Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1354
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1362
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This is the first variationist sociotonetic study to use free-speech data for exploring tone. Due to the challenges of analyzing tone in free-speech data, prior work on sociotonetics has been limited to relatively formal speech styles: word lists, sentence frames, and phrase lists. But connected speech styles, including free speech and reading passages, are important for segmental sociophonetics and most other linguistic variables. Will free-speech data always be out of reach for sociotonetics? Can tone variation in connected speech data be normalized and meaningfully analyzed for sociolinguistic research questions? Using field data from the Sui language of China, this paper develops a practical approach for analyzing tone variation in connected speech data, and then applies it to a specific research question about dialect contact in exogamous Sui villages. Results show that some types of intra- and inter-speaker tone variation in connected speech can be effectively analyzed, although other types of tone variables are neutralized in this speech style.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adank, Patti , van Hout, Roeland , & Smits, Roel
    (2004) An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Standard Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1729–1738. doi: 10.1121/1.1779271
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1779271 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adda-Decker, Martine , & Snoeren, Natalie
    (2011) Quantifying temporal speech reduction in French using forced speech alignment. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 261–270. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.11.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.11.011 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aston, John , Chiou, Jeng-Min , & Evans, Jonathan
    (2010) Linguistic pitch analysis using functional principal component mixed effect models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 59, 297–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9876.2009.00689.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2009.00689.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Astruc, Lluisa
    (2013) Prosody. In Mark Jones & Rachel-Anne Knight (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to phonetics (pp.126–139). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauer, Robert , Cheung, Kwan-Hin , & Cheung, Pak-Man
    (2003) Variation and merger of the rising tones in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change, 15, 211–225. doi: 10.1017/S0954394503152039
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394503152039 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell, Allan
    (1984) Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145–204. doi: 10.1017/S004740450001037X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X [Google Scholar]
  7. Boersma, Paul , & Weenink, David
    (2014) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer(Version 5.3.82) [Computer program]. Available from: www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
  8. Bradley, David
    (2007) East and Southeast Asia. In Ronald E. Asher & Christopher Moseley (Eds.), Atlas of the world’s languages (2nd ed.) (pp.157–208). London; New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, J. Marvin
    (1975) The great tone split: Did it work in two opposite ways?In Jimmy Harris & James Chamberlain (Eds.), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Gedney (pp.33–48). Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Castro, Andy
    (2011) Southern Sui: A fourth Sui dialect. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 4, 1–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Castro, Andy , & Pan, Xingwen
    (2014) Shuiyu diaocha yanjiu [Investigation of the Sui language]. Guiyang, China: Guizhou People’s Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chambers, J. K.
    (1992) Dialect acquisition. Language, 68, 673–705. doi: 10.1353/lan.1992.0060
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0060 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2002) Dynamics of dialect convergence. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 117–130. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00180
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00180 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chao, Y. R.
    (1930) A system of tone letters. La Maitre Phonetique, 45, 24–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chasaide, Ailbhe , & Gobl, Christer
    (1993) Contextual variation of the vowel voice source as a function of adjacent consonants. Language and Speech, 36, 303–330.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, C.-J. , Gopinath, R. , Monkowski, M. , Picheny, M. , & Shen, K.
