1887
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1354
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1362
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Under Talmy’s (2000a) framework of Figure and Ground segregation, this paper examines the word order variation between constructions [NP V- NP] and [NP V- NP] regarding Chinese existential phenomenon, that is, . ‘Bees swarm in the garden.’ and ‘The garden swarms with bees.’

In this data-driven study, 263 monosyllabic verbs are investigated and 1456 news texts are collected for a quantitative analysis. This study has successfully identified linguistic factors that can better account for the distributional patterns of the word order alternation in the corpora. Results of the VARBRUL analysis indicate that topicality of the post verbal NP and definiteness of Figure NP play a relatively crucial role in determining the word order choice, while semantic type of verb and animacy of Figure NP are less influential. This paper presents a variationist perspective on the motivations that trigger the use of Chinese existential construction [NP V NP].

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.20010.chi
2022-02-14
2022-05-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Stephen R.
    (1971) On the role of deep structure in semantic interpretation. Foundations of Language, 7, 387–396.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bayley, Robert, & Preston, Dennis R.
    (Eds.) (1996) Second language acquisition and linguistic variation, volume10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.10.05bay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.10.05bay [Google Scholar]
  3. Birner, Betty J.
    (1994) Information status and word order: An analysis of English Inversion. Language, 70, 233–259. 10.2307/415828
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415828 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bock, Kathryn, Loebell, Helga, & Morey, Randal
    (1992) From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99(1), 150–171. 10.1037/0033‑295X.99.1.150
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.150 [Google Scholar]
  5. Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J., & Tanaka, Mikihiro
    (2008) Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua, 118, (2), 172–189. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bresnan, Joan
    (1994) Locative inversion and the architecture of universal grammar. Language, 70, 72–131. 10.2307/416741
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416741 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, Joan
    (1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bybee, Joan, & Thompson, Sandra
    (1997) Three frequency effects in syntax. InAnnual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 23(1). 10.3765/bls.v23i1.1293
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v23i1.1293 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bybee, Joan
    (2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bybee, Joan, & Hopper, Paul J.
    (2001) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chafe, Wallace
    (1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. InRussell S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp.21–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.11.03cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.11.03cha [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, Rong
    (2003) English inversion: A ground-before-figure construction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110895100
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895100 [Google Scholar]
  13. Croft, William, & Cruse, D. Alan
    (2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dong, Cheng-ru
    (2009) Cunzaiju de renzhi yanjiu: Jiyu canzhaodian de xingweilian moshi [Toward a cognitive study of the existential-presentational construction: A reference point-based Action Chain Model]. Suzhou: Suzhou University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dowty, David
    (2000) ‘The garden swarms with bees’ and the fallacy of ‘argument alternation’. InYael Ravin & Claudia Leacock (Eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches (pp.111–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2001) The semantic assymmetry of ‘argument alternations’ (and why it matters). InG. van der Meer, & ter Meulen, A. G. B. (Eds), Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik [Making Sense: From Lexeme to Discourse] (pp.171–86). Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Doyle, Arthur Conan, & Rathbone, Basil
    (1895) A scandal in Bohemia. Chicago: Donohue, Henneberry.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Foley, William A.
    (1994) Information structure. InRonald E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp.1678–1685). New York: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Givón, T.
    (2001) Syntax: An introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.syns
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.syns [Google Scholar]
  20. Goldberg, Adele E.
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hawkins, John A.
    (1994) A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hu, Wenze
    (1995) Verbal semantics of the presentative sentences. Linguistics Study, 100–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang, C. T. James
    (1987) Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. InEric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen (Eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness (pp.226–253). Cambridge: MIt Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang, Chu-Ren, Kilgarriff Adam, Yiching Wu, Chih-Ming Chiu, Simon Smith, Pavel Rychly, Ming-Hong Bai & Keh-Jiann Chen
    (2005) Chinese Sketch Engine and the extraction of grammatical collocations. Paper presented to thethe Fourth SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kilgarriff, Adam, Rychly, Pavel, Smrz, Pavel, & Tugwell, David
    (2004) The sketch engine. Paper presented tothe Euralex, Lorient, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Labov, William
    (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns, No. 4. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Langacker, Ronald W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites, volume1. Stanford, CA: Stanford university press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2001) Cognitive linguistics, language pedagogy, and the English present tense. InMartin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier and René Dirven (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics: Theory and language acquisition (pp.3–39). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110866247.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866247.3 [Google Scholar]
  29. Levin, Beth
    (1993) English verb classes and alternations. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, Charles N., & Thompson, Sandra A.
