1887
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2215-1354
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1362
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Bybee et al. (1994) claimed that grammatical-types like past and future have similar paths of development cross-linguistically. Following another line of research, Poplack (2011) , Poplack and Tagliamonte (2000) and Walker et al. (2004) explored the grammaticalization of periphrastic ‘go-future’ in English, French, and Spanish from a variationist perspective and have come to the same conclusion. In this study we explore whether a new Persian future marker, MI_KHA: ‘want/will/going to’, which is gaining ground in this language, can be an instance of the grammatical-types mentioned above, and follows the same path of variation and change as that of English and French. Eight-hundred and one future-referring utterances were collected from natural conversations among Persian native speakers and subjected to variable rule analysis to discover the factors conditioning their use and variation. The findings suggest that the Persian MI_KHA: is not only conditioned by linguistic factors, it also most likely follows a path of development similar to English and French.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.16011.gha
2018-01-19
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmadi-Givi, Hasan , & Anvari, Hasan
    (1989) Dastur-e Zaban-e Farsi [Persian grammar]. Tehran: Fatemi publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bourdin, Philippe
    (2008) On the grammaticalization of ‘come’ and ‘go’ into markers of textual connectivity. In Lopez-Couso, Mara Jose , & Elena Seoane (Eds.), Rethinking grammaticalization: New perspectives (pp.37–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.76.05bou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.76.05bou [Google Scholar]
  3. Bybee, Joan L.
    (2003) Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp.602–624). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. doi: 10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bybee, Joan L. , & Pagliuca, William
    (1987) The evolution of future meaning. In Anna Giacalone Ramat , Onofrio Carruba , & Giuliano Bernini (Eds.), Papers from the 7th international conference on historical linguistics (pp.107–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.48.09byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.48.09byb [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan , Pagliuca, William , & Perkins, Revere D.
    (1991) Back to the future. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (pp.19–58). Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.2.04byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.04byb [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan L. , Perkins Revere, D. , & Pagliuca, William
    (1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Croft, William
    (2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. New York: Longman
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dahl, Osten
    (1985) Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Disney, Steve
    (2009) The grammaticalisation of ‘be going to’. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 63–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghafar Samar, Reza , & Yazdanmehr, Elham
    (2015) Tahlil-e Gooneh hay-e Vajgani-nahvi-e bayan-e ayandeh dar zaban-e farsi zir-e tasir-e avamel-e ejtemaai [The effect of social factors on lexical and syntactic variation of future marking in Persian]. Language and Linguistics, 8(16), 95–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ghomeshi, Jila
    (2001) Control and thematic agreement. Canadian Journal in Linguistics, 46(1–2), 9–40. doi: 10.1017/S0008413100017928
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100017928 [Google Scholar]
  12. Greenberg, Joseph Harold
    (Ed.) (1963) Universals of language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (1966) Language universals. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Haghshenas, Ali Mohammad , Samei, Hossein , Samai, Mehdi , & Tabatabai, Alaeddin
    (2008) Dastur-e Zaban-e Farsi [Persian Grammar]. Tehran: Ministry of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Heine, Bernd
    (1990) Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter. Paper presented at theSymposium on Explanation in Historical Linguistics, Milwaukee.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1993) Auxiliaries, cognitive forces, and grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Heine, Bernd (2003) Grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp.575–601). Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756393.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch18 [Google Scholar]
  18. Heine, Bernd , & Kuteva, Tania
    (2003) On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language, 27(3), 529–572. doi: 10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei [Google Scholar]
  19. Hilpert, Martin
    (2008) Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.7 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hojatollah Taleghani, Azita
    (2006) The interaction of modality, aspect and negation in Persian. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hopper, Paul J.
    (1991) On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (Eds.). Approaches to grammaticalization (pp.17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  22. Hopper, Paul J. , & Traugott, Elizabith C.
