Ursula Wingate, Academic Literacy and Student Diversity: The Case for Inclusive Practice

References

1. Bhatia, V. K.
   (1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Freadman, A.
   (1994) ‘Anyone for Tennis?’InA. Freedman and P. Medway (eds), Genre and the New rhetoric (pp.43–66). London: Taylor and Francis.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Freadman, A.
   (2012) The traps and trappings of genre theory. Applied Linguistics33(5), 544–563. 10.1093/applin/ams050
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams050 [Google Scholar]
4. Hymes, D.
   (1972) On communicative Competence. InJ. B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics (pp.269–293). London: Penguin.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Lea, M.
   (2005) ‘Communities of practice’ in higher education; useful heuristic or educational model?. InD. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond Communities of Practice: Language, power and social context (pp.180–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610554.010
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610554.010 [Google Scholar]
6. Miller, C.
   (1994) Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. InA. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp.67–78). London: Taylor and Francis.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ochs, E.
   (1986) Introduction. InB. Schieffelin and E. Ochs (eds) Language Socialisation across Cultures (pp.1–13). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Prior, P.
   (1998) Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Seidlhofer, B.
   (Ed.) (2003) Controversies in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Swales, J. M.
    (1990) Genre analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]