1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1354
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1362
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract (International Sign)

Sign languages can be categorized as shared sign languages or deaf community sign languages, depending on the context in which they emerge. It has been suggested that shared sign languages exhibit more variation in the expression of everyday concepts than deaf community sign languages (Meir, Israel, Sandler, Padden, & Aronoff, 2012). For deaf community sign languages, it has been shown that various sociolinguistic factors condition this variation. This study presents one of the first in-depth investigations of how sociolinguistic factors (deaf status, age, clan, gender and having a deaf family member) affect lexical variation in a shared sign language, using a picture description task in Kata Kolok. To study lexical variation in Kata Kolok, two methodologies are devised: the identification of signs by , and a way to compare individual repertoires of signs by calculating the lexical distances between participants. Alongside presenting novel methodologies to study this type of sign language, we present preliminary evidence of sociolinguistic factors that may influence variation in the Kata Kolok lexicon.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.19009.mud
2020-07-29
2020-08-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baronchelli, Andrea, Felici, Maddalena, Loreto, Vittorio, Caglioti, Emanuele, & Steels, Luc
    (2006) Sharp transition towards shared vocabularies in multi-agent systems. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, P06014. 10.1088/1742‑5468/2006/06/P06014
    https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2006/06/P06014 [Google Scholar]
  2. Berlin, Brent, & Kay, Paul
    (1991) Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bickford, J. Albert
    (1991) Lexical variation in Mexican sign language. Sign Language Studies, 72(1), 241–276. 10.1353/sls.1991.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1991.0010 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyd, Robert, & Richerson, Peter J.
    (1988) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cassidy, Steve, Crasborn, Onno, Nieminen, Henri, Stoop, Wessel, Hulsbosch, Micha, Even, Susan, Komen, Erwin, & Johnson, Trevor
    (2018) Signbank: Software to support web based dictionaries of sign language. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Crasborn, Onno, &Sloetjes, Han
    (2008) Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. de Vos, Connie
    (2011) Kata Kolok color terms and the emergence of lexical signs in rural signing communities. The Senses and Society, 6(1), 68–76. 10.2752/174589311X12893982233795
    https://doi.org/10.2752/174589311X12893982233795 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2012) Sign-spatiality in Kata Kolok: How a village sign language of Bali inscribes its signing space. Doctoral dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  9. (2016) Sampling shared sign languages. Sign Language Studies, 16(2), 204–226. 10.1353/sls.2016.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2016.0002 [Google Scholar]
  10. Emmorey, Karen
    (2014) Iconicity as structure mapping. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130301. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0301
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0301 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartzell, Ethan, Ergin, Rabia, Kürşat, Leyla, & Jackendoff, Ray
    (2019) Lexical variation in Central Taurus Sign Language. Inthe 13th conference of Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR 13). Hamburg, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hwang, So-One, Tomita, Nozomi, Morgan, Hope, Ergin, Rabia, İlkbaşaran, Deniz, Seegers, Sharon, Lepic, Ryan, & Padden, Carol
    (2017) Of the body and the hands: Patterned iconicity for semantic categories. Language and Cognition, 9(4), 573–602. doi:  10.1017/langcog.2016.28
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.28 [Google Scholar]
  13. Israel, Assaf, & Sandler, Wendy
    (2011) Phonological category resolution in a new sign language: A comparative study of handshapes. InRachel Channon & Harry van der Hulst (Eds.), Formational units in sign languages (pp.177–202). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614510680.177
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510680.177 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kisch, Shifra
    (2008) “Deaf discourse”: The social construction of deafness in a Bedouin community. Medical Anthropology, 27(3), 283–313. 10.1080/01459740802222807
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740802222807 [Google Scholar]
  15. Klima, Edward S., & Bellugi, Ursula
    (1979) The signs of language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Konrad, Reiner
    (2013) The lexical structure of German Sign Language (DGS) in the light of empirical LSP lexicography: On how to integrate iconicity in a corpus-based lexicon model. Sign Language & Linguistics, 16(1), 111–118. 10.1075/sll.16.1.07kon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.16.1.07kon [Google Scholar]
  17. LeMaster, Barbara
    (2006) Language contraction, revitalization, and Irish women. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 16(2), 211–228. 10.1525/jlin.2006.16.2.211
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2006.16.2.211 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, & Valli, Clayton
    (2001) Sociolinguistic variation in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612824
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612824 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lutzenberger, Hannah
    (in preparation). Kata Kolok dataset. Radboud University, Nijmegen.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (in press). Threat or natural fluctuation? Revisiting language vitality of Kata Kolok, the sign language of a village in Bali. UNESCO World Report of Languages 2019, Paris: UNESCO.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Majid, Asifa, & Levinson, Stephen C.