    (2003) Grammaticalization (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jahani, Carina
    (2008) Expressions of future in classical and modern new Persian. In Simin Karimi , Vida Samiian , & Donald Stilo (Eds.), Aspects of Iranian linguistics (pp.153–175). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kuteva, Tania
    (2001) Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lazard, Gilbert
    (1992) Grammar of contemporary Persian. ( Shirley Lyons , Trans.). Costa Mesa, California: Mazda.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mahootian, Sharzad
    (1999) Dastur-e zaban-e Farsi az didgah-e radeshenasi [Persian grammar: A typological approach]. ( Mehdi Samai , Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-e Markaz.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Naghzguy Kohan, Mehrdad
    (2011a) Chegoonegi-e shenasai-e mavared-e dastoory shodegi [How to recognize grammaticisized cases]. Journal of Language and Comparative Literature, 1(2), 149–165.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2011b) afal-e moin va namayesh nemood dar zaban-e farsi [Modal verbs and aspect marking in Persian]. Literary Research, 14, 93–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2012) Dastoory shodegi-e afal-e harakati dar zaban-e farsi [Grammaticalization of motion verbs in Persian]. In Qodsieh Rezvanian (Ed.), Proceeding of the 6th International conference of the Society for the Spread of Persian Language and Literature (pp.647–654). Tehran: Book House publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Palmer, Frank Robert
    (1986) Mood and modality. Cambridge: CUP
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Poplack, Shana
    (2011) Grammaticalization and linguistic Variation. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp.175–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Poplack, Shana , & Malvar, Elizabeth
    (2007) Elucidating the transition period in linguistic change: The expression of the future in Brazilian Portuguese. Probus, 19, 121–169. doi: 10.1515/PROBUS.2007.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PROBUS.2007.005 [Google Scholar]
  33. Poplack, Shana , & Tagliamonte, Sali
    (1996) Nothing in context: Variation, grammaticalization and past time marking in Nigerian Pidgin English. In Philip Baker & Anand Syea (Eds). Changing meanings, changing functions: Papers relating to grammaticalization in contact languages (pp.71–94). London: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2000) The grammaticalization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change, 11, 315–342.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2001) African American English in the diaspora. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Roberts, Ian , & Roussou, Anna (2003) Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sankoff, David , Tagliamonte, Sali , & Smith, Jennifer
    (2005) Goldvarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows [Computer software]. Available fromindividual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/goldvarb.html
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Schwenter, Scott
    (1994) The grammaticalization of an anterior in progress: Evidence from a peninsular Spanish dialect. Studies in Language, 18, 71–111. doi: 10.1075/sl.18.1.05sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18.1.05sch [Google Scholar]
  39. Shibasaki, Reijirou
    (2010) Frequency as a cause of semantic change. In An Van linden , Jean-Christophe Verstraete , & Kristin Davidse (Eds.), Formal evidence in grammaticalization research (pp.225–244). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Tagliamonte, Sali , Durham, Mercedes , & Smith, Jennifer
    (2014) Grammaticalization at an early stage: Future be going to in conservative British dialects. English Language and Linguistics, 18(1), 75–108. doi: 10.1017/S1360674313000282
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674313000282 [Google Scholar]
  41. Tavangar, Manoochehr , & Amouzadeh, Mohammad
    (2006) Deictic projection: An inquiry into the future-oriented past tense in Persian. Studia Linguistica, 60(1), 97–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2006.00134.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2006.00134.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Torres Cacoullos, Rena
    (2000) Grammaticalization, synchronic variation, and language contact. A study of Spanish progressive -ndo constructions. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Co. doi: 10.1075/slcs.52
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.52 [Google Scholar]
  43. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs , & Brend Heine
    (Eds) (1991) Approaches to grammaticalization (volumes1 & 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Vahedi Langrudi, Mohammad
    (2002) A syntactic analysis and grammaticalization of simple future, with KHA:STAN in Persian. Journal of Humanities, 2(9), 21–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Walker James, Poplack , Shana , & Torres Cacoullos, Rena
    (2004) Looking into the future in English and French. Paper presented atSociolinguistic Symposium 15, Newcastle Upon Tyne.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Windfuhr, Gernot Ludwig
    (1979) Persian grammar: History and state of its study. The Hague; Paris; New York: Mouton De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110800425
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800425 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.16011.gha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.16011.gha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error