Volume 42, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper reports on a semester-long study that explored the experience of a group of local and international students from multiple disciplines, and their teachers, in a core Intercultural Communication undergraduate course of 550 students in which there is an orientation to learning, teaching and assessment that seeks to develop students’ intercultural learning capabilities. To capture the experience of learning, teaching and assessment in a highly diverse Australian university, data were collected over the life cycle of the course. The research design was ethnographic and collaborative, involving the research team, members of the teaching staff, and members of the university’s learning and teaching unit. The data include interviews with students and teachers, students’ written assessments, and observations of weekly teaching staff meetings. The overarching finding of the study is that, to enable students to develop their intercultural learning capabilities, there is a need to rethink notions of experience and engagement, specifically to attend to the central role of language/s and culture/s in all students’ experience of learning, teaching, and assessment. Analysed examples from the data are used to illustrate four specific guiding principles underpinning this (re)orientation to learning. The study was one of two case studies funded by the University of South Australia as part of a larger project: Developing English Language and Intercultural Learning Capabilities.1


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Appadurai, A.
    (1996) Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Australian Government. Department of Education and Training
    Australian Government. Department of Education and Training (2017) Research snapshot. Onshore higher education international students as a proportion of all onshore students, by university 2016 Retrieved fromhttps://internationaleducation.gov.au/research/Research-Snapshots/Documents/Higher%20education%202016.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker, S. , & Crichton, J.
    (2008) Assessing and evaluating intercultural teaching and learning: An information management case study. Journal of International Education in Business, 1(1), 29–42. 10.1108/18363261080001588
    https://doi.org/10.1108/18363261080001588 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blommaert, J.
    (2013) Citizenship, language, and superdiversity: Towards complexity. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 12(3), 193–196. doi:  10.1080/15348458.2013.797276
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2013.797276 [Google Scholar]
  5. Byram, M.
    (1997) Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clyne, M.
    (2005) Australia’s language potential. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Creswell, J. W.
    (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Crichton, J.
    (2019) Transdisciplinary applied linguistics: Themes of perspectivity and transcendence. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 143–148.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Crichton, J. , & Scarino, A.
    (2007) How are we to understand the ‘intercultural dimension’? An examination of the intercultural dimension of internationalisation in the context of higher education in Australia. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 4.1–4.21. 10.2104/aral0704
    https://doi.org/10.2104/aral0704 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2009) Developing the intercultural dimensions of internationalisation. In H. Chen & K. Cruikshank (Eds.), Making a difference: Challenges for applied linguistics (pp.65–82). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Crichton, J. , Scarino, A. , Papademetre, L. , Barker, S. , Lushington, K. , & Woods, M.
    (2006) Assessing and evaluating intercultural teaching and learning: A focus on sites of intercultural interaction. Report to Teaching and Learning Committee. Adelaide: Research Centre for Languages and Cultures, University of South Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gadamer, H. G.
    (1989) Truth and method. ( J. Weinsheimer & D. Marshall , Trans., 2nd, ed.). London: Sheed and Ward.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodson, I. F.
    (2008) Investigating the teachers’ life and work. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1993) Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116. 10.1016/0898‑5898(93)90026‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7 [Google Scholar]
  15. Heugh, K.
    (2013) Mobility, migration and sustainability: Refiguring languages in diversity. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 222, 5–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Knight, J.
    (2004) Internationalization remodelled: Definitions, approaches and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31. 10.1177/1028315303260832
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315303260832 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kramsch, C.
    (2011) The symbolic dimensions of the intercultural. Language Teaching, 44(3), 354–367. doi:  10.1017/S0261444810000431
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000431 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kraus, P. A.
    (2012) The politics of complex diversity: A European perspective. Ethnicities, 12, 3–25. 10.1177/1468796811426952
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796811426952 [Google Scholar]
  19. Liddicoat, A. J. , & Crichton, J.
    (2008) The monolingual framing of international education in Australia. Sociolinguistic Studies, 2(3), 367–384. 10.1558/sols.v2i3.367
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v2i3.367 [Google Scholar]
  20. Liddicoat, A. J. , & Scarino, A.
    (2013) Intercultural language teaching and learning. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118482070
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118482070 [Google Scholar]
  21. May, S.
    (Ed) (2014) The multilingual turn: Implications for LSA, TESOL and bilingual education. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Miles, M. B. , & Huberman, A. M.
    (1994) Qualitative data analysis2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Pauwels, A.
    (2000) Globalisation and the impact of teaching languages in Australia. In A. J. Liddicoat & C. Crozet (Eds.), Teaching languages, teaching cultures (pp.19–26). Melbourne: Language Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ryan, J. , & Viete, R.
    (2009) Respectful interactions: learning with international students in the English-speaking academy, Teaching in Higher Education, 14 (3), 303–314. doi:  10.1080/13562510902898866
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510902898866 [Google Scholar]
  25. Scarino, A.
    (2014) Learning as reciprocal, interpretive meaning-making. A view from collaborative research into the professional learning of teachers of languages. The Modern Language Journal, (Special Issue) 98(1): 386–401. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2014.12068.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12068.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Scarino, A. , Crichton, J. , & Papademetre, L.
    (2005) A framework for quality assurance in the development and delivery of offshore programs in languages other than English – Report to the Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee. Adelaide: University of South Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Scarino, A. , Liddicoat, A. J. , & O’Neill, F.
    (2015) The experience of intercultural interaction among Muslim and non-Muslim students: A case study. Commissioned report for the Centre of Muslim & non-Muslim Understanding with Catholic Education. Adelaide: Research Centre for Languages and Cultures, University of South Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Scarino, A. , & Liddicoat, A. J.
    (2016) Reconceptualising learning in transdisciplinary languages education. L2 Journal, 8(4), 20–35. 10.5070/L28429918
    https://doi.org/10.5070/L28429918 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sfard, A.
    (1998) On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. 10.3102/0013189X027002004
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004 [Google Scholar]
  30. Snell, J. , Shaw, S. , & Copland, F.
    (2015) Linguistic ethnography: Interdisciplinary explorations. Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137035035
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035035 [Google Scholar]
  31. Stern, T. , Townsend, A. , Rauch, F. , & Schuster, A.
    (2014) Action research, innovation and change: International perspectives across disciplines. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. University of South Australia
    University of South Australia (2018) Our profile: Australia’s university of enterprise. Retrieved25 May 2018fromwww.unisa.edu.au/About-UniSA/University-profile/
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Zarate, G. , Lévy, D. , & Kramsch, C.
    (Eds.) (2011) Handbook of multilingualism and multiculturalism. Paris: Édition des Archives Contemporaines.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): diversity; intercultural capabilities; learning; teaching and assessment
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error