    (2007) The language of vision I: Colour. InAsifa Majid, (Ed.), Field manual, volume10, (pp.22–25). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Majid, Asifa, Roberts, Seán G., Cilissen, Ludy, Emmorey, Karen, Nicodemus, Brenda, O’Grady, Lucinda, Woll, Bencie, LeLan, Barbara, de Sousa, Hilário, Cansler, Brian L., Shayan, Shakila, de Vos, Connie, Senft, Gunter, Enfield, N. J., Razak, Rogayah A., Fedden, Sebastian, Tufvesson, Sylvia, Dingemanse, Mark, Ozturk, Ozge, Brown, Penelope, Hill, Clair, Le Guen, Olivier, Hirtzel, Vincent, van Gijn, Rik, Sicoli, Mark A., & Levinson, Stephen C.
    (2018) Differential coding of perception in the world’s languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(45), 11369–11376. 10.1073/pnas.1720419115
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720419115 [Google Scholar]
  23. Marsaja, I. Gede
    (2008) Desa Kolok: A deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Lancaster: Ishara Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. McCaskill, Carolyn, Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, & Hill, Joseph
    (2011) The hidden treasure of Black ASL: Its history and structure. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. McKee, David, & Kennedy, Graeme
    (2000) Lexical comparison of signs from American, Australian, British, and New Zealand Sign Languages. InKaren Emmorey & Harlan Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp.43–73). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Meir, Irit, Sandler, Wendy, Padden, Carol A., & Aronoff, Mark
    (2010) Emerging sign languages. InMarc Marschark & Patricia E. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, volume2, (pp.267–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Meir, Irit, Israel, Assaf, Sandler, Wendy, Padden, Carol A., & Aronoff, Mark
    (2012) The influence of community on language structure: Evidence from two young sign languages. Linguistic Variation, 12(2), 247–291. 10.1075/lv.12.2.04mei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.2.04mei [Google Scholar]
  28. Mitchell, Ross E., & Karchmer, Michael A.
    (2004) Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies, 4(2), 138–163. 10.1353/sls.2004.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2004.0005 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nonaka, Angela M.
    (2004) The forgotten endangered languages: Lessons on the importance of remembering from Thailand’s Ban Khor Sign Language. Language in Society, 33(5), 737–767. 10.1017/S004740450404504X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450404504X [Google Scholar]
  30. Nyst, Victoria
    (2007) A descriptive analysis of Adamorobe sign language (Ghana). Amsterdam: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2012) Shared sign languages. InRoland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, & Bencie Woll (Eds.), Sign language: An international handbook (pp.552–574). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110261325.552
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.552 [Google Scholar]
  32. Osugi, Yutaka, Supalla, Ted, & Webb, Rebecca
    (1999) The use of word elicitation to identify distinctive gestural systems on Amami Island. Sign Language & Linguistics, 2(1), 87–112. 10.1075/sll.2.1.12osu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.2.1.12osu [Google Scholar]
  33. Palfreyman, Nick
    (2016) Colour terms in Indonesian sign language varieties: A preliminary study. InUlrike Zeshan & Keiko Sagara (Eds.), Semantic fields in sign languages: Colour, kinship and quantification (pp.269–300). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter and Lancaster: Ishara Press. 10.1515/9781501503429‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503429-008 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2019) Variation in Indonesian Sign Language: A typological and sociolinguistic analysis. Berlin: de Gruyter and Lancaster: Ishara Press. 10.1515/9781501504822
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504822 [Google Scholar]
  35. Reed, Lauren
    (2019) Sign Languages of Western Highlands, Papua New Guinea, and their challenges for sign language typology. Master thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra.