    (1997) New methods in continuous Mandarin speech recognition. Proceedings of the fifth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Rhodes, Greece, 1543–1546.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Clark, John , & Yallop, Colin
    (1995) An introduction to phonetics and phonology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Clopper, Cynthia
    (2009) Computational methods for analyzing acoustic vowel data for talker differences. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 1430–1442. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2009.00165.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00165.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Drager, Katie , & Hay, Jennifer
    (2012) Exploiting random intercepts: Two case studies in sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change, 24, 59–78. doi: 10.1017/S0954394512000014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000014 [Google Scholar]
  20. Edmondson, Jerold , Esling, John , Harris, Jimmy , & Wei, James
    (2004) A phonetic study of Sui consonants and tones. Mon-Khmer Studies, 34, 47–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Edmondson, Jerold , & Solnit, David
    (Eds.) (1988) Comparative Kadai: Linguistic studies beyond Tai. Dallas, Texas: SIL.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ernestus, Mirjam , & Warner, Natasha
    (2011) An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 253–260. doi: 10.1016/S0095‑4470(11)00055‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(11)00055-6 [Google Scholar]
  23. Evans, Betsy
    (2011) Aspects of the acoustic analysis of imitation. In Dennis Preston & Nancy Niedzielski (Eds.), A reader in sociophonetics (pp.379–391). New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Evans, Jonathan , Chu, Man-ni , Aston, John , & Su, Chao-yu
    (2010) Linguistic and human effects on F0 in a tonal dialect of Qiang. Phonetica, 67, 82–99. doi: 10.1159/000319380
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000319380 [Google Scholar]
  25. Flynn, Nicholas
    (2011) Comparing vowel formant normalization procedures. York Papers in Linguistics, 2, 1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fought, Carmen
    (1999) A majority sound change in a minority community: /u/-fronting in Chicano English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3, 5–23. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.t01‑1‑00060
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.t01-1-00060 [Google Scholar]
  27. Foulkes, Paul , & Docherty, Gerard
    (2006) The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 409–438. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Fridland, Valerie , & Kendall, Tyler
    (2012) Exploring the relationship between production and perception in the mid front vowels of U.S. English. Lingua, 122, 779–793. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  29. Fromkin, Victoria
    (1978) Tone: A linguistic survey. New York: Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gerstman, Louis
    (1968) Classification of self-normalized vowels. IEEE Transactions of Audio Electroacoustics, AU-16, 78–80. doi: 10.1109/TAU.1968.1161953
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TAU.1968.1161953 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hart, Johan’t , Collier, René , & Cohen, Antonie
    (1990) A perceptual study of intonation: An experimental approach to speech melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627743
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627743 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hermes, Dik , & van Gestel, Joost
    (1991) The frequency scale of speech intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 97–102. doi: 10.1121/1.402397
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402397 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hildebrandt, Kristine
    (2003) Manange tone: Scenarios of retention and loss in two communities. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2005) A phonetic analysis of Manange segmental and suprasegmental properties. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 28, 1–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hombert, Jean-Marie
    (1978) Consonant types, vowel quality, and tone. In Victoria Fromkin (Ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey (pp.77–111). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hombert, Jean-Marie , Ohala, John , & Ewan, William
    (1979) Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language, 55, 37–58. doi: 10.2307/412518
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412518 [Google Scholar]
  37. House, Arthur , & Fairbanks, Grant
    (1953) The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 105–113. doi: 10.1121/1.1906982
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906982 [Google Scholar]
  38. Huang, Jingyuan , & Holt, Lori
    (2009) General perceptual contributions to lexical tone normalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 3983–3994. doi: 10.1121/1.3125342
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3125342 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2011) Evidence for the central origin of lexical tone normalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, 1145–1148. doi: 10.1121/1.3543994
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3543994 [Google Scholar]
  40. Huang, Hank C.-H. , & Seide, Frank
    (2000) Pitch tracking and tone features for Mandarin speech recognition. Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing , Istanbul, Turkey, 1523–1526.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Johnson, Daniel E.
    (2009) Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 359–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00108.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Johnson, Keith
    (1997) Speech perception without speaker normalization. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp.145–166). San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2003) Speaker normalization in speech perception. In David Pisoni & Robert Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp.361–389). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2012) Acoustic and auditory phonetics (3rd ed.). Malden, MA; Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kendall, Tyler & Thomas, Erik
    (2010) Vowels: Vowel manipulation, normalization, and plotting in R (software package). Available from: cran.r-project.org/we/packages/vowels/
  46. Labov, William
    (1966) The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. (2nd edition 2006, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (1972) Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society, 1, 97–120. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500006576
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006576 [Google Scholar]
  48. Labov, William , Ash, Sharon , & Boberg, Charles
    (2006) The linguistic atlas of North America. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Ladd, Robert , & Silverman, Kim
    (1984) Vowel intrinsic pitch in connected speech. Phonetica, 41, 31–40. doi: 10.1159/000261708
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000261708 [Google Scholar]
  50. Ladefoged, Peter
    (2003) Phonetic data analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Leather, Jonathan
    (1983) Speaker normalization in perception of lexical tone. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 373–382.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Lee, Tan , Lau, Wai , Wong, Y. W. , & Ching, P. C.
