1887
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2215-1354
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1362
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates the variation of pronominal forms in Sasak, an Austronesian language spoken in eastern Indonesia. The study marks the first variationist sociolinguistic work on Sasak. Using data from eight conversations between 15 non-noble speakers, pronominal forms were coded for whether they were realized as a free pronoun or a clitic. Further, the discourse was examined to identify the referents and to observe the pragmatic effect of the forms used. The results show clitics dominate the distribution. Further, the results demonstrate that a higher percentage of clitics are preferred with the basic form for first person referents, but speakers apply a different strategy for second person referents; speakers use first person plural and third person singular forms to address their interlocutor when triggered by a Face Threatening Act (see Brown & Levinson, 1987).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.20006.kha
2021-10-06
2021-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adger, David, & Trousdale, Graeme
    (2007) Variation in English syntax: Theoretical implications. English Language and Linguistics, 11(2), 261–278. 10.1017/S1360674307002250
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674307002250 [Google Scholar]
  2. Asikin-Garmager, Eli Scott
    (2017) Sasak voice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa. 10.17077/etd.dfu5gcvv
    https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.dfu5gcvv [Google Scholar]
  3. Austin, Peter. K.
    (2004) Clitics in Sasak, Eastern Indonesia. Paper presented atLinguistics Association of Great Britain Annual Conference, Sheffield: SOAS Research Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2013) Too many nasal verbs: Dialect variation in the voice system of Sasak. InAlexander Adelaar (Eds.), Voice variation in Austronesian languages of Indonesia, 54, 29–46. Jakarta: NUSA.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2014) Aksara Sasak, an endangered script and scribal practice. Paper presented at theInternational Workshop on Endangered Scripts of Island Southeast Asia, Tokyo, Japan. RetrievedAugust 30, 2016, fromhttps://lingdy.aa-ken.jp/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/140227-intl-symp-and-ws_peter_k_austin_paper.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bassiouney, Reem
    (2009) Arabic sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748623730.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748623730.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blust, Robert
    (2013) The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen C.
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Victoria, & McDonnell, Bradley
    (2019) Western Austronesian voice. Annual Review of Linguistics, 5(1), 173–195. RetrievedFebruary 2, 2020, from doi:  10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011718‑011731
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011731 [Google Scholar]
  10. Djenar, Dwi Noverini
    (2006) Patterns and variation of address terms in colloquial Indonesian. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 29(2), 22.1–22.16. 10.2104/aral0622
    https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0622 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2007) Self-reference and its variation in Indonesian. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(1), 23–40. RetrievedFebruary 2, 2019, fromhttps://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/v4sp12007/djenar.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Djenar, Dwi Noverini, & Ewing, Michael
    (2015) Language varieties and youthful involvement in Indonesian fiction. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 24(2), 108–128. 10.1177/0963947015573387
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947015573387 [Google Scholar]
  13. Djenar, Dwi Noverini, Ewing, Michael, & Manns, Howard
    (2018) Style and intersubjectivity in youth interaction. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614516439
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614516439 [Google Scholar]
  14. Eberhard, David M., Simons, Gary F., & Fennig, Charles D.
    (Eds) (2019) Ethnologue: Languages of the world (22nd ed.). RetrievedJanuary 3, 2019, fromhttps://www.ethnologue.com/
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Enbe, Claudia Ruth, & Tobin, Yishai
    (2008) Sociolinguistic variation in the intonation of Buenos Aires Spanish. Sociolinguistic Studies, 1(3), 347–382.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Errington, J. Joseph
    (1986) Continuity and change in Indonesian language development. The Journal of Asian Studies, 45(2), 329–353. 10.2307/2055846
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2055846 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ewing, Michael
    (2001) Reference and recovery in Cirebon Javanese. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 25–47. 10.1080/07268600120042444
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600120042444 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2014) Motivations for first and second person subject expression and ellipsis in Javanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 63, 48–62. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.023 [Google Scholar]
  19. Grafmiller, Jason
    (2014) Variation in English genitives across modality and genres. English Language and Linguistics, 18(3), 471–496. 10.1017/S1360674314000136
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674314000136 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jacq, Pascale
    (1998) How many dialects are there?Working Paper in Sasak, 1, 67–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Khalik, Abdul
    (2013) The pattern of Sasak word choice. Paper presented atInternational Conference on Education and Language, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. RetrievedMay 13, 2019, fromartikel.ubl.ac.id/index.php/icel/article/view/201/201
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kortmann, Bernd
    (2006) Syntactic variation in English: A global perspective. InBas Aarts & April McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp.603–624). Berlin: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470753002.ch26
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch26 [Google Scholar]
  23. Labov, William
    (1966) Social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lambrecht, Knud
    (1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, Xiaoshi
    (2010) Sociolinguistic variation in the speech of learners of Chinese as a Second Language: CSL sociolinguistic variation. Language Learning, 60(2), 366–408. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00560.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00560.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Mahyuni
    Mahyuni (2006) Speech styles and cultural consciousness in Sasak community. Mataram: Yayasan Cerdas.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mahyuni
    Mahyuni (2007) Valuing language and culture: An example from Sasak. Makara, Social Humaniora, 11(2), 79–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Manns, Howard
    (2012) First-person pronominal variation, stance and identity in Indonesia. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 32(4), 435–456. 10.1080/07268602.2012.744265
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2012.744265 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nothofer, Bernd
    (2000) A preliminary analysis of the history of Sasak language levels. Working Paper in Sasak, 2, 57–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo
    (1968) Javanese speech levels. Indonesia, 6, 54–81. 10.2307/3350711
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3350711 [Google Scholar]
  31. Purwo, Bambang Kaswanti
    (1984) The categorial system in contemporary Indonesian: Pronouns. NUSA, Linguistics Studies in Indonesian and Languages of Indonesia, 19, 55–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sneddon, James N.
    (2003) Diglossia in Indonesian. Bijdragen Tot de Taal & Land En Volkenkunde, 159(4), 519–549. 10.1163/22134379‑90003741
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003741 [Google Scholar]
  33. Syahdan
    (2000) Code-witching in the speech of elite Sasaks. Working Paper in Sasak, 2, 99–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Thomason, Sarah G., & Everett, Daniel L.
    (2001) Pronoun borrowing. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 27, 301–315. 10.3765/bls.v27i1.1107
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v27i1.1107 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wolff, John U., & Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo
    (1982) Communicative codes in central Java. New York: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wouk, Fay
    (1999) Sasak is different: A discourse perspective on voice. Oceanic Linguistics, 38(1), 91–114. 10.2307/3623394
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3623394 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2002) Voice in languages of Nusa Tenggara Barat. InFay Wouk & Malcom Ross (Eds.), Pacific linguistics (pp.285–309). Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2008) The syntax of intonation units in Sasak. Studies in Language, 32(1),137–162. 10.1075/sl.32.1.06wou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.32.1.06wou [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.20006.kha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.20006.kha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error