1887
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1354
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1362
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper presents results from a study of sociolinguistic variation in Hong Kong Sign Language (HKSL). Specifically, it reports findings about location variation in a class of signs like that are produced at/above the signer’s forehead in their citation form, but are sometimes articulated at a lower location in everyday conversation. Eight hundred tokens of target signs from 40 signers were analyzed. As also found in studies of location ‘dropping’ in similar signs in American Sign Language, Australian Sign Language, and New Zealand Sign Language, variation in HKSL correlates with linguistic and social factors in a systematic way ( Lucas, Bayley, & Valli, 2001 ; Schembri, McKee, McKee, Pivac, Johnston, & Goswell, 2009 ). A comparison of findings across these four languages is presented and discussed. The results of the present study suggest that a set of forehead-located signs that express the names of deaf schools may have affected results due to their salience. The work environment (i.e., sign language related work roles) of participants may also affect ‘careful’ versus lowered production of forehead signs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.2.1.01siu
2016-09-19
2019-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ash, Sharon
    (2002) Social class. In Jack K. Chambers , Peter Trudgill , & Natalie Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp.402–422). Massachusetts, USA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey, Guy , Wikle, Tom , Tillery, Jan , & Sand, Lori
    (1991) The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change, 3, 241–264. doi: 10.1017/S0954394500000569
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000569 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey, Guy
    (2002) Real and apparent time. In Jack K. Chambers , Peter Trudgill , & Natalie Schiling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp.312–332). Massachusetts, USA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baguley, Thomas
    (2012) Serious stats: A guide to advanced statistics for the behavioral sciences. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brentari, Diane
    (1998) A prosodic model of sign language phonology. London: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan L.
    (2002) Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change, 14, 261–290. doi: 10.1017/S0954394502143018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394502143018 [Google Scholar]
  7. Census and Statistics Department
    Census and Statistics Department (2014) Social data collected via the general household survey: Special topics report no. 62, persons with disabilities and chronic diseases. RetrievedDecember 2, 2015, fromwww.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B11301622014XXXXB0100.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Centre for Sign Linguistics and Deaf Studies
    Centre for Sign Linguistics and Deaf Studies (2013) Publications. RetrievedMay 20, 2015, fromwww.cslds.org/v3/publications.php
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Yijun , & Tai, James H-Y.
    (2009) Lexical variation and change in Taiwan Sign Language. In James H-Y Tai , & Jane Tsay (Eds.), Taiwan Sign Language and beyond (pp.131–148). Chia-Yi, Taiwan: The Taiwan Institute for the Humanities, National Chung Cheng University.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheshire, Jenny
    (2002) Sex and gender in variationist research. In Jack K. Chambers , Peter Trudgill , & Natalie Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp.423–443). Massachusetts, USA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Crasborn, Onno , & Sloetjes, Han
    (2008) Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. Proceedings of third workshop on the representation and processing of sign languages: Construction and exploitation of sign language corpora, 39–43. RetrievedMarch 22, 2015, fromwww.mpi.nl/publications/escidoc-61042/@@popup
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2014) Improving the exploitation of linguistic annotations in ELAN. In Nicoletta Calzolari , Khalid Choukri , Thierry Declerck , Hrafn Loftsson , Bente Maegaard , Joseph Mariani , Asuncion Moreno , Jan Odijk , & Stelios Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC'14) (pp.3604–3608). RetrievedMarch 22, 2015, fromwww.mpi.nl/publications/escidoc-2070475
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Deuchar, Margaret
    (1981) Variation in British Sign Language. In Bencie Woll , Jim Kyle , & Margaret Deuchar (Eds.), Perspectives on British Sign Language and deafness (pp.109–119). Guildford: Billing and Sons Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dinkin, Aaron
    (2007) The real effect of word frequency on phonetic variation. Paper presented atthe 31st Penn Linguistics Colloquium, Philadelphia, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Eichmann, Hanna , & Rosenstock, Rachel
    (2014) Regional variation in German Sign Language: The role of schools (re-)visited. Sign Language Studies, 14(2), 175–202. doi: 10.1353/sls.2014.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2014.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Frishberg, Nancy
    (1975) Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language, 51, 696–719. doi: 10.2307/412894
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412894 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hair, Joseph F. , Black, William C. , Babin, Barry J. , Anderson, Rolph E. , & Tatham, Ronald L.
    (2006) Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hong Kong Society for the Deaf
    Hong Kong Society for the Deaf (1987)  [The origin and development of Hong Kong Sign Language]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Society for the Deaf.
  19. Johnson, Daniel E.
    (2009) Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 359–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00108.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnston, Trevor , & Schembri, Adam
    (2007) Australian Sign Language (Auslan): An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511607479
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607479 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kerswill, Paul , & Williams, Ann
    (2002) “Salience” as an explanatory factor in language. In Mari C. Jones , & Edith Esch (Eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external, and extra-linguistic factors (pp.81–110). New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110892598.81
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892598.81 [Google Scholar]
  22. Labov, William
    (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1994) Principles of linguistic change, volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Leeson, Lorraine , & Grehan, Carmel
    (2004) To the lexicon and beyond: The effect of gender on variation in Irish Sign Language. In Mieke Van Herreweghe & Myriam Vermeerbergen (Eds.), To the lexicon and beyond: Sociolinguistics in European deaf communities (pp.39–73). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lucas, Ceil , & Valli, Clayton
    (1992) Language contact in the American deaf community. San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lucas, Ceil , Bayley, Robert , & Valli, Clayton
    (2001) Sociolinguistic variation in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511612824
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612824 [Google Scholar]
  27. McCaskill, Carolyn , Lucas, Ceil , Bayley, Robert , & Hill, Joseph
    (2011) The hidden treasure of Black ASL. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. McKee, David , & Kennedy, Graeme
    (1999) A list of 1,000 frequently used signs in New Zealand Sign Language. In Graeme Kennedy (Ed.), New Zealand Sign Language: Distribution, origins, reference (occasional publication 2) (pp.17–25). Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington Deaf Studies Research Unit.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2006) The distribution of signs in New Zealand Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 6(4), 372–390. doi: 10.1353/sls.2006.0027
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2006.0027 [Google Scholar]
