO (Indonesian Sign Language), it blends methodologies from Labovian variationism and analytic practices from the ‘third wave’ with a discursive approach to investigate how four variable linguistic features are used to express social identities. These features occur at different levels of linguistic organisation, from the phonological to the lexical and the morphosyntactic, and point to identities along regional and ethnic lines, as well as hearing status. In applying third wave practices to sign languages, constructed action and mouthings in particular emerge as potent resources for signers to make social meaning.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Agha, Asif
    (2003) The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication, 23, 231–273. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00012‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0 [Google Scholar]
  2. Antaki, Charles, & Widdicombe, Sue
    (Eds.) (1998) Identities in talk. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    (1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (Michael Holquist, Ed., Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist, trans.). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertrand, Jacques
    (2003) Language policy and the promotion of national identity in Indonesia. InMichael E. Brown & Sumit Ganguly (Eds.), Fighting words: Language policy and ethnic relations in Asia (pp.263–290). London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bienvenu, Martina J.
    (1991) Can deaf people survive “deafness?” InMervin D. Garretson (Ed.), Perspectives on deafness: A deaf American monograph (pp.21–28). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bouchard, Denis, & Dubuisson, Colette
    (1995) Grammar, order and position of Wh-signs in Quebec Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 87, 99–139. 10.1353/sls.1995.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1995.0007 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boyes Braem, Penny, & Sutton-Spence, Rachel
    (Eds.) (2001) The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign languages. Hamburg: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik) [Indonesian Statistics Bureau]
    BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik) [Indonesian Statistics Bureau] (2019) Statistik Indonesia 2019 [Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2019]. Retrieved15 June, 2019, fromwww.bps.go.id
  9. Branson, Jan, & Miller, Don
    (2004) The cultural construction of linguistic incompetence through schooling: Deaf education and the transformation of the linguistic environment in Bali, Indonesia. Sign Language Studies, 5(1), 6–38. 10.1353/sls.2004.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2004.0021 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bristowe, Anthea, Oostendorp, Marcelyn, & Anthonissen, Christine
    (2014) Language and youth identity in a multilingual setting: A multimodal repertoire approach. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 32(2), 229–245. 10.2989/16073614.2014.992644
    https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2014.992644 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bucholtz, Mary
    (1996) Geek the girl: Language, femininity, and female nerds. InNatasha Warner, Jocelyn Ahlers, Leela Bilmes, Monica Oliver, Suzenne Wertheim, & Melinda Chen (Eds.), Gender and belief systems: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Conference on Women and Language (pp.119–131). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira
    (2004) Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society, 33(4), 469–515. 10.1017/S0047404504334020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404504334020 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cameron, Deborah
    (2000) Styling the worker: Gender and the commodification of language in the globalized service economy. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(3), 323–347. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00119
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00119 [Google Scholar]
  14. Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn, Eckert, Penelope, Mendoza-Denton, Norma, & Moore, Emma
    (2006) The elements of style. Poster, NWAV35, Ohio State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Copland, Fiona, & Creese, Angela
    (2015) Linguistic ethnography: Collecting, analysing and presenting data. London: Sage Publications Limited. 10.4135/9781473910607
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473910607 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cormier, Kearsy, Smith, Sandra, & Zwets, Martine
    (2013) Framing constructed action in British Sign Language narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 119–139. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  17. Coupland, Nikolas
    (2016) Introduction. InNikolas Coupland (Ed.) Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates (pp.1–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107449787.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449787.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Drager, Katie
    (2013) Experimental methods in sociolinguistics: Matched guise and identification tasks. InJanet Holmes & Kirk Hazen (Eds.), Research methods in sociolinguistics: A practical guide (pp.58–73). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Eckert, Penelope
    (2000) Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2008) Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00374.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x [Google Scholar]
  21. (2012) Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87–100. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑092611‑145828
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2019) Stylistic practice. Retrieved15 June, 2019, fromhttps://web.stanford.edu/~Eckert/csofp.html
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Eckert, Penelope, & Rickford, John R.
    (Eds.) (2001) Style and sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Edwards, John
    (2011) Challenges in the social life of language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230302204
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302204 [Google Scholar]
  25. Egbert, Maria M.
    (1997) Schisming: The collaborative transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(1), 1–51. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3001_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3001_1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Eichmann, Hanna
    (2008) “Hands off our language!” Deaf Sign Language Teachers’ perspectives on Sign Language standardisation. Doctoral dissertation, UCLAN.
  27. Errington, J. Joseph
    (1985) Language and social change in Java: Linguistic reflexes of modernization in a traditional royal polity. Athens: Ohio University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1998) Shifting languages: Interaction and identity in Javanese Indonesian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612480
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612480 [Google Scholar]
  29. Farrell, Emily J.
    (2008) Negotiating identity: Discourses of migration and belonging. Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University, Australia.
