1887
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1354
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1362
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper explores the flattening of Japanese sentential pitch as a possible nationwide change in progress among younger generations. Comparative data collected by identical protocols are examined in terms of speakers’ age, gender, and native dialects (in the city of Sapporo and in a rural town in Hokkaido, and in the city of Kagoshima in Kyushu). The paper also stresses the significance of including different registers in prosodic analysis and addressing potential problems with standard practices in which read-aloud materials comprise the primary resource. Based on naturalistic speech production data (i.e., spontaneous speech from a picture story description), our results reveal that: (1) regardless of the accentual discrepancies in their native dialects, younger generations characteristically speak in phonetically flattened realizations of pitch accompanying consistent, steeper declination, and (2) an age-linked differentiation also exists in prosodic phrasing, which is closely linked to the flattening of sentential pitch.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.3.1.02tak
2017-09-19
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ayers, Gayle M.
    (1994) Discourse functions of pitch range in spontaneous and read speech. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 44, 1–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beckman, Mary , & Pierrehumbert, Janet
    (1986) Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255–309. doi: 10.1017/S095267570000066X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570000066X [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen, Antonie , Collier, Ren , & ‘T Hart, Johan
    (1982) Declination: Construct or intrinsic feature of speech pitch?Phonetica, 39, 254–273. doi: 10.1159/000261666
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000261666 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cole, Jennifer , & Thomas, Erik R.
    (2005) Intonational distinctiveness of African American English. Paper presented at theXXXIV New Ways of Analyzing Conference, New York University.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Haga, Yasushi
    (1961) Hoogen-no jittai-to kyootsuugoka-no mondai: Hokkaido [The reality of dialects and problems with standardization: The case of Hokkaido]. In Yoshimoto Endoo & Misao Toojoo (Eds.), Hoogengaku Kooza, volume2 [Courses on dialectology](pp.100–126). Tokyo: Tokyodoo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heffernan, Kevin
    (2006) Prosodic levelling during language shift: Okinawan approximations of Japanese pitch-accent. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(5), 641–666. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00299.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00299.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Hiramoto, Mie , & Wong, Andrew
    (2005) Another look at ‘Japanese Women’s Language: A prosodic analysis. Chicago Linguistic Society, 41(1), 111–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirayama, Teruo
    (1960) Zenkoku akusento jiten [Regional dialect dictionary]. Tokyo: Tokyodoo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Igarashi, Yosuke , Kikuchi, Hideaki , & Maekawa, Kikuo
    (2006) Inritsu Joohoo [Prosodic information]. InNihongo hanashi-kotoba koopasu-no koochiku-hoo (Report No. 124) [Construction of the corpus of spontaneous Japanese] (pp.347–454). Tokyo: NINJAL.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Inoue, Fumio
    (1981) Hokkaido nai-no hoogen sa [Regional differences within Hokkaido dialect]. InIgarashi Saburoo Sensei koki kinen shukuga ronbun shuu [Papers dedicated to the celebration of Professor Saburoo Igarashi’s 70th birthday] (pp.72–83). Sapporo: Hokkaido Hoogen Kenkyuu Kai [Hokkaido dialect circle].
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1985) Shin-hoogen-no sonzai-to nintei [Existence of new dialects and their identification]. Gengo Seikatsu, 399, 22–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ito, Kiwako , & Speer, Shari R.