    (2002) Using tone information in Cantonese continuous speech recognition. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Processing, 1, 83–102. doi: 10.1145/595576.595581
    https://doi.org/10.1145/595576.595581 [Google Scholar]
  53. Lei, Xin
    (2006) Modeling lexical tones for Mandarin large vocabulary continuous speech recognition. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Li, Fang Kuei
    (1948) The distribution of initials and tones in the Sui language. Language, 24, 160–167. doi: 10.2307/409796
    https://doi.org/10.2307/409796 [Google Scholar]
  55. (1965) The Tai and Kam-Sui languages. Lingua, 14, 148–179. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(65)90040‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(65)90040-9 [Google Scholar]
  56. Liang, Lei , & Meng, Xiaolin
    (2011) A sociophonetic study on tones of Chongqing Mandarin in gender and age difference. Paper presented atthe International Conference of Phonetic Sciences XVII, Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. (2013) Chongqing fangyan danzidiaode gongshibianyi [Chongqing dialect synchronic tone variation]. Language and Linguistics, 14, 929–959.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Liberman, Mark , & Pierrehumbert, Janet
    (1984) Intonational variance under changes in pitch range and length. In Mark Aronoff & Richard T. Oehrle (Eds.), Language sound structure (pp.157–233). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Lobanov, Boris
    (1971) Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 606–608. doi: 10.1121/1.1912396
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912396 [Google Scholar]
  60. Loveday, Leo
    (1981) Pitch, politeness and sexual role: An exploratory investigation into the pitch correlates of English and Japanese politeness formulae. Language and Speech, 24, 71–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Matisoff, James
    (1970) Glottal dissimilation and the Lahu high-rising tone: A tonogenetic case study. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 90, 13–44. doi: 10.2307/598429
    https://doi.org/10.2307/598429 [Google Scholar]
  62. (1973) Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. In Larry Hyman (Ed.), Consonant types and tone (pp.71–95). Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics, No. 1. Los Angeles: UCLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Meyerhoff, Miriam
    (in press) Writing a linguistic symphony: Analysing variation while doing language documentation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics..
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Miller, James
    (1989) Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2114–2134. doi: 10.1121/1.397862
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397862 [Google Scholar]
  65. Miotti, Renzo
    (2002) Friulian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 32, 237–247. doi: 10.1017/S0025100302001056
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100302001056 [Google Scholar]
  66. Mok, Peggy , Zuo, Donghui , & Wong, Peggy W. Y.
    (2013) Production and perception of a sound change in progress: Tone merging in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change, 25, 341–370. doi: 10.1017/S0954394513000161
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394513000161 [Google Scholar]
  67. Moore, Corinne , & Jongman, Allard
    (1997) Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1864–1877. doi: 10.1121/1.420092
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.420092 [Google Scholar]
  68. Nearey, Terrance
    (1977) Phonetic feature systems for vowels. Doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. (1989) Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2088–2113. doi: 10.1121/1.397861
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397861 [Google Scholar]
  70. Nguyen, Hong Quang , Nocera, Pascal , Castelli, Eric , & Trinh, Van Loan
    (2008) Tone recognition of Vietnamese continuous speech using Hidden Markov Model. Second International Conference on Communications and Electronics, 235–239. Available fromieeexplore.ieee.org. doi: 10.1109/CCE.2008.4578964
    https://doi.org/10.1109/CCE.2008.4578964 [Google Scholar]
  71. Nolan, Francis
    (2003) Intonational equivalence: An experimental evaluation of pitch scales. In Maria-Josep Solé , Daniel Recasens , & Joaquin Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences (pp.771–774). Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Ohala, John
    (1978) Production of tones. In Victoria Fromkin (Ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey (pp.5–39). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑267350‑4.50006‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-267350-4.50006-6 [Google Scholar]
  73. Ohala, John , & Ewan, W.
    (1973) Speed of pitch change [Abstract]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53, 345. doi: 10.1121/1.1982441
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1982441 [Google Scholar]
  74. Ohara, Yumiko
    (1992) Gender-dependent pitch levels: A comparative study in Japanese and English. In Kira Hall , Mary Bucholtz , & Birch Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp.469–477). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Peng, Gang , & Wang, William S.-Y.
