1887
Australian Applied Language Studies
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The paper examines developmental aspects relating to how Warlpiri children introduce referents and maintain reference in narrative. Comparisons are made with the three levels of development proposed by Karmiloff-Smith, based on her work on cohesion in narrative with French- and English-speaking children. Examples are presented from children’s narratives to illustrate that Warlpiri children under six generally use ellipsis of core arguments without introducing the participants, while older children use ellipsis anaphorically, that is only after introducing the participants. The strategies for marking inter-sentence relations develop over a few years. Once the child is able to organize a narrative around a theme, there can be more flexibility in structuring the narrative.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.10.2.01bav
1987-01-01
2019-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bates, E. and B. MacWhinney
    (1979) A functionalist approach to the acquisition of grammar. In E. Ochs and B. Schieffelin (eds.) Developmental pragmatics. London, Academic Press: 167–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bavin, E. L. and T. Shopen
    (1985a) Children’s acquisition of Warlpiri: comprehension of transitive sentences. Journal of Child Language12:597–610. doi: 10.1017/S030500090000667X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090000667X [Google Scholar]
  3. (1985b) Warlpiri and English: languages in contact. In M. Clyne (ed.) Australia, meeting place of languages. Pacific Linguistics, C-92, Canberra, A. N. U.: 81–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (1985c) The development of narrative by Warlpiri children. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (1987) Innovations and neutralizations in the Warlpiri pronominal system. Journal of Linguistics23:149–175. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700011075
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011075 [Google Scholar]
  6. (to appear a) Acquisition of cues to sentence interpretation in a non-configurational language. In B. MacWhinney and E. Bates eds. Cross-linguistic studies in sentence comprehension. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (to appear b) Warlpiri in the 80s: an overview of research into language variation and child language. In B. Rigsby and S. Romaine eds. The language of Australia. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620881.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620881.008 [Google Scholar]
  8. Clancy, P.
    (1982) Referential strategies in the narratives of Japanese children. Paper presented atthe 7th Annual Boston University Conference on Child Language Development.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hale, K.
    (1982) The essential features of Warlpiri main clauses. In S. Swartz (ed.) Papers in Warlpiri grammar. Work Papers of SIL-AAB, Series A6. Darwin, SIL: 217–315.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hickman, M.
    (1980) Creating referents in discourse: a developmental analysis of linguistic cohesion. Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora, Chicago Linguistic Society: 192–203.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Karmiloff-Smith, A.
    (1979) A functional approach to child language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1980) Psychological processes underlying pronominalization and non-pronominalization in children’s connected discourse. Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora. Chicago Linguistic Society: 230–249.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (1981) The grammatical marking of thematic structure in the development of language production. In W. Deutsch (ed.) The child’s construction of language. London, Academic Press: 121–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1985) Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes1:61–85. doi: 10.1080/01690968508402071
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968508402071 [Google Scholar]
  15. Marslen-Wilson, W. and L. Tyler
    (1980) Toward a psychological basis for a theory of anaphora. Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora. Chicago Linguistic Society: 258–286.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Slobin, D. I.
    (1981) The origin of grammatical encoding of events. In W. Deutsch (ed.) The child’s construction of language. London, Academic Press: 185–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1982) Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In E. Wanner and L. Gleitman (eds.) Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 128–170.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (1985) Why study acquisition cross-lingustically. In D. I. Slobin (ed.) The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N. J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.10.2.01bav
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error