    (2006) Using interactive tasks to elicit natural dialogue. In Stefan Sudhoff , Denisa Lenertova , Roland Meyer , Sandra Pappert , & Petra Augurzky (Eds.), Methods in empirical prosody research (pp.229–257). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Koiso, Hanae , Yoneyama, Seiko , Maki, Yoichi , & Fon, Janice
    (2003) Nihongo Hanashi Kotoba Koopasu-o mochiita danwa koozoo-to inritsu-tono kankei-ni kansuru ichi koosatsu [An analysis of prosody and discourse structure in the corpus of spontaneous Japanese]. Jinkoo Chinoo Gakkai Kenkyuu kai Shiryoo [Sources for the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence Conference], 37, 139–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Koori, Shiroo
    (2007) Tokyo hoogen-no shizen kaiwa-ni mirareru akusento jakka-no jittai [The reality of accent weakening observed in Tokyo Japanese natural conversations]. Paper presented at the21st Conference of the Phonetics Society of Japan, Nagoya University, Japan.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kubozono, Haruo
    (1989) Syntactic and rhythmic effects on downstep in Japanese. Phonology, 6(1), 39–67. doi: 10.1017/S0952675700000944
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000944 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2012) Varieties of pitch accent systems in Japanese. Lingua, 122, 1395–1414. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kubozono, Haruo , & Ota, Satoshi
    (1998) Onin koozoo to akusento [Phonological structures and accents]. Tokyo: Kenkyuusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Labov, William
    (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1984) Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In John Baugh & Joel Sherzer (Eds.), Language in use (pp.28–53). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1994) Principles of linguistic change, volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, USA: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2001) Principles of linguistic change, volume 2: Social factors. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ladd, D. Robert
    (1996) Intonational phonology. Cambridge: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Maekawa, Kikuo , & Igarashi, Yosuke
    (2006) Prosodic independence of bimoraic particles: Analysis of the corpus of spontaneous Japanese. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 10(2), 33–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mogami, Katsuya
    (1994) Hoosoo-no kotoba-to akusento: Gairaigo akusento-no heibanka-o rei-ni [Media language and accents: The flattening of loanword accents as an example]. Nihongogaku, 13(5), 73–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics
    National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics (1965) Kyootsuugoka-no katei: Hokkaido-ni okeru oyako sanda- no kotoba [The process of change toward a common language: The speech of three generations in Hokkaido] (NINJAL Report No. 27).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics
    National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics (1994) Tsuruoka hoogen-nokijutsuteki kenkyuu: Dai sanji Tsuruoka choosa hookoku 1 [A descriptive study of the Tsuruoka dialect: The third language survey in Tsuruoka City 1] (NINJAL Report 109–1).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics
    National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics (1997) Hokkaido-ni okeru kyootsuugoka-to gengo seikatsu-no jittai [Change towards a common language and the reality of lives of dialect speakers] (NINJAL Interim Research Report).
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nomoto, Kikuo
    (1960) Hokkaido hoogen-no akusento [Accents of Hokkaido dialects]. Keiryoo Kokugogaku, 15, 10–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ohara, Yumiko
    (1992) Gender-dependent pitch levels: A comparative study in Japanese and English. In Kira Hall , Mary Bucholtz , & Birch Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp.469–488). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Okamoto, Shigeko
    (1995) Tasteless Japanese. In Kira Hall & Mary Bucholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp.297–325). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ono, Yoneichi
    (1981) Gengo kenkyuu-to Hokkaido hoogen [The study of language and Hokkaido dialects]. InIgarashi Saburo Sensei koki kinen shukuga ronbun-shuu [Papers dedicated to the celebration of Professor Saburoo Igarashi’s 70th birthday] (pp.194–209). Sapporo: Hokkaido Hoogen Kenkyuu Kai [Hokkaido dialect circle].
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (1993) Hokkaido hoogen-no kenkyuu [A study of Hokkaido dialects]. Tokyo: Gakugei Tosho.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ota, Ichiro , & Takano, Shoji
    (2007) Shakai onseigakuteki hen’ i-o toraeru tame-no onsei chooshu jikken-ni kansuru koosatsu [A reflection on the methodological problems of auditory experiment for sociophonetic variation]. Cultural Science Reports, 66, 23–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2008a) E byoosha tasuku-ni miru onchoo hen’ i-no koosatsu [Notes on pitch variation observed in picture-description task]. Cultural Science Reports, 67, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2008b) Onchoo-no hen’ i-ga shimesu mono: Akusento ku-no dephrasing to recomposing [What does the tonal variation tell us: Dephrasing and recomposing of accentual phrase]. Cultural Science Reports, 68, 27–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2014) The media influence on language change in Japanese sociolinguistic contexts. In Jannis Androutsopoulos (Ed.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change (pp.171–203). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ota, Ichiro , Takano, Shoji , Nikaido, Hitoshi , Utsugi, Akira , & Asahi, Yoshiyuki
    (2012) Sociolinguistic variation in the pitch movement of Japanese dialects. Poster presented atNWAV-Asia Pacific 2, NINJAL, Japan.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pierrehumbert, Janet
