Word order variation in Chinese existential constructions with V-măn

References

1. Anderson, Stephen R.
   (1971) On the role of deep structure in semantic interpretation. Foundations of Language, 7, 387–396.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bayley, Robert, & Preston, Dennis R.
   (Eds.) (1996) Second language acquisition and linguistic variation, volume10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.10.05bay
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.10.05bay [Google Scholar]
3. Birner, Betty J.
   (1994) Information status and word order: An analysis of English Inversion. Language, 70, 233–259. 10.2307/415828
   https://doi.org/10.2307/415828 [Google Scholar]
4. Bock, Kathryn, Loebell, Helga, & Morey, Randal
   (1992) From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99(1), 150–171. 10.1037/0033‑295X.99.1.150
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.150 [Google Scholar]
5. Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J., & Tanaka, Mikihiro
   (2008) Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua, 118, (2), 172–189. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.003 [Google Scholar]
6. Bresnan, Joan
   (1994) Locative inversion and the architecture of universal grammar. Language, 70, 72–131. 10.2307/416741
   https://doi.org/10.2307/416741 [Google Scholar]
7. Bybee, Joan
   (1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
8. Bybee, Joan, & Thompson, Sandra
   (1997) Three frequency effects in syntax. InAnnual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 23(1). 10.3765/bls.v23i1.1293
   https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v23i1.1293 [Google Scholar]
9. Bybee, Joan
   (2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
10. Bybee, Joan, & Hopper, Paul J.
    (2001) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45 [Google Scholar]
11. Chafe, Wallace
    (1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. InRussell S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp.21–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.11.03cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.11.03cha [Google Scholar]
12. Chen, Rong
    (2003) English inversion: A ground-before-figure construction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110895100
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895100 [Google Scholar]
13. Croft, William, & Cruse, D. Alan
    (2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
14. Dong, Cheng-ru
    (2009) Cunzaiju de renzhi yanjiu: Jiyu canzhaodian de xingweilian moshi [Toward a cognitive study of the existential-presentational construction: A reference point-based Action Chain Model]. Suzhou: Suzhou University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dowty, David
    (2000) ‘The garden swarms with bees’ and the fallacy of ‘argument alternation’. InYael Ravin & Claudia Leacock (Eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches (pp.111–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dowty, David
    (2001) The semantic assymmetry of ‘argument alternations’ (and why it matters). InG. van der Meer, & ter Meulen, A. G. B. (Eds), Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik [Making Sense: From Lexeme to Discourse] (pp.171–86). Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Doyle, Arthur Conan, & Rathbone, Basil
    (1895) A scandal in Bohemia. Chicago: Donohue, Henneberry.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Foley, William A.
    (1994) Information structure. InRonald E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp.1678–1685). New York: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Givón, T.
    (2001) Syntax: An introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.syns
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.syns [Google Scholar]
20. Goldberg, Adele E.
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hawkins, John A.
    (1994) A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hu, Wenze
    (1995) Verbal semantics of the presentative sentences. Linguistics Study, 100–112.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Huang, C. T. James
    (1987) Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. InEric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen (Eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness (pp.226–253). Cambridge: MIt Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Huang, Chu-Ren, Kilgarriff Adam, Yiching Wu, Chih-Ming Chiu, Simon Smith, Pavel Rychly, Ming-Hong Bai & Keh-Jiann Chen
    (2005) Chinese Sketch Engine and the extraction of grammatical collocations. Paper presented to thethe Fourth SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kilgarriff, Adam, Rychly, Pavel, Smrz, Pavel, & Tugwell, David
    (2004) The sketch engine. Paper presented tothe Euralex, Lorient, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Labov, William
    (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns, No. 4. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Langacker, Ronald W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites, volume1. Stanford, CA: Stanford university press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Langacker, Ronald W.
    (2001) Cognitive linguistics, language pedagogy, and the English present tense. InMartin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier and René Dirven (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics: Theory and language acquisition (pp.3–39). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110866247.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866247.3 [Google Scholar]
29. Levin, Beth
    (1993) English verb classes and alternations. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Li, Charles N., & Thompson, Sandra A.