  30. Ferrara, Lindsay, & Johnston, Trevor
    (2014) Elaborating who’s what: A study of constructed action and clause structure in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34(2), 193–215. 10.1080/07268602.2014.887405
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2014.887405 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fontana, Sabina
    (2008) Mouth actions as gesture in sign language. Gesture, 8(1), 104–123. 10.1075/gest.8.1.08fon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.1.08fon [Google Scholar]
  32. Gardner-Chloros, Penelope
    (2009) Code-switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609787
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609787 [Google Scholar]
  33. Goebel, Zane
    (2007) Enregisterment and appropriation in Javanese-Indonesian bilingual talk. Language in Society, 36(4), 511–531. 10.1017/S004740450707042X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450707042X [Google Scholar]
  34. Grosjean, François
    (1982) Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gumperz, John J.
    (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hamid, M. Obaidul, & Jahan, Iffat
    (2015) Language, identity and social divides: Medium of instruction debates in Bangladeshi print media. Comparative Education Review, 59(1), 75–101. 10.1086/679192
    https://doi.org/10.1086/679192 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hodge, Gabrielle, & Ferrara, Lindsay
    (2013) Showing the story: Enactment as performance in Auslan narratives. InLauren Gawne & Jill Vaughan (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 44th Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society (pp.372–397). Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hohenberger, Annette, & Happ, Daniela
    (2001) The linguistic primacy of signs. InPenny Boyes-Braem & Rachel Sutton-Spence (Eds.), The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign languages (pp.153–190). Hamburg: Signum.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hou, Lynn Y-S.
    (2016) “Making hands”: Family sign languages in the San Juan Quiahije community. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
  40. Hou, Lynn Y-S., & Kusters, Annelies
    (2019) Sign languages. InKarin Tusting (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic ethnography (pp.340–355). Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315675824‑25
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315675824-25 [Google Scholar]
  41. Isma, Silva T. P.
    (2012) Signing varieties in Jakarta and Yogyakarta: Dialects or separate languages?Master’s thesis, CUHK, Hong Kong.
  42. Isma, Silva T. P., Bharoto, Adhi Kusumo, & Novitasari, Opy
    (2018) When local meets formal: Influence of deaf education on color signs variation in Indonesian Sign Language. Second Workshop on Language, Literature and Society for Education, Solo, Central Java. doi:  10.4108/eai.21‑12‑2018.2282747
    https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-12-2018.2282747 [Google Scholar]
  43. Jaworski, Adam, & Coupland, Nikolas
    (2005) Othering in gossip: ‘you go out you have a laugh and you can pull yeah okay but like…’ Language in Society, 34(5), 667–694. 10.1017/S0047404505050256
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050256 [Google Scholar]
  44. Johnson, Daniel Ezra
    (2009) Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 359–383. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00108.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Johnston, Trevor
    (1996) Function and medium in the forms of linguistic expression found in a sign language. InWilliam H. Edmondson & Ronnie B. Wilbur (Eds.), International review of sign linguistics, volume1, (pp.57–94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kusters, Annelies
    (2017) Gesture-based customer interactions: Deaf and hearing Mumbaikars’ multimodal and metrolingual practices. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 283–302. 10.1080/14790718.2017.1315811
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315811 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kusters, Annelies & Friedner, Michele
    (2015) Introduction: Deaf-same and difference in international deaf spaces and encounters. InMichele Friedner & Annelies Kusters (Eds.), It’s a small world: International deaf spaces and encounters, (pp.ix–xxix). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Labov, William
    (1994) Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors, volume1. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2001) Principles of linguistic change: External factors, volume2. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Ladd, Paddy
    (2003) Understanding deaf culture: In search of deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853595479
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595479 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lane, Harlan
    (2005) Ethnicity, ethics, and the Deaf-World. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(3), 291–310. 10.1093/deafed/eni030
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni030 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lewin, Donna, & Schembri, Adam
    (2011) Mouth gestures in British Sign Language: A case study of tongue protrusion in BSL narratives. Sign Language and Linguistics, 14(1), 94–114. 10.1075/sll.14.1.06lew
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.14.1.06lew [Google Scholar]
  53. Llamas, Carmen
    (2006) Shifting identities and orientations in a border town. InTope Omoniyi & Goodith White (Eds.), The sociolinguistics of identity, (pp.92–112). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, & Valli, Clayton
    (2001) Sociolinguistic variation in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612824
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612824 [Google Scholar]
  55. Lucas, Ceil, & Bayley, Robert
    (2016) Quantitative sociolinguistics and sign languages: Implications for sociolinguistic theory. InNikolas Coupland (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates (pp.349–367). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107449787.017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449787.017 [Google Scholar]
  56. Lutzenberger, Hannah
    (2017) Negation in Kata Kolok: Grammaticalization throughout three generations of signers. Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam.