    (1980) The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pierrehumbert, Janet , & Beckman, Mary
    (1988) Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sanada, Shinji
    (2000) Datsu hyoojungo-no jidai [The era of de-standard language]. Tokyo: Shoogakkan.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sanada, Shinji , Shibuya, Katsumi , Jinnouchi, Masataka , & Sugito, Seiju
    (1999) Shakai Gengogaku [Sociolinguistics]. Tokyo: Oofuu.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    (1998) Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 41(3–4), 235–263. doi: 10.1177/002383099804100402
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099804100402 [Google Scholar]
  43. Sibata, Takesi
    (1959) Hokkaido ni umareta kyootsuugo [A common language born in Hokkaido]. Gengo Seikatsu, 90, 26–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (1978) Shakai-gengogaku-no kadai [Issues in sociolinguistics]. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (1995) Nihongo-wa omoshiroi [Japanese is interesting]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sugitoo, Miyoko
    (1983) Akusento-no ‘yure’ [‘Variability’ in accents]. Nihongogaku, 8(3), 15–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (1997) Shizenna taiwa-ni okeru hibunpootekina hatsuwa-no purosodii-to kikite-no rikai [Prosody of ungrammatical utterances in natural conversation and the listeners’ understandings]. InBunpoo-to Onsei [Grammar and speech] (pp.281–297). Tokyo: Kurosio.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Takano, Shoji
    (2008) Variation in Japanese prosodic focus: Issues of language specificity, interactive style and register. In Kimberly Jones & Tsuyoshi Ono (Eds.), Style shifting in Japanese (pp.285–327). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.180.00var
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.180.00var [Google Scholar]
  49. Takano, Shoji , & Ota, Ichiro
    (2005a) A sociolinguistic study of pitch leveling in Japanese: A preliminary analysis. Paper presented at thefifth UK Language Variation and Change Conference, University of Aberdeen.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (2005b) Nihongo onsei-ni okeru picchi heitanka genshoo-no shikooteki kenkyuu: Hen’ i rironteki kanten-kara [A preliminary study of pitch flattening in Japanese from a perspective of variation theory]. Paper presented at the16th Conference of the Japanese Association of Sociolinguistic Sciences, Ryuukoku University, Kyoto.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (2005c) Nihongo onsei-ni okeru picchi heitanka genshoo-no shikootekikenkyuu: Hen’ i rironteki kanten-kara [A preliminary study of Japanese pitch flattening from a perspective of variation theory]. Proceedings of the 16th Meeting of the Japanese Association of Sociolinguistic Sciences, Ryuukoku University, Kyoto, 220–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2006) Generational change in Japanese prosody: A sociophonetic analysis of pitch leveling. Paper presented at the16th Sociolinguistics Symposium, University of Limerick.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Tanaka, Hiroko
    (2004) Prosody for marking transition-relevance places in Japanese conversation: The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objects. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Cecillia E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction (pp.63–96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.62.06tan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.62.06tan [Google Scholar]
  54. Tokugawa, Munemasa , & Sanada, Shinji
    (2001) Shin hoogengaku- o manabu hito-no tame-ni [For people who study new dialectology]. Tokyo: Sekai Shisoosha.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Umeda, Noriko
    (1982) “FO declination” is situation dependent. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 279–290.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Venditti, Jennifer J.
    (1995) Japanese ToBI labeling guidelines. The OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, 50, 127–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. (2005) The J_ToBI Model of Japanese Intonation. In Sun-Ah Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp.172–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  58. Venditti, Jennifer J. , & Swerts, Marc
    (1996) Intonational cues to discourse structure in Japanese. In H. Timothy Bunnell & William Idsardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSPL 96): vol.2 (pp.725–728). Philadelphia: Pennsylvania. doi: 10.1109/ICSLP.1996.607464
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSLP.1996.607464 [Google Scholar]
  59. Yaeger-Dror, Malcah
    (1996) Register as a variable in prosodic analysis: The case of the English negative. Speech Communication, 19, 39–60. doi: 10.1016/0167‑6393(96)00013‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(96)00013-1 [Google Scholar]
  60. (1997) Contraction of negatives as evidence of variance in register-specific interactive roles. Language Variation and Change, 9(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1017/S0954394500001770
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001770 [Google Scholar]
  61. (2002a) Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1333–1343. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00068‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00068-1 [Google Scholar]
  62. (2002b) Register and prosodic variation, a cross language comparison. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1495–1536. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00069‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00069-3 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.3.1.02tak
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aplv.3.1.02tak
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): age-related variation , Japanese , prosody , register , sociophonetics and style
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error