    (1975) The semantics function of word order: A case study in Mandarin. InCharles Li (Ed.), Word order and word order change (pp.163–195). Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Liu, Feng-hsi
    (2007) Word order variation and ba sentences in Chinese. Studies in Language, 31(3), 649–682. 10.1075/sl.31.3.05liu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.3.05liu [Google Scholar]
32. Liu, Yue-hua, Wen-yu Pan, & Wei Gu
    (2001) Shiyong xiandai HanYu yufa [Modern Chinese grammar for teachers of Chinese as a second language and advanced learners of Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. McDonald, Janet L., Bock, Kathryn, & Kelly, Michael H.
    (1993) Word and world order: Semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position. Cognitive Psychology, 25 (2), 188–230. 10.1006/cogp.1993.1005
    https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1005 [Google Scholar]
34. Pan, Haihua
    (1996) Imperfective aspect ZHE, agent deletion, and locative inversion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, 409–432. 10.1007/BF00133688
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133688 [Google Scholar]
35. Prince, Ellen F.
    (1992) The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information structure. InSandra Thompson & William Mann (Eds.), Diverse analyses of a fundraising text (pp.295–325). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.16.12pri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16.12pri [Google Scholar]
36. Quirk, Randolph
    (1972) A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman Group.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sabar, Nadav
    (2010) Existentials as existentials: On topic-comment structure in existential sentences. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Safir, Kenneth
    (1982) Syntactic chains and the definiteness effect. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Särndal, Carl-Erik, Swensson, Bengt, & Wretman, Jan
    (2003) Model assisted survey sampling. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Seoane, Elena
    (2009) Syntactic complexity, discourse status and animacy as determinants of grammatical variation in Modern English. English Language and Linguistics13 (3), 365–384. 10.1017/S1360674309990153
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674309990153 [Google Scholar]
41. Sornicola, Rosanna
    (2006) Interaction of syntactic and pragmatic factors on basic word order in the languages of Europe. InGiuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (Eds.), Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe (pp.357–544). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110892222.357
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892222.357 [Google Scholar]
42. Tagliamonte, Sali
    (2006) Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801624
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801624 [Google Scholar]
43. Tai, James H-Y.
    (1985) Temporal sequence and word order in Chinese. InJohn Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp.49–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.6.04tai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.04tai [Google Scholar]
44. Tai, James H-Y.
    (2005) Conceptual structure and conceptualizations in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 6, (4) 539–574.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Talmy, Leonard
    (2000a) Toward a cognitive semantics: Concept structuring systems, volume1. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Talmy, Leonard
    (2000b) Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring, volume2. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Tang, Ting-chi
    (1979) Guoyu yufa yanjiu lunji [Collection of studies on Mandarin grammar]. Taipei: Student Book.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Ute, Römer
    (2009) The inseparability of lexis and grammar. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7 (1), 140–162. 10.1075/arcl.7.06rom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.06rom [Google Scholar]
49. Xing, Janet Zhiqun
    (2006) Teaching and learning Chinese as a foreign language: A pedagogical grammar, volume1. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Xu, Lie-jiong, & Liu, Dan-qing
    (2007) Huati de jiegou yu gongneng [Topic: structural and functional analysis]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Yang, Suying, & Pan, Haihua
    (2001) A constructional analysis of the existential structure. InHaihua Pan (Ed.), Studies in Chinese Linguistics II (pp.189–208). Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Yao, Yao
    (2014) Predicting the use of BA construction in Mandarin Chinese discourse: A modeling study with two verbs. InWirote Aroonmanakun, Prachya Boonkwan, & Thepchai Supnithi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computing (PACLIC28). Thailand: Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Zhang, Lan
    (2008) Locative inversion and aspect markers le and zhe in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at theNorth American Conference Chinese Linguistics-20, The Ohio State University.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Chinese Word Sketch
    Chinese Word Sketch: https://wordsketch.ling.sinica.edu.tw/index.html
55. Sinica Corpus
    Sinica Corpus: asbc.iis.sinica.edu.tw/
56. Udndata
    Udndatahttps://udndata.com/ndapp/Index?cp=udn