  57. McCaskill, Carolyn, Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, & Hill, Joseph
    (2011) The hidden treasure of Black ASL: Its history and structure. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. McIlroy, Guy, & Storbeck, Claudine
    (2011) Development of deaf identity: An ethnographic study. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(4), 494–511. 10.1093/deafed/enr017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enr017 [Google Scholar]
  59. McKee, Rachel
    (2019) Motivation and innovation in indexing Māori identity in New Zealand Sign Language. Paper presented atSymposium on Sociolinguistic Variation in Signed and Spoken Languages of the Asia-Pacific Region, University of Central Lancashire, 12–13 July 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. McMahon, April M. S.
    (1994) Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166591
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166591 [Google Scholar]
  61. Metzger, Melanie
    (1995) Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. InCeil Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities (pp.255–271). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Mohammad, Abeer, & Vásquez, Camilla
    (2015) ‘Rachel’s not here’: Constructed dialogue in gossip. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(3), 351–371. 10.1111/josl.12125
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12125 [Google Scholar]
  63. Myers-Scotton, Carol
    (1993) Social motivations for codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Ochs, Elinor
    (2004) Narrative lessons. InAlessandro Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp.269–289). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Ochs, Elinor, & Capps, Lisa
    (2001) Living narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Padden, Carol A., & Humphries, Tom
    (2006) Inside deaf culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Palfreyman, Nick
    (2013) Form, function and the grammaticalisation of completive markers in the sign language varieties of Solo and Makassar.’ NUSA: Linguistic studies of languages in and around Indonesia. Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ILCAA), Tokyo.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. (2015) Sign language varieties of Indonesia: A linguistic and sociolinguistic investigation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Lancashire.
  69. (2016) Colour terms in Indonesian sign language varieties: A preliminary study. InUlrike Zeshan & Keiko Sagara (Eds.), Semantic fields in sign languages: Colour, kinship and quantification (pp.269–300). Berlin: De Gruyter and Lancaster: Ishara Press. 10.1515/9781501503429‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503429-008 [Google Scholar]
  70. (2019) Variation in Indonesian Sign Language: A typological and Sociolinguistic analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter and Lancaster: Ishara Press. 10.1515/9781501504822
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504822 [Google Scholar]
  71. (in press). Managing sign language data from fieldwork. InAndrea Berez-Kroeker, Bradley McDonnell, Eve Koller, & Lauren Collister Eds. The open handbook of linguistic data management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Open.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Robson, Stuart
    (2004) Welcome to Indonesian: A beginner’s survey of the language. North Clarendon: VT: Tuttle Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Schembri, Adam, & Johnston, Trevor
    (2013) Sociolinguistic variation and change in sign languages. InRobert Bayley, Richard Cameron, & Ceil Lucas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics (pp.503–524). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Schembri, Adam, McKee, David, McKee, Rachel, Pivac, Sara, Johnston, Trevor, & Goswell, Della
    (2009) Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change, 21(2), 193–231. 10.1017/S0954394509990081
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990081 [Google Scholar]
  75. Schilling-Estes, Natalie
    (2004) Constructing ethnicity in interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(2), 163–195. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2004.00257.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00257.x [Google Scholar]
  76. Silverstein, Michael
    (2003) Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication, 23, 193–229. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
  77. Sloetjes, Han
    (2014) ELAN: Multimedia annotation application. InJacques Durand, Ulrike Gut, and Gjert Kristoffersen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corpus phonology (pp.305–320). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Sneddon, James N.
    (2003) The Indonesian language: Its history and role in modern society. Sydney: UNSW Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Tagliamonte, Sali A.
    (2012) Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Tannen, Deborah
    (1989) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Taub, Sarah F.
    (2001) Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511509629
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509629 [Google Scholar]
  82. Vander Klok, Jozina
    (2012) Tense, aspect and modal markers in Paciran Javanese. Doctoral dissertation, York University, Montréal.
  83. Van Cleve, John Vickrey, & Crouch, Barry A.
    (1997) A place of their own: Creating the deaf community in America. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Wijaya, Laura Lesmana
    (2017) Role shifting in Jakarta Sign Language: Subject-constructed actions, reference sequence and reference function. Bachelor’s thesis, CUHK.
  85. Wortham, Stanton
    (2006) Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Zeshan, Ulrike
    (2001) Mouthing in Indopakistani Sign Language (IPSL): Regularities and variations. InPenny Boyes Braem & Rachel Sutton-Spence (Eds.), The hands are the head of the mouth (pp.247–271). Hamburg: Signum.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Zeshan, Ulrike, & Palfreyman, Nick
    (in press). Comparability of signed and spoken languages: Absolute and relative modality effects in cross-modal typology. InNicholas Evans Ed. Comparability [Special issue]. Linguistic Typology.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhang, Qing
    (2008) Rhotacization and the ‘Beijing smooth operator’: The social meaning of a linguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(2), 201–222. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00362.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00362.x [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): identity; Indonesian Sign Language; styles; third wave; variation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error