1887
Volume 42, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The aim of this article is to highlight theoretical and practical considerations in design of an intercultural communication course. The first part of the article considers intercultural competence, and uses Bourdieu’s notions of education to frame the design of an intercultural communication course. This is followed by discussion of general principles of intercultural course design; the concepts of backward design and constructive alignment as they relate to an intercultural communication course; and finally, the importance of including active and collaborative learning/teaching activities within course design. The remainder of the article draws on a case study of an existing Australian undergraduate course in intercultural communication to highlight how this course may be redesigned in line with the pedagogical principles discussed in the first part of the article.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.00023.hsi
2019-07-15
2019-11-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bigatel, P., Ragan, L., Kennan, S., May, J., & Redmond, B.
    (2012) The identification of competencies for online teaching success. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(1), pp.59–77. Retrieved fromhttps://www.learntechlib.org/p/132473/
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C.
    (2011) Teaching for quality learning at university4th ed.Berkshire, England: McGraw Hill Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourdieu, P.
    (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812507
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507 [Google Scholar]
  4. (1988) Homo academicus. California: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (1996) The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2000) Pascalian meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C.
    (1977) Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Carey, P.
    (2013) Student as co-producer in a marketised higher education system: A case study of students’ experience of participation in curriculum design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(3), 250–260. doi:  10.1080/14703297.2013.796714
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.796714 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F.
    (1987) Seven principles for good practice. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 39, 3–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cornell University
    Cornell University (2018) Teaching and learning in large lectures. Centre for Teaching Innovation. Retrieved fromhttps://www.cte.cornell.edu/teaching-ideas/large-lectures/teaching-and-learning-in-large-leactures.html#4
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Deardorff, D. K.
    (2004) The identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of international education at institutions of higher education in the United States. (Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University, USA). Retrieved fromhttps://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/bitstream/handle/1840.16/5733/etd.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  12. (2006) Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. doi:  10.1177/1028315306287002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2015) How to assess intercultural competence. InZ. Hua (Ed.). Research methods in intercultural communication: A practical guide (pp.120–134). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119166283.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166283.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  14. Edinburgh Napier University
    Edinburgh Napier University (2017) Assessment and feedback design guidelines. Retrieved fromhttps://staff.napier.ac.uk/services/dlte/resources/Documents/AssessmentAndFeedbackDesignGuidelinesSeptember2017.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fantini, A. E.
    (1997) A survey of intercultural communication courses. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21(1), 125–148. doi:  10.1016/S0147‑1767(96)00041‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(96)00041-7 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gregersen-Hermans, J., & Pusch, M. D.
    (2012) How to design and assess an intercultural learning experience. InK. Berardo & D. K. Deardorff (Eds.). Building cultural competence: Innovative activities and models (pp.41–62). Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Halualani, R. T.
    (2011) In/visible dimensions: framing the intercultural communication course through a critical intercultural communication framework. Intercultural Education, 22(1), 43–54. doi:  10.1080/14675986.2011.549644
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2011.549644 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoidn, S.
    (2017) Student-centred learning environments in higher education classrooms. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑349‑94941‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94941-0 [Google Scholar]
  19. Holliday, A.
    (2018) Designing a course in intercultural education. Intercultural Communication Education, 1(1), 4–11. doi:  10.29140/ice.v1n1.24
    https://doi.org/10.29140/ice.v1n1.24 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hua, Z.
    (2019) Exploring intercultural communication: Language in action2nd ed.London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hussey, H. D., Fleck, B., & Richmond, A. S.
    (2014) Promoting active learning through a flipped course design. InJ. Keengwe, G. Onchwari & J. Oigara (Eds.), Promoting active learning through the flipped classroom model (pp.23–46). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978‑1‑4666‑4987‑3.ch002
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4987-3.ch002 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jackson, J.
    (2015) Becoming interculturally competent: Theory to practice in international education. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 48, 91–107. doi:  10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.03.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.03.012 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2018) Interculturality in international education. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 10.4324/9780429490026
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429490026 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kinash, S., Naidu, V., Knight, D., Judd, M., Nair, C., Booth, S., … Tulloch, M.