    (1975) The semantics function of word order: A case study in Mandarin. InCharles Li (Ed.), Word order and word order change (pp.163–195). Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, Feng-hsi
    (2007) Word order variation and ba sentences in Chinese. Studies in Language, 31(3), 649–682. 10.1075/sl.31.3.05liu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.3.05liu [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu, Yue-hua, Wen-yu Pan, & Wei Gu
    (2001) Shiyong xiandai HanYu yufa [Modern Chinese grammar for teachers of Chinese as a second language and advanced learners of Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McDonald, Janet L., Bock, Kathryn, & Kelly, Michael H.
    (1993) Word and world order: Semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position. Cognitive Psychology, 25 (2), 188–230. 10.1006/cogp.1993.1005
    https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1005 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pan, Haihua
    (1996) Imperfective aspect ZHE, agent deletion, and locative inversion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, 409–432. 10.1007/BF00133688
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133688 [Google Scholar]
  35. Prince, Ellen F.
    (1992) The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information structure. InSandra Thompson & William Mann (Eds.), Diverse analyses of a fundraising text (pp.295–325). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.16.12pri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16.12pri [Google Scholar]
  36. Quirk, Randolph
    (1972) A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sabar, Nadav
    (2010) Existentials as existentials: On topic-comment structure in existential sentences. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Safir, Kenneth
    (1982) Syntactic chains and the definiteness effect. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Särndal, Carl-Erik, Swensson, Bengt, & Wretman, Jan
    (2003) Model assisted survey sampling. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Seoane, Elena
    (2009) Syntactic complexity, discourse status and animacy as determinants of grammatical variation in Modern English. English Language and Linguistics13 (3), 365–384. 10.1017/S1360674309990153
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674309990153 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sornicola, Rosanna
    (2006) Interaction of syntactic and pragmatic factors on basic word order in the languages of Europe. InGiuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (Eds.), Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe (pp.357–544). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110892222.357
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892222.357 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tagliamonte, Sali
    (2006) Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801624
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801624 [Google Scholar]
  43. Tai, James H-Y.
    (1985) Temporal sequence and word order in Chinese. InJohn Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp.49–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.6.04tai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.04tai [Google Scholar]
  44. (2005) Conceptual structure and conceptualizations in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 6, (4) 539–574.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Talmy, Leonard
    (2000a) Toward a cognitive semantics: Concept structuring systems, volume1. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (2000b) Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring, volume2. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Tang, Ting-chi
    (1979) Guoyu yufa yanjiu lunji [Collection of studies on Mandarin grammar]. Taipei: Student Book.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Ute, Römer
    (2009) The inseparability of lexis and grammar. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7 (1), 140–162. 10.1075/arcl.7.06rom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.06rom [Google Scholar]
  49. Xing, Janet Zhiqun
    (2006) Teaching and learning Chinese as a foreign language: A pedagogical grammar, volume1. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu, Lie-jiong, & Liu, Dan-qing
    (2007) Huati de jiegou yu gongneng [Topic: structural and functional analysis]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang, Suying, & Pan, Haihua
    (2001) A constructional analysis of the existential structure. InHaihua Pan (Ed.), Studies in Chinese Linguistics II (pp.189–208). Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Yao, Yao
    (2014) Predicting the use of BA construction in Mandarin Chinese discourse: A modeling study with two verbs. InWirote Aroonmanakun, Prachya Boonkwan, & Thepchai Supnithi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computing (PACLIC28). Thailand: Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, Lan
    (2008) Locative inversion and aspect markers le and zhe in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at theNorth American Conference Chinese Linguistics-20, The Ohio State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Chinese Word Sketch
  55. Sinica Corpus
  56. Udndata
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.20010.chi
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.20010.chi
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error