  30. Menard, Scott W.
    (Ed.) (2002) Applied logistic regression analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781412983433
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983433 [Google Scholar]
  31. Milroy, Lesley , & Gordon, Matthew
    (2003) Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470758359
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758359 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mitchell, Ross E. , & Karchmer, Michael A.
    (2004) Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies, 4(2), 138–163. doi: 10.1353/sls.2004.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2004.0005 [Google Scholar]
  33. Moineddin, Rahim , Matheson, Flora I. , & Glazier, Richard H.
    (2007) A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(34), 1–10. doi: 10.1186/1471‑2288‑7‑34
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-34 [Google Scholar]
  34. Neu, Helene
    (1980) Ranking of constraints on /t,d/ deletion in American English. In William Labov (Ed.), Locating language in time and space (pp.37–54). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Penn, Claire , & Reagan, Timothy
    (1994) The properties of South African Sign Language: Lexical diversity & syntactic unity. Sign Language Studies, 85(1), 319–327. doi: 10.1353/sls.1994.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1994.0011 [Google Scholar]
  36. Phillips, Betty
    (1984) Word frequency and the actuation of sound change. Language, 60, 320–342. doi: 10.2307/413643
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413643 [Google Scholar]
  37. Quinn, Gary
    (2010) Schoolization: An account of the origins of regional variation in British Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 10(4), 476–501. doi: 10.1353/sls.0.0056
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.0.0056 [Google Scholar]
  38. Schembri, Adam , McKee, David , McKee, Rachel , Pivac, Sara , Johnston, Trevor , & Goswell, Della
    (2009) Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change, 21, 193–231. doi: 10.1017/S0954394509990081
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990081 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schembri, Adam , & Johnston, Trevor
    (2004) Sociolinguistic variation in Auslan (Australian Sign Language): A research project in progress. Deaf Worlds: International Journal of Deaf Studies, 20(1), 78–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Schermer, Trude
    (2003) From variant to standard: An overview of the standardization process of the lexicon of sign language of the Netherlands over two decades. Sign Language Studies, 3(4), 469–486. doi: 10.1353/sls.2003.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2003.0017 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schilling-Estes, Natalie
    (2007) Sociolinguistic fieldwork. In Robert Bayley & Ceil Lucas (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Theories, methods, and applications (pp.165–189). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511619496.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619496.010 [Google Scholar]
  42. Siu, Rebecca
    (2015) Sociolinguistic variation in Hong Kong Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. [Manuscript in preparation].
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Stamp, Rose , Schembri, Adam , Fenlon, Jordan , Rentelis, Ramas , Woll, Bencie , & Cormier, Kearsy
    (2014) Lexical variation and change in British Sign Language. PLoS ONE9(4): e94053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094053
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094053 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sutton-Spence, Rachel , & Woll, Bencie
    (1999) The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139167048
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167048 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sze, Felix , Chu, Kenny , Lo, Connie , & Lo, Lisa
    (2013) Lexical variations and diachronic change in Hong Kong Sign Language. Poster presented atthe TISLR11, University College London, England.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sze, Felix , Lo, Connie , Lo, Lisa , & Chu, Kenny
    (2013) Historical development of Hong Kong Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 13(2), 155–185. doi: 10.1353/sls.2013.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2013.0002 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tagliamonte, Sali
    (2006) Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511801624
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801624 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tang, Gladys
    (2007) Hong Kong Sign Language: A trilingual dictionary with linguistic descriptions. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Tyrone, Martha E. , & Mauk, Claude E.
    (2010) Sign lowering and phonetic reduction in American Sign Language. Journal of Phonetics, 38(2), 317–328. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  50. van Hoek, Karen , Bellugi, Ursula , & Fok, Angela
    (1986) Sign language universals: Evidence from Chinese Sign Language. Working paper. Salk Institute, University of California, San Diego & The University of Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Winzer, Margret A.
    (1993) Education, urbanization, and the deaf community: A case study of Toronto, 1870–1900. In John V. Van Cleve (Ed.), Deaf history unveiled: Interpretations from the new scholarship (pp.127–145). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Woll, Bencie
    (1987) Historical and comparative aspects of British Sign Language. In Jim Kyle (Ed.), Sign and school: Using signs in deaf children’s development (pp.12–34). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Woodward, James
    (1993) Intuitive judgments of Hong Kong signers about the relationship of sign language varieties in Hong Kong and Shanghai. CUHK Papers in Linguistics, 4, 88–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Yau, Shun-chiu
    (1977) The Chinese signs: Lexicon of the standard sign language for the deaf in China. Hong Kong: Chiu Ming Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Young, Richard , & Bayley, Robert
    (1996) VARBRUL analysis for second language acquisition research. In Robert Bayley & Dennis R. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp.254–306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.10.11you
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.10.11you [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.2.1.01siu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.2.1.01siu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error