    (2015) Student feedback: A learning and teaching performance indicator. Quality Assurance in Education, 23(4), 410–428. doi:  10.1108/QAE‑10‑2013‑0042
    https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-10-2013-0042 [Google Scholar]
  25. Knight, J.
    (2004) Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31. doi:  10.1177/1028315303260832
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315303260832 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kritt, D. W.
    (2018) Teaching as if children matter. InD. W. Kritt (Ed.), Constructivist education in an age of accountability (pp.3–19). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑66050‑9_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66050-9_1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Manolis, C., Burns, D., Assudani, R., & Chinta, R.
    (2013) Assessing experiential learning styles: A methodological reconstruction and validation of the Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 44–52. doi:  10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.009 [Google Scholar]
  28. Matsushita, K.
    (2018) An invitation to deep active learning. InK. Matsushita (Ed.), Deep active learning: Toward greater depth in university education (pp.15–33). Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑5660‑4_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5660-4_2 [Google Scholar]
  29. McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M., Franey, J., & Bassett, K.
    (2016) Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. doi:  10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856 [Google Scholar]
  30. Medina, L. C.
    (2018) Blended learning: Deficits and prospects in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 42–56. doi:  10.14742/ajet.3100
    https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3100 [Google Scholar]
  31. Michael, J.
    (2006) Where’s the evidence that active learning works?Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159–167. doi:  10.1152/advan.00053.2006
    https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006 [Google Scholar]
  32. Moran, C., & Young, C. A.
    (2014) Active learning in the flipped English language arts classroom. InJ. Keengwe, G. Onchwari, & J. Oigara (Eds.), Promoting active learning through the flipped classroom model (163–184). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978‑1‑4666‑4987‑3.ch009
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4987-3.ch009 [Google Scholar]
  33. Morong, G., & DesBiens, D.
    (2016) Culturally responsive online design: Learning at intercultural intersections. Intercultural Education, 27(5), 474–492. doi:  10.1080/14675986.2016.1240901
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2016.1240901 [Google Scholar]
  34. Naidoo, L., Wilkinson, J., Langat, K., Adoniou, M., Cunene, R., & Bolger, D.
    (2015) Supporting school-university pathways for refugee students’ access and participation in tertiary education. Report funded by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. University of Western Sydney, Kingswood, NSW, Australia. Retrieved fromwww.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/830864/Case_Study_Report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  35. O’Neill, G.
    (2015) Curriculum design in higher education: Theory’ to practice. Dublin: UCD Teaching and Learning. Retrieved fromwww.ucd.ie/t4cms/UCDTLP0068.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  36. O’Neill, G., Donnelly, R., & Fitzmaurice, F.
    (2014) Supporting programme teams to develop sequencing in higher education curricula. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(4), 268–280. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2013,867266
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013,867266 [Google Scholar]
  37. Partridge, H., Ponting, D., & McCay, M.
    (2011) Good practice report: Blended learning. Australian Learning & Teaching Council Ltd.Retrieved fromeprints.qut.edu.au/47566/1/47566.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ricketts, P., & Humphries, J.
    (2015) Taking an ethical approach to internationalization. University Affairs. Retrieved fromhttps://www.universityaffairs.ca/opinion/in-my-opinion/taking-ethical-approach-internationalization/
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Schoepp, K.
    (2017) The state of course learning outcomes at leading universities. Studies in Higher Education, 1–13 [Published online]. doi:  10.1080/03075079.2017.1392500
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1392500 [Google Scholar]
  40. Stanny, C. J.
    (2016) Reevaluating Bloom’s Taxonomy: What measurable verbs can and cannot say about student learning. Educational Science, 6(4), 37–49. doi:  10.3390/educsci6040037
    https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6040037 [Google Scholar]
  41. University of Queensland
    University of Queensland (2017) Graduate attributes. Retrieved fromppl.app.uq.edu.au/content/3.10.05-graduate-attributes#Procedures
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J.
    (2005) Understanding by design2nd ed.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2011) The understanding by design guide to creating high quality units. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.00023.hsi
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.00023.hsi
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error