    (2005) Tone recognition of continuous Cantonese speech based on support vector machines. Speech Communication, 25, 49–62. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2004.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2004.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  76. Pisoni, David
    (1997) Some thoughts on 'normalization' in speech perception. In Keith Johnson & John Mullenix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp.9–32). San Diego, California: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Podesva, Robert
    (2007) Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11, 478–504. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00334.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00334.x [Google Scholar]
  78. Rose, Philip
    (1987) Considerations in the normalization of the fundamental frequency of linguistic tone. Speech Communication, 6, 343–351. doi: 10.1016/0167‑6393(87)90009‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(87)90009-4 [Google Scholar]
  79. (1991) How effective are long term mean and standard deviation as normal parameters for tonal fundamental frequency?Speech Communication, 10, 229–247. doi: 10.1016/0167‑6393(91)90014‑K
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(91)90014-K [Google Scholar]
  80. (1993) A linguistic-phonetic acoustic analysis of Shanghai tones. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 13, 185–220. doi: 10.1080/07268609308599495
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268609308599495 [Google Scholar]
  81. (1997) A seven-tone dialect in Southern Thai with super high: Pakphanang tonal acoustics and physiological inferences. In Arthur Abramson (Ed.), Southeast Asian linguistics studies in honour of Vichin Panupong (pp.191–208). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Rosner, B. , & Pickering, J.
    (1994) Vowel perception and production. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198521389.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198521389.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  83. Ross, Elliot , Edmondson, Jerold , & Seibert, Burton G.
    (1986) The effect of affect on various acoustic measures of prosody in tone and non-tone languages: A comparison based on computer analysis of voice. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 283–302.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Sanchez, Kauyumari , Hay, Jennifer , & Nilson, Elissa
    (2015) Contextual activation of Australia can affect New Zealanders’ vowel productions. Journal of Phonetics, 48, 76–95. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  85. Sankoff, Gillian , & Blondeau, Hélène
    (2007) Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language, 83, 560–588. doi: 10.1353/lan.2007.0106
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0106 [Google Scholar]
  86. Shuiyu Diaocha Baogao [Sui Language Research Report] (1956) Unpublished manuscript, Gui yang, Guizhou, China. Acquired from Jerold Edmondson, University of Texas, Arlington.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Siegel, Jeff
    (2010) Second dialect acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511777820
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777820 [Google Scholar]
  88. Stanford, James
    (2007) Dialect contact and identity: A case study of exogamous Sui clans. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. (2008a) A sociotonetic analysis of Sui dialect contact. Language Variation and Change, 20, 409–450. doi: 10.1017/S0954394508000161
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394508000161 [Google Scholar]
  90. (2008b) Child dialect acquisition: New perspectives on parent/peer influence. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 567–596. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00383.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00383.x [Google Scholar]
  91. (2009a) 'Eating the food of our place': Sociolinguistic loyalties in multidialectal Sui villages. Language in Society, 38, 287–309. doi: 10.1017/S0047404509090502
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509090502 [Google Scholar]
  92. (2009b) Clan as a sociolinguistic variable. In James Stanford & Dennis Preston (Eds.), Variation in indigenous minority languages (pp.463–484). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.25.23sta
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.25.23sta [Google Scholar]
  93. (2011) A 50-year comparison of regional dialect variation in the Sui language. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 4, 120–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Sundberg, Johan
    (1973) Data on maximum speed of pitch changes. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Reports, 4, 39–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. (1979) Maximum speed of pitch changes in singers and untrained subjects. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 71–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Thomas, Erik
    (2002) Instrumental phonetics. In J. K. Chambers , Peter Trudgill , & Natalie Schil ling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp.168–200). Oxford, UK; Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. (2010) A longitudinal analysis of the durability of the Northern-Midland dialect boundary in Ohio. American Speech, 85, 375–430. doi: 10.1215/00031283‑2010‑022
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2010-022 [Google Scholar]
  98. (2011) Sociophonetics: An introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Thomas, Erik , & Kendall, Tyler
    (2007) NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. Available fromlingtools.uoregon.edu/norm/norm1.php
  100. Tingsabadh, Kalaya M.R. , & Deeprasert, Daranee
    (1997) Tones in Standard Thai Connected Speech. In Arthur Abramson (Ed.), Southeast Asian linguistics studies: In honor of Vichin Panupong (pp.297–308). Chulalongkorn University Press. Available fromsealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/tingsabadh1997tones.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Tran, Do-Dat , Castelli, Eric , Serignat, Jean-Francois , Trinh, Van Loan , & Le, Xuan Hung
    (2005) Influence of F0 on Vietnamese syllable perception. INTERSPEECH, Lisbon, Portugal, September 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Traunmüller, Hartmut , & Eriksson, Anders
    (1995) The perceptual evaluation of F0 excursions in speech as evidenced by liveliness estimations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1905–1915. doi: 10.1121/1.412942
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.412942 [Google Scholar]
  103. Trudgill, Peter
    (1986) Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Van Niekerk, Daniel , & Barnard, Etienne
    (2014) Predicting utterance pitch targets in Yoruba for tone realization in speech synthesis. Speech Communication, 56, 229–242. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2013.01.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.01.009 [Google Scholar]
  105. Verbrugge, Robert , Strange, Winifred , Shankweiler, Donald , & Edman, Thomas
    (1976) What information enables a listener to map a talker’s vowel space?Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 198–212. doi: 10.1121/1.381065
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381065 [Google Scholar]
  106. Watt, Dominic , & Fabricius, Anne
    (2002) Evaluation of a technique for improving the mapping of multiple speakers’ vowel spaces in the F1~F2 plane. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 9, 159–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Wolfram, Walt
    (1986) Language variation in the United States. In O. L. Taylor (Ed.), Nature of communication disorders in culturally and linguistically diverse populations (pp.73–115). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Wolfram, Walt , & Schilling-Estes, Natalie
    (2006) American English: Dialects and variation (2nd ed.). Malden, Massachusetts; Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Wong, Patrick C. M. , & Diehl, Randy L.