  36. Richie, Russell, Yang, Charles, & Coppola Marie
    (2014) Modeling the emergence of lexicons in homesign systems. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(1), 183–195. 10.1111/tops.12076
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12076 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sagara, Keiko
    (2016) Aspects of number and kinship terms in Japanese Sign Language. InUlrike Zeshan & Keiko Sagara (Eds.), Semantic fields in sign languages (pp.301–331). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter and Nijmegen: Ishara Press. 10.1515/9781501503429‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503429-009 [Google Scholar]
  38. Schembri, Adam, McKee, David, McKee, Rachel, Pivac, Sara, Johnston, Trevor, & Goswell, Della
    (2009) Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change, 21(2), 193–231. 10.1017/S0954394509990081
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990081 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schüller, Anique
    (2018) NGT-SRT: De ontwikkeling van een zinsherhalingstest voor Nederlandse Gebarentaal [NGT-SRT: The development of a sentence repetition test for Sign Language of the Netherlands]. Master thesis, Universiteit Utrecht.
  40. Stamp, Rose, Schembri, Adam, Fenlon, Jordan, Rentelis, Ramas, Woll, Bencie, & Cormier, Kearsy
    (2014) Lexical variation and change in British Sign Language. PLOS ONE9(4): e94053. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0094053
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094053 [Google Scholar]
  41. Speed, Laura J., Wnuk, Ewelina, & Majid, Asifa
    (2018) Studying psycholinguistics out of the lab. InAnnette M. B. de Groot & Pete Hagoort (Eds.), Research methods in psycholinguistics and the neurobiology of language: A practical guide (pp.190–207). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Thompson, Bill, Raviv, Limor, & Kirby, Simon
    (2019) Complexity can be maintained in small populations: A model of lexical variability in emerging sign languages. Presentation at theworkshop Interaction and the Evolution of Linguistic Complexity, Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Trudgill, Peter
    (2015) Societies of intimates and linguistic complexity. InRik De Busser & Randy J. LaPolla (Eds.), Language structure and environment: Social, cultural, and natural factors (pp.133–147). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clscc.6.06tru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.6.06tru [Google Scholar]
  44. Valli, Clayton, & Lucas, Ceil
    (2000) Linguistics of American Sign Language: An introduction. Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Washabaugh, William
    (1986) Five fingers for survival. Karoma.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Winata, Sunaryana, Arhya, I Nyoman, Moeljopawiro, Sukarti, Hinnant, John T., Liang, Yong, Friedman, Thomas B., & Asher, James H.
    (1995) Congenital non-syndromal autosomal recessive deafness in Bengkala, an isolated Balinese village. Journal of Medical Genetics, 32(5), 336–343. 10.1136/jmg.32.5.336
    https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.32.5.336 [Google Scholar]
  47. Woodward, James
    (1989) Basic color term lexicalization across sign languages. Sign Language Studies, 63(1), 145–152. 10.1353/sls.1989.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1989.0021 [Google Scholar]
  48. Woll, Bencie, Allsop, Lorna, & Sutton-Spence, Rachel
    (1990) Sign language varieties in British television: an historical perspective. InSiegmund Prillwitz & Tomas Vollhaber (Eds.), Current trends in European Sign Language research (pp.61–72). Hamburg: Signum.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wray, Alison, & Grace, George W.
    (2007) The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua, 117(3), 543–578. 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.005 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.19009.mud
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.19009.mud
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Kata Kolok , lexical variation , shared sign language , sign language and sociolinguistics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error