    (2003) Perceptual normalization for inter- and intratalker variation in Cantonese level tones. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 413–421. doi: 10.1044/1092‑4388(2003/034)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/034) [Google Scholar]
  110. Wright, Richard , & Shryock, Aaron
    (1993) The effects of pitch on implosives in SiSwati. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 23, 16–23. doi: 10.1017/S0025100300004734
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300004734 [Google Scholar]
  111. Xia, Yongliang
    (1988/2008) Duyunshi Yanghexiang Pandong Shuiyu diaocha [Duyun city Yanghe village Pandong Sui language investigation]. In Yongqu Liang (Ed.), Guizhou Liushanliushui Minzu Diaocha Ziliao Xuanbian [Selections from Guizhou Nationalities Investigations] (pp.254–265). Guiyang, China: Guizhou Nationalities Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Xu, Yi
    (1994) Production and perception of coarticulated tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 2240–2253. doi: 10.1121/1.408684
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408684 [Google Scholar]
  113. (1997) Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 61–83. doi: 10.1006/jpho.1996.0034
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0034 [Google Scholar]
  114. (1999) Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 55–105. doi: 10.1006/jpho.1999.0086
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0086 [Google Scholar]
  115. (2001) Sources of tonal variations in connected speech. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 17, 1–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  116. (2004) Understanding tone from the perspective of production and perception. Language and Linguistics, 5, 757–797.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. (2005) Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Communication, 46, 220–251. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.014 [Google Scholar]
  118. (2006) Tone in connected discourse. In Keith Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp.742–750). Oxford: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/04802‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04802-1 [Google Scholar]
  119. Xu, Yi , & Sun Xuejing
    (2002) Maximum speed of pitch change and how it may relate to speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1399–1413. doi: 10.1121/1.1445789
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1445789 [Google Scholar]
  120. Xu, Yi , & Wang, Q. Emily
    (2001) Pitch targets and their realization: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Speech Communication, 33, 319–337. doi: 10.1016/S0167‑6393(00)00063‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00063-7 [Google Scholar]
  121. Yaeger-Dror, Malcah , & Fagyal, Zsuzsanna
    (2011) Anayzing prosody: Best practices for the analysis of prosody. In Marianna Di Paolo & Malcah Yaeger-Dror (Eds.), Sociophonetics: A student’s guide (pp.119–130). London; New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Yip, Moira
    (2002) Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139164559
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164559 [Google Scholar]
  123. Yuasa, Patricia
    (2008) Culture and gender of voice pitch: A sociophonetic comparison of the Japanese and Americans. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Zeng, Xiaoyu , & Yao, Fuxiang
    (1996) Han-Shui cidian [Chinese-Sui dictionary]. Chengdu: Sichuan Minorities Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Zhang, Junru
    (1980) Shuiyu jianzhi [A sketch of the Sui language]. Beijing: Minorities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Zhou, Jian-lai , Tian, Ye , Shi, Yu , Huang, Chao , & Chang, Eric
    (2004) Tone articulation modeling for Mandarin spontaneous speech recognition. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 1, 997–1000.
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Zhu, Xiaonong Sean
    (1999) Shanghai tonetics. Munich; Newcastle: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error